[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #13 from Ming Hua --- Created attachment 167266 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167266=edit Screenshot on my Windows 10 system, LO 6.4.7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #12 from Ming Hua --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #11) > In all those renderings, the two-dots and the shadda don't overlap. They may > be too close together for my taste, but that's not the same thing. Like Dieter discovered in comment #3 and I reproduced, if you select the text where the two diacritics overlap, and manually set it to "Arial" font again, the dots and shadda will become separate, while the rest of the rendering stay the same. All I'm saying is what you see is indeed Arial font from your X font's cache of the Windows fonts, not some fall-back font. Whether it's the "same thing" or not depends on context. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Ming Hua from comment #10) In all those renderings, the two-dots and the shadda don't overlap. They may be too close together for my taste, but that's not the same thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #10 from Ming Hua --- Created attachment 167247 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167247=edit Screenshot of Arial font in Windows font previewer Here is a screenshot of how Arial font is shown in Window's own font previewer, using the same sample text شقّة . The five different rendering correspond to different "facets" of the same font, in this case from top to bottom, Regular, Italic, Bold, Bold Italic, and Black. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #9 from Ming Hua --- First, I can reproduce both the problematic rendering like the screenshot in attachment 162301 and the "workaround" mentioned in comment 3 (choose text, re-assign font Arial, the rendering becomes correct) with 6.4.7 on Windows: Version: 6.4.7.2 (x64) Build ID: 639b8ac485750d5696d7590a72ef1b496725cfb5 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: default; VCL: win; Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Second, I question Eyal's judgement that this is caused by fall-back font. Not that I know any Arabic myself, but to my layman's eyes, the Arabic is rendered very similarly on my Windows as Eyal's screenshot, and Eyal says: (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #8) > By the way, perhaps I should mention I also > have the X font cache look at a Windows installation's font directory; and I > have a few fonts I've installed myself (not Arial of course). But any Windows installation should have Arial font installed. So I checked my Arial font, it does contain Arabic glyphs, and they look just like how the sample document is rendered in LO (and Eyal's screenshot). I therefore contend that this has nothing to do with fall-back font, but about rendering of Arial font when it's used by default (instead of by direct formatting). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Bug still manifests with : Version: 7.0.3.1 Build ID: d7547858d014d4cf69878db179d326fc3483e082 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.2; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: he-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US Calc: threaded on my Devuan GNU/Linux Beowulf. By the way, perhaps I should mention I also have the X font cache look at a Windows installation's font directory; and I have a few fonts I've installed myself (not Arial of course). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #7 from Xisco Faulí --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #6) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #5) > Do you mean the 7.1a1 version? 7.0.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #5) Do you mean the 7.1a1 version? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí --- Hello Eyal, Could you please try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the latest version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #4 from Dieter --- Tested with Version: 7.0.2.2 (x64) Build ID: 8349ace3c3162073abd90d81fd06dcfb6b36b994 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: he-IL (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| Blocks||71732 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de --- Comment #3 from Dieter --- Observation: I've opend your file, marked the word with the misplaced diacritics (Font Arial) and selected the font Arial again and diacritics are displayed correct. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 [Bug 71732] [META] Bugs related to text rendering, typography and font features in LO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 162301 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162301=edit Screenshot of the rendering of the document by LO 7.0 beta 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134226] Arabic diacritics misplaced when "fall-back" font is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134226 --- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 162300 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=162300=edit A document exhibiting this bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
