[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

Andreas Heinisch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |andreas.heini...@yahoo.de
   |desktop.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #22 from Peter Toye  ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #16)
> (In reply to LeMoyne Castle from comment #14)
> > Aron, the SID_xxx values are compile time constants that are available.  If
> > the SID_xxx, RID_xxx tables get messed up LibreOffice will almost certainly
> > crash at start. 
> 
> My bad if I wasn't clear, I was not implying to meddle with the SID_xxx
> constants, I was only referring to the property values stored with those IDs.
> 
> > I think this is working as desired: the Overwrite value will be used if
> > given, but if it's not LibO will only overwrite a file of the same name.  
> 
> No it isn't, it overwrites any file, not only if it has the same URL.
> Plus if the desired behavior is to save over the same file, the store()
> function is designed for that purpose.
> 
> I'm not sure which core save routine in Writer you're reffering to, but if
> you try to overwrite the same file with Save As... (which storeAsURL()
> resembles the closest), it's not going to without asking first.

Is anything happening on this? I reported it 6 years ago and the last comment
was from Aron in 2015! There's not much point in a bug reporting system if the
dev team dno't look at it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #21 from Peter Toye  ---
(In reply to Peter Toye from comment #20)
> Bug is still there in version 5.7.3 (latest stable).

Version: 5.3.7.2 (x64)
Build ID: 6b8ed514a9f8b44d37a1b96673cbbdd077e24059
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.1; UI Render: default; Layout Engine:
new; 
Locale: en-GB (en_GB); Calc: group


Sorry forgot to add this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #20 from Peter Toye  ---
Bug is still there in version 5.7.3 (latest stable).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #19 from QA Administrators  ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #18 from Peter Toye  ---
It's now nearly a year since any comment was made on this subject. Is no-one
looking at this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #17 from Peter Toye  ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #15)

So where does this leave us? At the moment the code and documentation differ -
at least one should change.

> I don't agree that it should ultimately be considered as an issue in the API
> documentation, because the API usage is based on that documentation, and
> users expect the functions to work as described there. If someone wanted to
> use this function, they must've expected that Overwrite would be false by
> default, based on the documentation.
I agree with this, provided that changing the code to reflect the documentation
isn't going to stop existing programs from working.

> If they noticed the contradiction between the documentation and actual
> behavior, and relied on the way it worked, that's a deliberate action (and a
> serious mistake).
One has to rely on the way it works, so it's not a mistake! I could have simply
decided to remember each time I saved that it should be to a different file
(unless I really wanted to overwrite). Of course I didn't and set the Overwrite
flag to prevent overwriting.

> On the other hand there might also be code out there that relies on the
> documented default value of the Overwrite flag, and the bug simply went
> unnoticed.
...and overwrote a file (as happened to me)! 

My personal view is that the code should be changed to reflect the
documentation, which in my opinion is the desired behaviour. But I have no idea
if the LO development team feel that current behaviour should take priority
over documentation. Maybe someone from that team could comment. I'm only a user
so I don't know the correct form to get action, but it's been 8 months since
any comments on this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #15 from Aron Budea ba...@caesar.elte.hu ---
(In reply to lo from comment #13)
 As I have written elsewhere, default behaviour which is destructive should
 be deprecated, but I have a nasty feeling that we are rather stuck with it.
 Apart from modifying the documentation to highlight this behaviour, is there
 anything else we can do? I have done this in the tutorial
 https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Saving_a_document but as I am not an AOO or
 LO developer I don't think I can (or should) modify the basic API
 documentation without the agreement of the devlopment teams. 

I don't agree that it should ultimately be considered as an issue in the API
documentation, because the API usage is based on that documentation, and users
expect the functions to work as described there. If someone wanted to use this
function, they must've expected that Overwrite would be false by default, based
on the documentation.
If they noticed the contradiction between the documentation and actual
behavior, and relied on the way it worked, that's a deliberate action (and a
serious mistake).
On the other hand there might also be code out there that relies on the
documented default value of the Overwrite flag, and the bug simply went
unnoticed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #16 from Aron Budea ba...@caesar.elte.hu ---
(In reply to LeMoyne Castle from comment #14)
 Aron, the SID_xxx values are compile time constants that are available.  If
 the SID_xxx, RID_xxx tables get messed up LibreOffice will almost certainly
 crash at start. 

