[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #11 from Cor Nouws  ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #10)
> Hi Cor,
> You shouldn't change the status back to NEEDINFO once the bug has been
> confirmed by someone.
> Please change the status to RESOLVED WORKSFORME if you believe this bug is
> fixed. Meanwhile, I change it back to NEW

I thought asking was polite, but resolving is fine for me

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW

--- Comment #10 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Hi Cor,
You shouldn't change the status back to NEEDINFO once the bug has been
confirmed by someone.
Please change the status to RESOLVED WORKSFORME if you believe this bug is
fixed. Meanwhile, I change it back to NEW

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

--- Comment #9 from Cor Nouws  ---
Hi tmcalc, *

I have the impression that it works ~fine in a recent daily build and 5.2.1.1
Can you please check this
Thanks!
Cor

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

Robinson Tryon (qubit)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bibisected, perf
 Whiteboard|perf bibisected |

--- Comment #8 from Robinson Tryon (qubit)  ---
Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (bibisected, perf)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

Zangune zang...@users.sourceforge.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||Zangune@Users.SourceForge.N
   ||et
 Whiteboard|perf, bibisected|perf bibisected

--- Comment #7 from Zangune zang...@users.sourceforge.net ---
Removing comma from Whiteboard (please use a space to delimit values in this
field)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard#Getting_Started

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

--- Comment #6 from tmacalp tmac...@gmail.com ---
Here is the bibisect using Matthew's targeted bibisect repo:

7fd8078970675ec1bf6a2972ecfa7cf22455536f is the first bad commit
commit 7fd8078970675ec1bf6a2972ecfa7cf22455536f
Author: Matthew Francis mjay.fran...@gmail.com
Date:   Mon Apr 20 18:32:15 2015 +0800

source-hash-6e61ecd09679a66060f932835622821d39e92f01

commit 6e61ecd09679a66060f932835622821d39e92f01
Author: Armin Le Grand a...@apache.org
AuthorDate: Wed Mar 19 16:17:02 2014 +
Commit: Miklos Vajna vmik...@collabora.co.uk
CommitDate: Fri Mar 28 14:31:08 2014 +0100

Merge back branch alg_writerframes to trunk

(cherry picked from commit b635b4fa4e42053d30ab639643d2236a20243f62)

Conflicts:
comphelper/inc/comphelper/TypeGeneration.hxx
comphelper/source/property/TypeGeneration.cxx
cui/source/factory/dlgfact.hxx
cui/source/inc/cuitabarea.hxx
cui/source/tabpages/tabarea.cxx
cui/source/tabpages/tabarea.hrc
cui/source/tabpages/tabarea.src
cui/source/tabpages/tparea.cxx
drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/polypolygonprimitive2d.cxx
drawinglayer/source/processor2d/vclmetafileprocessor2d.cxx
drawinglayer/source/texture/texture.cxx
editeng/inc/editeng/unotext.hxx
editeng/source/items/frmitems.cxx
include/drawinglayer/texture/texture.hxx
include/editeng/brushitem.hxx
include/svx/sdr/primitive2d/sdrdecompositiontools.hxx
include/svx/svxids.hrc
include/xmloff/xmltypes.hxx
reportdesign/source/ui/misc/UITools.cxx
sc/source/ui/drawfunc/drawsh.cxx
sfx2/source/dialog/tabdlg.cxx
svl/source/undo/undo.cxx
svx/inc/svx/unoshprp.hxx
sw/Library_sw.mk
sw/inc/doc.hxx
sw/inc/format.hxx
sw/inc/frmfmt.hxx
sw/inc/swatrset.hxx
sw/inc/unomap.hxx
sw/inc/unoprnms.hxx
sw/source/core/access/accpara.cxx
sw/source/core/attr/format.cxx
sw/source/core/attr/swatrset.cxx
sw/source/core/doc/docdraw.cxx
sw/source/core/doc/docfly.cxx
sw/source/core/doc/notxtfrm.cxx
sw/source/core/inc/frame.hxx
sw/source/core/inc/frmtool.hxx
sw/source/core/layout/atrfrm.cxx
sw/source/core/layout/paintfrm.cxx
sw/source/core/text/inftxt.cxx
sw/source/core/text/porfld.cxx
sw/source/core/text/txtfly.cxx
sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
sw/source/core/uibase/app/docst.cxx
sw/source/core/uibase/app/docstyle.cxx
sw/source/core/uibase/shells/drawdlg.cxx
sw/source/core/uibase/shells/frmsh.cxx
sw/source/core/unocore/unoframe.cxx
sw/source/core/unocore/unomap.cxx
sw/source/core/unocore/unoprnms.cxx
sw/source/core/unocore/unostyle.cxx
sw/source/ui/fmtui/tmpdlg.cxx
sw/source/ui/fmtui/tmpdlg.src
sw/source/ui/frmdlg/frmdlg.cxx
sw/source/ui/frmdlg/frmpage.src
sw/source/ui/inc/frmsh.hxx
xmloff/source/text/txtprhdl.cxx
xmloff/source/text/txtprmap.cxx

Change-Id: Id3ffaa83bb5594d287f1ac8f2c1c9cf55c70946d

:100644 100644 ebc766b58ab816dcb0d77ff3489c48ce9eb62c32
5ce3b860a652bbd62c8ac61bbb52d71b8386c959 M  ccache.log
:100644 100644 45e1ed288fe14622167796774c2fa897acac51a9
b76f81cdcda017f9d45e555108b12582df670be9 M  commitmsg
:100644 100644 d5c434fb225777c13d577e68312aaa139dc820a9
1a959b061c75392563e1fc29d3bfad6c8a5927b7 M  make.log
:04 04 cf915096292d2ce240cb0a3345a5fb0c717ba7d8
3c65bd4161d0280750215b9fd4824d0896cb019e M  opt



$ git bisect log
git bisect start 'latest' 'oldest'
# good: [3c09a4a6e41c3d0f3ceaddab66b07aae6c2ff8bf]
source-hash-a69209a4152c6e8a64e8467dffa9c4330fd2112f
git bisect good 3c09a4a6e41c3d0f3ceaddab66b07aae6c2ff8bf
# good: [804315cad2149c3e98542313948e396b72a6e827]
source-hash-67780ee7f37f05ebdec0d330361fa80e1f2e0cc8
git bisect good 804315cad2149c3e98542313948e396b72a6e827
# bad: [cb39d1419e8b65ef4736a10ccad6d14ee2054425]
source-hash-1d3e4bc3b65a696d67ef9c157e67a03e8f37e08d
git bisect bad cb39d1419e8b65ef4736a10ccad6d14ee2054425
# good: [1321f7b4401a68f7667c158b891907c5334a616d]
source-hash-c7190108f02921868cb617040aebdb2d22c02c1f
git bisect good 1321f7b4401a68f7667c158b891907c5334a616d
# bad: [d52172f58567951b2d56090365e7ab23fa0cb407]

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

Matthew Francis fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk

--- Comment #5 from Matthew Francis fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk ---
@tmacalp:

Not sure if you got my email, but I built a targeted bibisect repository you
could possibly use to narrow this down further (covering all the commits in the
range you identified) - I would do it myself but I can't reproduce this
locally.

If you're having any problems, feel free to drop me an email or grab me in
#libreoffice-qa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

tmacalp tmac...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||regression
   Priority|medium  |high
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88
   ||678
 Whiteboard||perf, bibisected
   Severity|normal  |major

--- Comment #1 from tmacalp tmac...@gmail.com ---
I'm upping the importance to Major/High because it involves a serious glitch,
making using LO remotely tediously slow.  It is also a regression.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

tmacalp tmac...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |minor

--- Comment #4 from tmacalp tmac...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Joel Madero from comment #3)
 Please don't set the priority for your own bugs - there is no way to be
 objective about it.
 
 IMHO:
 
 Minor - can slow down but will not prevent high quality work;
 High - serious enough regression to be pushed to high
 
 I'm not going to change this one as I don't want to get in some screaming
 war over priorities but objectively, this one is not correct. Major should
 be loss of data, crashes, etc

Setting to High/Minor, as suggested.

For what it's worth, I try to use your bug priority triage flowchart whenever
I'm attempting to prioritize ANY bug, including my own.  According to that
flowchart, loss of data or crashes warrant critical or blocker status, not
major.

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90663] VIEWING: Performance regression when viewing objects with image applied to background

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90663

--- Comment #3 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com ---
Please don't set the priority for your own bugs - there is no way to be
objective about it.

IMHO:

Minor - can slow down but will not prevent high quality work;
High - serious enough regression to be pushed to high

I'm not going to change this one as I don't want to get in some screaming war
over priorities but objectively, this one is not correct. Major should be loss
of data, crashes, etc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs