[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2022-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
   ||9961

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||108728


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108728
[Bug 108728] [META] Dictionaries bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-09-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #5)
> it is a standard way of discouraging users from proposing enhancements.

Hopefully not, otherwise apologies.

Point is that not all ideas can be implemented due to effort-benefit balance,
some ideas are very special and seen by many other as feature-creep, we have to
take care of the document standard, have to consider usability and
accessibility etc.

Ideally you describe a scenario, a use case, what you try to achieve. That's
way more easy to agree on than a particular solution. Not saying the idea in
this ticket is bad.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-09-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

--- Comment #5 from Christian Lehmann  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> (In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #0)
> > Expected Results:
> > LO should wait for the user to specify
> > 'Options > Language Settings > Languages > Default Languages for Documents'
> > then install a language-specific custom dictionary and pre-select it in the
> > settings.
> 
> This might be desired by the user, yes. And while I'd appreciate a higher
> flexibility in the installation and more post-hoc customization, I'm afraid
> it's not possible to solve without huge effort.

Heiko, I remember having seen this kind of comment from you before. You are
certainly aware that it is a standard way of discouraging users from proposing
enhancements.

As for the specific proposal made here, please remember that it is intended as
a solution for the untenable situation reported in bug 143290.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-09-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||113458
   Keywords|needsUXEval |topicInfra
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org
  Component|Writer  |Installation
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Christian Lehmann from comment #0)
> Expected Results:
> LO should wait for the user to specify
> 'Options > Language Settings > Languages > Default Languages for Documents'
> then install a language-specific custom dictionary and pre-select it in the
> settings.

This might be desired by the user, yes. And while I'd appreciate a higher
flexibility in the installation and more post-hoc customization, I'm afraid
it's not possible to solve without huge effort.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113458
[Bug 113458] [META] Packaging/installation/removal bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-07-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-07-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-07-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

--- Comment #2 from Christian Lehmann  ---
If I may briefly intervene:

No.

1) The use of a language in a document is independent of the language of the LO
user interface. This must be so, otherwise a user could never compose documents
in different languages.

2) The use of a 'user-defined' dictionary of a particular language does indeed
seem to depend on the prior installation of the corresponding LO language
module. Otherwise Writer appears to ignore the availability of a user-defined
dictionary of the same language. However, this would not seem to be an obstacle
to my proposal. Before composing his own custom dictionary of a language, the
user will typically install the appropriate LO language module.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-07-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cl...@documentfoundation.or
   ||g
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Wouldn't this require multiple installation packages, one for each language?
Quite an effort not only for the package manager but also when you download the
application. Cloph, what do you think?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143308] LO Writer: refine custom dictionary installation

2021-07-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143308

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs