[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146742] The return value of Basic function is not initialized when called from Calc formula
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146742 Andreas Heinisch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |andreas.heini...@yahoo.de |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146742] The return value of Basic function is not initialized when called from Calc formula
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146742 Andreas Heinisch changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Andreas Heinisch --- Confirmed in: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 423773c0054ac8c70c47606113dc0d92af2ac8e2 CPU threads: 6; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-US Calc: CL Imho, we should move the initialization code to SbMethod::Call. I could not think about a scenario where this could lead to an error. I tested some calls including recursions or remaining values in the function calls. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146742] The return value of Basic function is not initialized when called from Calc formula
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146742 --- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski --- Code pointer: BasicManager::ExecuteMacro. But the question arises: isn't it better to move the initialization code to SbMethod::Call maybe, to avoid duplicated code, which is error-prone? Or is there a case where we should not do this? Andreas, what do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146742] The return value of Basic function is not initialized when called from Calc formula
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146742 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo --- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski --- Apso repro using OOo 3.2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
