[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #18 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Disagree with characterizing this as an enhancement. The need for styling tables is recognized, and there is some kind of "styles" (table "designs") already implemented. The bug is that these styles are not proper styles, and therefore don't function properly - see comment #4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|94587 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94587 [Bug 94587] [META] ODF features missing or incorrectly imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||94587 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94587 [Bug 94587] [META] ODF features missing or incorrectly imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||2711 --- Comment #17 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I'll mention that I've filed a "sister" bug about having proper table styles in Writer. Even though I mentioned Writer "Table Styles", they're not proper styles like I asked for here, so my request really regards both modules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|100373 |152652 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 [Bug 100373] [META] Style issues in Draw/Impress https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152652 [Bug 152652] [META] Introduce style categories missing in Impress/Draw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #16 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Just a note that table designs can now be edited and created in Impress and Draw 7.5 / master builds, which you can test here: https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html Relevant commit on gerrit: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/140943/10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 --- Comment #15 from Rafael Lima --- (In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #14) > Turns out I was mistaken, and table templates actually allow setting a > paragraph style (in addition to the paragraph settings specified in the cell > style), see: > https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/ > OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#attribute-table_paragraph-style-name This is good to know... At least it is supported in ODF. It seems ODF allows to define cell styles and paragraph styles, both at the table level and at the cell level. I just don't know how much is actually implemented in LibreOffice. There's no UI to create paragraph styles in Impress. However, I don't know if we could create styles using the API and assign them to tables. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 --- Comment #14 from Maxim Monastirsky --- Turns out I was mistaken, and table templates actually allow setting a paragraph style (in addition to the paragraph settings specified in the cell style), see: https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#attribute-table_paragraph-style-name -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 --- Comment #13 from Rafael Lima --- (In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #10) > FYI, I believe table designs are accessible via the regular UNO style API. I > didn't try myself, but it seems plausible that you can actually create real > table designs from your code. That way you won't need to manually reapply > the formatting each time you add a row etc. Yes you're right, they're accessible via UNO API. I'll look into it and test if it might work in this extension. If it does, it can be a temporary "fix" while we wait for a definitive implementation in master. (In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #10) > Yes. But as a first step we can provide simple context menu actions to > format alternate rows, header rows etc, and wire those actions to the > existing Table Properties dialog, to specify the format for the given cell > role. I actually played with the code a bit, and was able to successfully > change parts of a design using the dialog. I'll keep playing with it; maybe > it will end up with something useful. This would be a great achievement. Let me know if you need help with testing an eventual patch about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 --- Comment #12 from Maxim Monastirsky --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #11) > About dropping table designs OK, there seems to be some confusion here. My comment was actually about dropping text properties from *cell* styles. In comment 5 I explained that table templates use cell styles to store their formatting, and that cell styles can't reference paragraph styles, but instead have their own text format settings (which is btw the case also with graphic styles). On which you replied that "This sounds to me like conceptual duplication" and that it should be dropped. My understanding was that you propose to drop text properties from cell styles, in favor of using paragraph styles. > > It's also exposed to users in cell styles in Calc > > Are you sure? I don't think I see the relation between Calc cell styles and > table designs/templates. Could you elaborate on this a little? I was talking about *cell* styles, see above. > So, let's expand the semantics of "table styles" as existing in ODF to > encompass what "table templates" or "table designs" have now, and get rid of > the latter. I really don't get what you're trying to achieve with this. The end user doesn't care if the style is stored as or as , as long as it works as expected and keeps the table formatted. What's the point in removing one thing, in order to introduce the exact same thing elsewhere. I also believe you underestimate the amount of work needed for such incompatible changes, and the amount of pain this will cause to people whose documents won't open correctly in different software. Why any missing features can't be just considered as part of the current solution? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 151264] Support proper table styles in Impress (and express them in ODF)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151264 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||108237 Summary|Support proper table styles |Support proper table styles |in Impress |in Impress (and express ||them in ODF) --- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #9) > We can't drop this, because it's part of the ODF spec, and used in existing > documents and by other ODF clients. ... > They're anything but redundant, as there is no other way in the ODF spec for > specifying a table design. > There is currently no other "tables styles" that we can implement. When I suggest supporting proper table styles, I mean in ODF too. Will edit bug fields accordingly. About dropping table designs - I meant "When ODF support full-fledged table styles, drop table-designs/templates it modulo backwards compatibility, where we would import table templates/design from older-ODF-version files as proper table styles". > It's also exposed to users in cell styles in Calc Are you sure? I don't think I see the relation between Calc cell styles and table designs/templates. Could you elaborate on this a little? > (And just to clarify - styles with family "table" describe > properties related to a table as a whole, e.g. shadow or page break, and > can't express design aspects of a table, like alternate rows. > In fact, table > template can reference a style from that family in its > element. So basically table templates are a higher level construct, that > reference cell and table styles in order to describe a design of a table.) So, let's expand the semantics of "table styles" as existing in ODF to encompass what "table templates" or "table designs" have now, and get rid of the latter. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108237 [Bug 108237] [META] ODF specification issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
