[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 Justin L changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jl...@mail.com Whiteboard||non-English-UI-needed --- Comment #14 from Justin L --- For English UI, this was fixed in LO 6.0 commit 707eb4db1918658e0c2c2c2033c6a69f80c4eafd Author: Justin Luth on Sat Jun 3 10:02:20 2017 +0300 tdf#82173 writerfilter: charStyle XnoteReference->Xnote Characters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #13 from NISZ LibreOffice Team --- Created attachment 173930 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=173930=edit The example file in current master, hu-HU UI Less so in: Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 67f2a99229101757af4f40118f4d3c83ba38648b CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI: hu-HU Calc: CL There might be something funny with importing the localized (or not) character style names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #12 from NISZ LibreOffice Team --- Created attachment 173929 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=173929=edit The example file in current master, en_US UI Looks good in: Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 67f2a99229101757af4f40118f4d3c83ba38648b CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #11 from Francesco --- No, by "import" I mean. "opening in Libre a .doc file created with Microsoft Word". Note that this problem only occurs when the file is very long, not for short documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #10 from Justin L --- Created attachment 168554 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168554=edit Doc per Bugzilla_fileopen.pdf: exaggerated fontsize of 22 to show superscript on file open OK - I think by import you are referring to Insert - Text from file. In that case, the existing footnote style is not changed to match the definition in the DOCX file. (I wouldn't consider that to be a bug.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||109195 Component|LibreOffice |Writer OS|Mac OS X (All) |All Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #9 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> --- I can confirm the problem in Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 6427bf87360a97f41ae351feaa35975c868260ec CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.5; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); UI: ru-RU TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2020-11-04_14:28:50 Calc: threaded Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109195 [Bug 109195] [META] DOCX (OOXML) Footnote and Endnote bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 Justin L changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #8 from Justin L --- (In reply to Francesco from comment #6) > in LibreOffice you see only the first bug (the numbers of the > notes no longer in superscript). I cannot reproduce this in 6.4.7 or master. The first five footnote numbers are all in superscript. (The tops clearly all align with the top of the footnote text, but the bottom of the number is definitely higher than the bottom of the footnote text.) To my eyes, it is identical to Word 2016. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #7 from Francesco --- I send only one page of the original document in word .docx. When you import this document into Libre you see only the first bug (the numbers of the notes no longer in superscript), but not the second (the replacement of numbers with zeros), because this problem arises only when the document is very long (about 554,000 characters). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #6 from Francesco --- Created attachment 167782 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167782=edit Word original document I send only one page of the original document in word .docx. When you import this document into Libre you see only the first bug (the numbers of the notes no longer in superscript), but not the second (the replacement of numbers with zeros), because this problem arises only when the document is very long (about 554,000 characters). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 Justin L changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED|NEW --- Comment #5 from Justin L --- Thanks for the screenshots Francesco. What we really need is the original DOCX file too. Actually, it would be best if you just make a simple, 1 footnote document that demonstrates the problem. If you can't reproduce it in a new document, then attaching the original is OK - and someone else can try to reduce it to a useable problem-demonstrator. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #4 from Francesco --- Created attachment 167774 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167774=edit Comparison between original text and imported text I enclose two screenshots: the first from the original document in .docx (Microsoft Word for Mac, version 16.43); the second from the same text imported into Libre Office (version 7.0.3.1).You can see that the footnote number in the imported text (1) is not in superscript and - (2) second bug not always needed, the number that is replaced by a 'zero' is missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 --- Comment #3 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> --- (In reply to Justin L from comment #2) > I don't think this is a duplicate. That bug report is talking about CREATING > new footnotes, but this one is talking about just importing. The importing > part ought to be identical. We would need to have an example document as > well. I though that a root of the problem is the same. Of course feel free to change a status to NEW if you think differently. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 Justin L changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jl...@mail.com --- Comment #2 from Justin L --- I don't think this is a duplicate. That bug report is talking about CREATING new footnotes, but this one is talking about just importing. The importing part ought to be identical. We would need to have an example document as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138625] The footnote number in an imported word text is not in a superscript, like in the original.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138625 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||79045_79...@mail.ru Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108765 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
