[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2021-12-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #12)
> I suggest to restrict the UI, so that input of negative padding is no longer
> possible.

Setting the minimum value on the GtkAdjustments in
cui/uiconfig/ui/textattrtabpage.ui instantiated in
cui/source/tabpages/textattr.cxx does this.

Loading your document still shows the text with -2cm but I cannot change it,
meaning the dialog shows 0cm and either okaying this or some other positive
value keeps the distance. With some visual glitches I expect the app to crash. 

Running the test in a new document seems to work flawless.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2021-12-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   ||tion.org

--- Comment #12 from Regina Henschel  ---
I suggest to restrict the UI, so that input of negative padding is no longer
possible. @Heiko, wouldn't that be something for you?

A different problem is, how to handle documents, which have already a negative
padding. Any idea? We cannot silently set a negative padding to zero when
resaving the document, because that will unexpectedly change the layout.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2020-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #11 from Regina Henschel  ---
(In reply to Svante Schubert from comment #8)
> I have not looked up OOXML, but it would be interesting to take their
> behavior into account as well.

The corresponding property in OOXML is the attribute "space" of borders. You
find it in "17.3.4 Border Properties". Its value is specified as
ST_PointMeasure simple type, 17.18.68. And there you find "This simple type's
contents are a restriction of the ST_UnsignedDecimalNumber datatype".
And Microsoft restricts is further in its 'Office Implementation Information
for ISO/IEC 29500 Standards Support':
"Word restricts the contents of this simple type to be at least 0 and at most
31."

So OOXML does not use negative values for padding.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2020-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #10 from Svante Schubert  ---
Oh, thank you Regina. I was instantely clicking on the  link and have
not read the paragraph(s) after the list:
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS22/box.html#value-def-padding-width

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2020-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #9 from Regina Henschel  ---
(In reply to Svante Schubert from comment #8)

> By this we would become more interoperable with CSS, which does allow
> negative values (length) in width, margin,  padding, font-size, border-width
> und text-shadow.

Negative padding is not allowed in CSS 2.1.
"Unlike margin properties, values for padding values cannot be negative."
in section 8.4 in https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html

Negative padding is not allowed in upcoming CSS 3.
"Negative values for padding properties are invalid."
in section 4.1 in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-box-3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2020-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #8 from Svante Schubert  ---
We might want to consider to fix this in the export filter of ODF 1.2 and ODF
1.3, still not remove it but extend the standard of ODF 1.4 to allow negative
padding.

By this we would become more interoperable with CSS, which does allow negative
values (length) in width, margin,  padding, font-size, border-width und
text-shadow.

I have not looked up OOXML, but it would be interesting to take their behavior
into account as well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2020-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #7 from Michael Stahl (CIB)  ---
bug still present in LO 7.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2020-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

Michael Stahl (CIB)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||odf odf_validation
 CC||michael.st...@cib.de,
   ||svante.schub...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2019-09-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Regina Henschel,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2018-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel  ---
The error still exists in Version: 6.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 414ef6cb187dd3bbcc917dbedf3c0c1cc8668f60
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-08-21_00:13:04
Locale: de-DE (en_US); Calc: CL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2018-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2017-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #3 from Regina Henschel  ---
The problem is still unsolved in Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 4c99b8a9de59f3c5280ff2944d9f828822897f4a
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default; 
Locale: de-DE (de_DE); Calc: group

A valid solution is to use a fo:clip attribute with a negative offset. That
would result in a different bounding box, but is as good workaround.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2017-09-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of
LibreOffice 
(5.4.1 or 5.3.6  https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of
LibreOffice and 
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave 
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170901

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96066] ODF does not allow negative values in attribute fo:padding, but LO writes negative values

2016-08-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96066

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Aron Budea  ---
Reproduced in LO 5.2.0.4.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs