[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76419] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: display redirect info to redmine, since website bugs are filed there now (was: no version for website bugs)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76419 Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||todven...@suomi24.fi Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi --- Closing as WONTFIX. BSA has gone away and in the (hopefully near) future we will be using BZ's improved guided entry template: http://bugzilla.readthedocs.org/en/latest/integrating/templates.html#particular-templates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76419] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: display redirect info to redmine, since website bugs are filed there now (was: no version for website bugs)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76419 Foss f...@openmailbox.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|BUGZILLAASSISTANT: no |BUGZILLAASSISTANT: display |version for website bugs|redirect info to redmine, ||since website bugs are ||filed there now (was: no ||version for website bugs) Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Foss f...@openmailbox.org --- title adjusted. BSA should display redirect info as soon as user selects www component. Not sure if using more than one tracker is smart though. I understand that redmine has more features than bugzilla but it makes things more difficult to keep track of. Setting to NEW since valid enhancement request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76419] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: display redirect info to redmine, since website bugs are filed there now (was: no version for website bugs)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76419 --- Comment #5 from A (Andy) stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de --- @Adolfo: Thank you for the links. I have taken a look at Redmine and I would also agree with Foss. I think it is better to have only one bug tracker, because for new users or not that experienced users this is really confusing, even if Redmine has maybe better features for WWW bugs. And I don't want to challenge Redmine I only want to say that we should think once more whether it is really good and intuitive to have several systems. In addition, if you go in LO 4.2.2.1 to HELP - SEND FEEDBACK then you will get to the Bugzilla bug tracker and there you can choose the component WWW, but you will not get any information about Redmine and we can not expect that users take the time to study this bug tracking issue more in detail on other further webpages, especially if they find no hint about this on the SEND FEEDBACK webpage. But even then I think it would be easier and more intuitive to have only one system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
