[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Michael Stahl (CIB) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||michael.st...@cib.de Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |michael.st...@cib.de |desktop.org | --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahl (CIB) --- so it looks like a "list" in Word is defined by a w:abstractNum instance and everything derived from it via w:num is part of the list? i don't find that documented anywhere, but i just read the OOXML numbering stuff for the first time, but this is consistent with a couple documents i made in Word 2013. hmmm comment #6 has a relatively easy to implement fix for this document, but in general a w:num can contain a w:lvlOverride which would require a numbering style in writer's model. perhaps the w:lvlOverride properties could all be set on the paragraph itself where it's applied, but that doesn't appear to be ideal. but it looks like SwList can actually hold arbitrary SwTextNodes - while it does have a "default" list style, you can manually set ListId property on any SwTextNode to add it to a SwList. i'll try to get DomainMapper to do that... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 --- Comment #6 from Justin L--- The key to fixing this will be to pruning out identical list styles. In this case, both style1 and style6 both use abstract style 24 with no modifications. #para style Пункт-3 using list numId=6 ilvl=2 B w:t>C -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 --- Comment #5 from Justin L--- The key to fixing this will be to pruning out identical list styles. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Korrawit Pruegsanusakchanged: What|Removed |Added Attachment #120570|application/download|application/vnd.openxmlform mime type||ats-officedocument.wordproc ||essingml.document -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Telestochanged: What|Removed |Added Keywords||filter:docx Blocks||88173 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88173 [Bug 88173] [Meta] Tracking bug for limitations of DOCX (OOXML) format -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Timurchanged: What|Removed |Added Crash report or|https://bugs.documentfounda | crash signature|tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94 | |819 | See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94 ||819 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Timurchanged: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low Crash report or||https://bugs.documentfounda crash signature||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94 ||819 --- Comment #4 from Timur --- This may be related to Bug 94819 or maybe Bug 76817 or even Bug 50774. A B C https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/brian_jones/2006/12/11/whats-up-with-all-those-rsids/ w:rsid XML tags are inserted in the document file when Track Changes is turned on, or when you use the Compare Documents feature. LO doesn't read that well, but it's easy to say: continue previous numbering. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95848] FORMATTING: Numbering list in DOCX does not continue previous numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95848 Timurchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||gti...@gmail.com Summary|FORMATTING: Numbering list |FORMATTING: Numbering list |in DOCX displayed |in DOCX does not continue |incorrectly |previous numbering -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs