[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61430] Spellchecker Should Accept (Not Flag) variations based on apostrophe S ('s)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61430 --- Comment #7 from KumÄra kumara.bhik...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Joel Madero from comment #5) @Kumara - the more I think about this the harder it is to implement. In particular the possessive stuff: For instance, what if someone adds a word that is not a noun, so there is no possessive element, then they want to write that word in plural but accidentally type 's instead of just an s - spell check doesn't show this as wrong despite it clearly being wrong. Thanks for thinking about this. On the scenario you raised, I would count it as a grammar problem, rather than a spelling one. I think the occurrence would be rare. Besides, we can leave this to LanguageTool, which I'm playing a minor role in. If we leave this as it is, users who add words not in the dictionary (and they are often nouns) would have to add many more words just because of the apostrophe s. For comparison sake, Eudora (the old email client which I'm *still* using) has an amazingly well thought-out spell-checker. It does what I suggested, and to my knowledge no one has ever complained about it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61430] Spellchecker Should Accept (Not Flag) variations based on apostrophe S ('s)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61430 --- Comment #6 from Urmas davian...@gmail.com --- This should be closed as WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61430] Spellchecker Should Accept (Not Flag) variations based on apostrophe S ('s)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61430 --- Comment #5 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com --- @Kumara - the more I think about this the harder it is to implement. In particular the possessive stuff: For instance, what if someone adds a word that is not a noun, so there is no possessive element, then they want to write that word in plural but accidentally type 's instead of just an s - spell check doesn't show this as wrong despite it clearly being wrong. Can you suggest how we might handle situations like this? I think it could lead to some relatively bad problems with spell check. Maybe something that needs to be discussed with UX team as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61430] Spellchecker Should Accept (Not Flag) variations based on apostrophe S ('s)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61430
Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC||jmadero@gmail.com
Summary|Spellchecker Should Accept |Spellchecker Should Accept
|(Not Flag) Variant Forms of |(Not Flag) variations based
|Words in User Dictionary, |on apostrophe S ('s)
|eg. capitalised words, and |
|those ending with |
|apostrophe S ('s) |
--- Comment #4 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com ---
Sounds like a valid enhancement request...despite myself not wanting such a
smart system ;) Moving to NEW.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
