[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | --- Comment #6 from Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2012-02-20 13:12:39 PST --- set this as assigned as its in-progress -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com 2012-02-17 13:20:54 PST --- so marking a dup of the remove stdlibs bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 46246 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #5 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com 2012-02-17 13:21:44 UTC --- urk - terribly sorry, wrong bug ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 --- Comment #2 from Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2012-02-10 07:28:53 PST --- oh shiny, that's *very* encouraging. With a bit of luck this could take hours off my multi-language build times :-) Well first off I reckon its best to mail your code-to-date and your question again to the general development list libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org to get better and wider feedback but here's my guesses. * Lucene 2.3 is used, but the CLucene stable version is Lucene 1.9.1 compatible. The developers recommend using the Git version, which *is* compatible with 2.3. Is that OK? probably yeah * How exactly is HelpIndexerTool used? I believe both as a command-line tool (as part of a ??? - HelpLinker - HelpIndexer - ???) chain in the build process, and as a run-time component to index help for extensions. Is it desired to keep HelpIndexer as a stand-alone command-line tool, or is that just because it is a Java component currently? I think its desirable to be a standalone command-line tool. It gets used when building the helpcontent2 module, which is really slow for lots of enabled languages. Currently, I ported most of the first part (for Japanese there is a special Analyzer, which I don't know how to test, and there are a bunch of options to check certain things, of which I'm not sure whether they're ever used) The CJKAnalyzer comes with the java lucene to its a special one, but not a custom one belonging to us, *presumably* this means that the lucene world knows any potential gotchas with trying to convert uses of it to clucene, I'm not exactly sure what it does over the generic one, but we've got some Japanese readers who should be able to read the final output of a conversion to see if the quality is sufficient. Question: does creating the ZIP need to be part of this? If so, what is the best way to create the archive? back in the day I the last time I convert the original java HelpLinker to c++ I *cough* just spawned off perl to do the zipping, e.g. see JarOutputStream::JarOutputStream in http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/ooocvs/workspace.helplinker01.patch could grab and re-use that. In the longer run we might expose some more stuff from package/inc to export out a simple zip api, but using (silly) JarOutputStream would do for now * I'm assuming that CLucene will *always* be compiled with TCHAR defined as wchar_t. This is because of my ignorance of how one does portable wide strings in LibreOffice. Please enlighten me. presumably this will just work, FWIW we have an 8bit code unit rtl::OString and a UTF-16 rtl::OUString class in LibreOffice, not sure if we need to bridge from these to whatever CLucene uses at any point, but I'm sure its doable if necessary. * How to incorporate the CLucene dependency in the build process? its sort of tricky to do this, but plenty of examples, e.g. see the libwpd or libcdr or hunspell dirs which are special modules that build extra dependencies. Basically don't worry about this bit, get it converted to clucene and with some luck someone else will handle figuring out how to build clucene itself as part of our build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 --- Comment #3 from Gert van Valkenhoef g.h.m.van.valkenh...@rug.nl 2012-02-10 09:31:05 PST --- Thanks for the comments. I'll look into your suggestions and then send the next version to the general list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 --- Comment #1 from Gert van Valkenhoef g.h.m.van.valkenh...@rug.nl 2012-02-09 13:01:26 PST --- Created attachment 56833 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=56833 Partial implementation (indexing) I wrote a C++ port of the Java-based HelpIndexerTool (or, actually, only the part that does the indexing using Lucene, with a minimal main() that just indexes a hard-coded test directory). Before I go forward, there are a number of questions about how this will be used and what are the constraints etc.: * Lucene 2.3 is used, but the CLucene stable version is Lucene 1.9.1 compatible. The developers recommend using the Git version, which *is* compatible with 2.3. Is that OK? * How exactly is HelpIndexerTool used? I believe both as a command-line tool (as part of a ??? - HelpLinker - HelpIndexer - ???) chain in the build process, and as a run-time component to index help for extensions. Is it desired to keep HelpIndexer as a stand-alone command-line tool, or is that just because it is a Java component currently? * HelpIndexerTool does two things: - Index help files using Lucene, producing intermediate files - Bundle the intermediate files into a ZIP archive Currently, I ported most of the first part (for Japanese there is a special Analyzer, which I don't know how to test, and there are a bunch of options to check certain things, of which I'm not sure whether they're ever used). Question: does creating the ZIP need to be part of this? If so, what is the best way to create the archive? * HelpFileDocument is a simple support class that produces a Lucene Document for a given help file. This is fully ported (as the helpDocument method). * I'm assuming that CLucene will *always* be compiled with TCHAR defined as wchar_t. This is because of my ignorance of how one does portable wide strings in LibreOffice. Please enlighten me. * How to incorporate the CLucene dependency in the build process? The attached code is contributed under under the LGPLv3+ / MPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44681] EasyHack: port to CLucene from java/Lucene ...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Status Whiteboard||EasyHack,DifficultyInterest ||ing,SkillCpp,TopicCleanup Ever Confirmed|0 |1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