My bad if I wasn't clear, I was not implying to meddle with the SID_xxx
constants, I was only referring to the property values stored with those IDs.

 I think this is working as desired: the Overwrite value will be used if
 given, but if it's not LibO will only overwrite a file of the same name.  

No it isn't, it overwrites any file, not only if it has the same URL.
Plus if the desired behavior is to save over the same file, the store()
function is designed for that purpose.

I'm not sure which core save routine in Writer you're reffering to, but if you
try to overwrite the same file with Save As... (which storeAsURL() resembles
the closest), it's not going to without asking first.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #14 from LeMoyne Castle lemoyne.cas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #12)
 I'm by no means an expert, but after debugging this issue, the following
 piece of code looks really suspicious:
 
...
 bool bRename = pRename  pRename-GetValue();
 bool bOverWrite = pOverWrite ? pOverWrite-GetValue() : !bRename;

Aron, the SID_xxx values are compile time constants that are available.  If the
SID_xxx, RID_xxx tables get messed up LibreOffice will almost certainly crash
at start. 

I think this is working as desired: the Overwrite value will be used if given,
but if it's not LibO will only overwrite a file of the same name.  

I can see how overwriting a file of the same name can cause data loss and if
one is in that situation then adding a time stamp to the file name will avoid
the loss.  

The default is not exactly false, it is false (=no overwrite) except when the
save would overwrite a file of the same name.  This is a core save routine in
Writer and no one would be happy with a word processor that insisted on asking
about overwrites everytime a file was saved again.  So, in my opinion, the
issue is with the documentation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

Aron Budea ba...@caesar.elte.hu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu

--- Comment #12 from Aron Budea ba...@caesar.elte.hu ---
I'm by no means an expert, but after debugging this issue, the following piece
of code looks really suspicious:

In method SfxMedium::TransactedTransferForFS_Impl, here
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1586 :

SFX_ITEMSET_ARG( GetItemSet(), pOverWrite, SfxBoolItem, SID_OVERWRITE, false );
SFX_ITEMSET_ARG( GetItemSet(), pRename, SfxBoolItem, SID_RENAME, false );
bool bRename = pRename  pRename-GetValue();
bool bOverWrite = pOverWrite ? pOverWrite-GetValue() : !bRename;

The possibilities:
-SID_OVERWRITE is set: that value is used
-SID_OVERWRITE is not set:
-SID_RENAME is set: the opposite of SID_RENAME is used
-SID_RENAME is not set (bRename is false): bOverWrite becomes true =
this is what happens in example 3

I hope that helps. :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #10 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
It seems it's perhaps in fileaccess::TaskManager::endTask but I don't
understand all this part.
I can't help here :-(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #11 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
code pointers
When it's ok:
Breakpoint 5, SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x76e8c50,
rURL=file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test2.odt, 
rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662
1662impl_store( rURL, rArgs, false );
(gdb) p rArgs
$11 = uno::Sequence of length 1 = {{Name = Overwrite, Handle = 0, Value =
uno::Any 1 '\001', State = com::sun::star::beans::PropertyState_DIRECT_VALUE}}

or even:
Breakpoint 5, SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x76e8c50,
rURL=file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test3.odt,
rArgs=empty uno::Sequence)
at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662
1662impl_store( rURL, rArgs, false );


When it's ko:
Breakpoint 5, SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x76e8c50,
rURL=file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt, 
rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662
1662impl_store( rURL, rArgs, false );
(gdb) p rArgs
$13 = uno::Sequence of length 1 = {{Name = Overwrite, Handle = 0, Value =
uno::Any 0 '\000', State = com::sun::star::beans::PropertyState_DIRECT_VALUE}}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||have-backtrace

