[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 --- Comment #9 from m.a.riosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi --- (In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #8) please file a detailed bug report with a minimal sample document. Just complaining in general, in a comment on a totally unrelated bug report, is not how to do it. Forgive me if I explain bad. I'm not complaining, just the contrary, thinking it could be a future enhancement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 --- Comment #7 from m.a.riosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi --- Thanks for detail and of course for the work. I think understandably now, may be it could be of interest for some users. Truly appreciated to see some focus on performance, IMHO the area more needed of improvement in Calc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 --- Comment #8 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi --- If you have a specific case of a document whose calculations or loading has slowed down from one version of LibreOffice to the next, or is significantly (an order of magnitude) slowed in LibreOffice than in a competing product, please file a detailed bug report with a minimal sample document. Just complaining in general, in a comment on a totally unrelated bug report, is not how to do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi --- Patch committed to master and 4-4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 m.a.riosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@miguelangel.mobi --- Comment #4 from m.a.riosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi --- Sometimes is difficult understand what is not explained. Is the special case a secret? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 raal r...@post.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 --- Comment #3 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi --- To be more verbose, of course I know that RAND() should be be (pseudo-)random in all normal use cases. I am talking about a special case that never would be entered by accident by a normal user. We already have the code for this is master, but I think this bug report is necessary to have a rationale for doing it in the libreoffice-4-4 branch, too. See https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/14053/ . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 --- Comment #2 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi --- You don't understand. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com --- In benchmarking it is necessary to both be able to measure performance, but also correctness. Clearly if we have a benchmark that includes RAND() - it is then hard to check correctness - without being able to force deterministic behavior on RAND. Clearly that is not a common case - but it is vital for this corner-case. We're working on publishing some sensible documents that people can play with too - but that's still in progress. HTH. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88632] For benchmark validation, it would be useful if RAND() optionally would be non-random
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88632 raal r...@post.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@post.cz --- Comment #1 from raal r...@post.cz --- Could you specify this special use cases? I think it's not possible because rand() have to be random. There are not options in rand http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part2.html#__RefHeading__1018560_715980110 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
