[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Jean-Baptiste Faure changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|regression | CC||jbfa...@libreoffice.org --- Comment #11 from Jean-Baptiste Faure --- It is about using regression keyword, not a regression itself -> regression keyword removed. Best regards. JBF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Foss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Foss --- Not sure. It’s much better than the current state. A checkbox might be better because it requires active user participation and without that it won’t be set. But then again, not all users are familiar with the triaging process and keywords involved. Rob, I guess let’s set this to revolved fixed and open a new bug if dev or qa are not satisfied with this solution. We’ll go from there then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 --- Comment #9 from Rob Snelders --- This is now solved by using PossibleRegression and not Regression anymore. Is this a good solution? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Björn Michaelsen changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.0.0.0.beta1 |unspecified --- Comment #8 from Björn Michaelsen --- not related to a product version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #7 from James --- Tested: the described behavior applies. If version with bug is newer than last worked version, keyword "regression" is added. Rainer describes the edge case that this might be a new bug instead of a regression. @Rob: I find your suggestion of a checkbox most useful. Any chance to add that? Adding that would allow us to not have the keyword added automatically and producing false positives. Setting to NEW. If you think this is bogus, please state your opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Rob Snelders changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #6 from Rob Snelders --- Any news on this? Does it still needs to be changed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 --- Comment #5 from Rob Snelders --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for the nice fix there Rob - lets see what the impact on regression > keywords is now. We could add a label like "Not sure" instead of "None" in > that dialog, to try to make it more socially acceptable to people to state > that they actually don't know whether it is a regression or not. None is for me something different then Not sure. But I want to change this anyway. I just need to see how I can do that. I want a check-box if the bug is a regression and when the check-box is enabled then I want to show the select-box. > > Can we do tool-tips over widgets ? a tag saying "only fill this in if you > have verified that it worked in a previous version" might be helpful. Due to the change I want I don't think this would be necessary then. > > Anyhow - thanks again :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meeks --- Thanks for the nice fix there Rob - lets see what the impact on regression keywords is now. We could add a label like "Not sure" instead of "None" in that dialog, to try to make it more socially acceptable to people to state that they actually don't know whether it is a regression or not. Can we do tool-tips over widgets ? a tag saying "only fill this in if you have verified that it worked in a previous version" might be helpful. Anyhow - thanks again :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Rob Snelders changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #3 from Rob Snelders --- sorry was to soon with my reply. This isn't solved. Now the regression-version needs to be older then the version. That's been changed this week. But what you describe isn't. But it could be a good improvement, and easy to implement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Rob Snelders changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Rob Snelders --- Already solved after hearing from it via the ESC-notes of thursday. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58251] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: Inappropriate "regression" keyword
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Florian Effenberger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||floeff@documentfoundation.o ||rg, programm...@ertai.nl --- Comment #1 from Florian Effenberger --- Adding Rob, who was updating the assistant during the Hackfest, and might have more insight -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