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #4 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I got this error when
launching macro:
BASIC runtime error.
An exception occurred 
Type: com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException
Message: Unsupported URL
file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test1.odt:
type detection failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
Ok, I had a bug in my macro with file name, the macro runned successfully
completely.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #6 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
Oups, forget what I indicated, I indeed reproduced the pb, here's the error
message for the fourth file:
BASIC runtime error.
An exception occurred 
Type: com.sun.star.task.ErrorCodeIOException
Message: SfxBaseModel::impl_store
file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt
failed: 0x20d.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #7 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
In gdb session with catch throw ErrorCodeIOException, I could retrieved a bt,
here's main part:
 #0  0x2bcb6dbd in __cxa_throw () from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x2ed7c994 in SfxBaseModel::impl_store (this=0x7306430,
sURL=file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt, 
seqArguments=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}, bSaveTo=false) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:3137
#2  0x2ed7457e in SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x7306430,
rURL=file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt, 
rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662
#3  0x2aaac3d59fef in gcc3::callVirtualMethod(void*, unsigned int, void*,
_typelib_TypeDescriptionReference*, bool, unsigned long*, unsigned int,
unsigned long*, double*)
() from
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/instdir/program/libgcc3_uno.so
#4  0x2aaac3d58fc5 in cpp_call (pThis=0x692d600, aVtableSlot=...,
pReturnTypeRef=0x648060, nParams=2, pParams=0x684ba80,
pUnoReturn=0x7fff3c10, 
pUnoArgs=0x7fff3be0, ppUnoExc=0x7fff3c58) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:231
#5  0x2aaac3d599df in bridges::cpp_uno::shared::unoInterfaceProxyDispatch
(pUnoI=0x692d600, pMemberDescr=0x684c9e0, pReturn=0x7fff3c10,
pArgs=0x7fff3be0, 
ppException=0x7fff3c58) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:429
#6  0x2aaad097bd43 in stoc_corefl::IdlInterfaceMethodImpl::invoke
(this=0x684cce0, rObj=
uno::Any {com::sun::star::uno::XInterface = {_vptr.XInterface =
0x7306328}, No data fields}, rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 2 = {...})
at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/stoc/source/corereflection/criface.cxx:706
#7  0x2e4030e3 in SbUnoObject::Notify (this=0x755bbe0, rBC=...,
rHint=...) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/classes/sbunoobj.cxx:2286
#8  0x2f685418 in SfxBroadcaster::Broadcast (this=0x6a23930, rHint=...)
at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/svl/source/notify/SfxBroadcaster.cxx:51
#9  0x2e50ea0e in SbxVariable::Broadcast (this=0x747d8f0,
nHintId=65536) at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxvar.cxx:182
#10 0x2e508773 in SbxValue::SbxValue (this=0x76ce3e0,
__vtt_parm=0x2e81a210 VTT for SbxMethod+16, r=..., __in_chrg=optimized
out)
at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxvalue.cxx:100
#11 0x2e50df92 in SbxVariable::SbxVariable (this=0x76ce3e0,
__vtt_parm=0x2e81a208 VTT for SbxMethod+8, r=..., __in_chrg=optimized
out)
at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxvar.cxx:77
#12 0x2e500f12 in SbxMethod::SbxMethod (this=0x76ce3e0, r=...,
__in_chrg=optimized out, __vtt_parm=optimized out)
at
/home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxobj.cxx:900

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #8 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
(gdb) p seqArguments
$1 = uno::Sequence of length 1 = {{Name = Overwrite, Handle = 0, Value =
uno::Any 0 '\000', State = com::sun::star::beans::PropertyState_DIRECT_VALUE}}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators qa-ad...@libreoffice.org ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of
LibreOffice (4.4.0.3 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of
LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug
behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of
LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not appropriate in this case)

Thank you for your help!

-- The LibreOffice QA Team
This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-02-19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #3 from l...@ptoye.com ---
I tried it with LO 4.3.5.2 under Windows 7 64-bit home premium. No change in
behaviour.

I think that this is an extremely annoying bug, even though the workaround is
to ALWAYS use a property list when calling StoreToURL. The default behaviour
overwrites a file without warning - never good behaviour for a default! At the
very least the documentation should be changed to reflect the current behaviour
of StoreToURL with a great big warning message.

Apache don't seem to agree with me and think it's trivial. Having overwritten a
file (fortunately backed up) by assuming that the documentation is correct I
can't agree!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

--- Comment #9 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
Trying to unwind with gdb, it seems to come from SfxMedium::Transfer_Impl(),
see
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1732

I'll try to find some time to keep on

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237

Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 OS|Windows (All)   |All
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||nopo...@novell.com,
   ||serval2...@yahoo.fr
   See Also||https://issues.apache.org/o
   ||oo/show_bug.cgi?id=121665
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr ---
On pc Debian x86-64 with master source updated today.

Noel: one for you?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs