[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #15 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #14)
> No repro with:
> Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
> Build ID: 386fcf9be786b302cd2c6f85ff6d8d97a6777926
> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: GL; 
> TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-06_01:57:50
> Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL

Same here, let's close.

Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: db17a874af37350b3270932175854ee674447bc1
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.12; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; 
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group
Built on August 11th 2017

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Telesto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tele...@surfxs.nl

--- Comment #14 from Telesto  ---
No repro with:
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 386fcf9be786b302cd2c6f85ff6d8d97a6777926
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-08-06_01:57:50
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bibisectRequest
 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

--- Comment #13 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Adding keyword 'bibisectRequest'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

raal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r...@post.cz

--- Comment #12 from raal  ---
Reproducible with Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: ef34535ceb60d7d63b8d8671e4c6e9e43ffbd17d
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Linux 4.2; UI Render: default; 
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF, Branch:master, Time:
2016-03-27_09:53:05

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Robinson Tryon (qubit)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||perf
 Whiteboard|perf|

--- Comment #11 from Robinson Tryon (qubit)  ---
Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (perf)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Beluga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||todven...@suomi24.fi
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Whiteboard||perf

--- Comment #10 from Beluga  ---
I confirm the CPU burning, but not the pagination error.
When I scrolled through the document a bit, I didn't notice any pagination
weirdness, but I got a fatal error - bad allocation!
I couldn't get a bt.

Let's set to NEW for now.

Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: a7c3a2a9be83686657c06f37d521f9f6d2004ddd
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.1; Render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2015-11-28_04:39:18
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

--- Comment #5 from m.a.riosv  ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #2)
> @jay:
> 
> Is openGL enabled or not ?

I forgot this point, for the above estimations, Yes - 5.0.4, Not - Master,
default values with a clean profile.

> 
> (In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #1)
> 
> > BTW, curious the page style name OOoPageStyle.
> 
> Yeh, the document has a long history ;)

What sounds good about ODF.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Michael Meeks  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Michael Meeks  ---
At least on Linux, with the fixes I pushed I see no bad behavior here; no CPU
hammering, fast load and ~no flickering =)

Can you re-open if it persists ?

Thanks !

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

--- Comment #4 from m.a.riosv  ---
Works fine for me the sample file with:

Win10x64

Version: 5.0.4.0.0+
Build ID: 65bdad52a04dc1f5d771bdfdc8bce23e9ba74296
TinderBox: Win-x86@62-merge-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-5-0, Time:
2015-11-26_16:11:50

After clean profile, takes about 01'35" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 32 Mb takes about 01'34" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 01'14" before CPU goes to zero.

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: dc269d07e8e5d71818bc0a546c3daef4d50eb1c7
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.19; Render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2015-11-27_07:36:59

After clean profile, takes about 03'55" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 32 Mb takes about 03'55" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 01'00" before CPU goes to zero.

Seeing the big difference on times until the CPU load is reduced, the lower is
a 20% less for 5.0.4, maybe it's time to change default memory size for
graphics cache, 48 Mb I think is a low value and acceptable for basic
computers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

--- Comment #8 from m.a.riosv  ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #7)
> (In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #1)
...
> 
> During this time, one of the CPU treads is being hammered before going to
> zero, right?

Right.

> 
..
> Changing these default settings is being discussed in bug 94760.

Thanks for the info, I'll comment there.

Pardon, my mistake about OpenGL active, it's just the contrary, No - 5.0.4, Yes
- Master.

The long time for Master with 20Mb of cache doesn't increase a bit with OpenGL
disable. Also with OpenGL active for 5.0.4 improves a bit. (about 5%)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|FIXED   |---
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #7 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #1)
> Maybe you have lower values in Menu/Tools/Options/Memory - Graphics cache. I
> have 640 Mb - 2,5 Mb - 01:00 hour - 256 objects.

I have the default values - 20 Mb, 5.2 Mb, 00:10, 20 objects.

(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #2)
> Is openGL enabled or not ?

OpenGL is not enabled, as indicated in the description "Threads 2; Ver: 3.13;
Render: default;" (the "default" shows its not using opengl)

(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #4)
> After clean profile, takes about 01'35" before CPU goes to zero.
> With graphics cache: 32 Mb takes about 01'34" before CPU goes to zero.
> With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 01'14" before CPU goes to zero.
[...]
> After clean profile, takes about 03'55" before CPU goes to zero.
> With graphics cache: 32 Mb takes about 03'55" before CPU goes to zero.
> With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 01'00" before CPU goes to zero.

During this time, one of the CPU treads is being hammered before going to zero,
right?

> Seeing the big difference on times until the CPU load is reduced, the lower
> is a 20% less for 5.0.4, maybe it's time to change default memory size for
> graphics cache, 48 Mb I think is a low value and acceptable for basic
> computers.

Changing these default settings is being discussed in bug 94760.

(In reply to Michael Meeks from comment #6)
> At least on Linux, with the fixes I pushed I see no bad behavior here; no
> CPU hammering, fast load and ~no flickering =)

Tried the latest master and no difference in one CPU core being hammered for 4
mins, but atleast is now drops down to zero rather than going to ~70%.

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 4f088f78050ec1c831b31b3bf3d4e8d5197c7daa
Threads 2; Ver: 3.13; Render: default; 
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF, Branch:master, Time:
2015-11-27_18:25:47
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

--- Comment #9 from m.a.riosv  ---
New test: 
Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: b33236bfd25333513823e69fac1bc833ee4b5f6e
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.19; Render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@62-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-11-27_11:30:47

After clean profile, takes about 01'08" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 00'30" before CPU goes to zero.

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: a8860122fecbaa932a48f41a38077f621275be9d
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.2; Render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@62-merge-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-11-27_10:34:00
After clean profile, takes about 01'29" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 00'47" before CPU goes to zero.


With windows TinderBox:Win-x86@39 has symbols, maybe that explain the big
difference.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

--- Comment #3 from Michael Meeks  ---
The CPU being hammered thing is a silly in 5.1.x - that I have a local set of
fixes for - just testing here. Can you test with a build that includes:
ed4d8c89ee954b3c9340583c95e8622a6cb47b3b ? =)

Thanks !

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv  ---
Hi @Jay,

I can't reproduce with Win10x64 Version: 5.0.3.2 (x64)
Build ID: e5f16313668ac592c1bfb310f4390624e3dbfb75.

It shows 396 pages. 115248 words, 660899 characters.

Maybe you have lower values in Menu/Tools/Options/Memory - Graphics cache. I
have 640 Mb - 2,5 Mb - 01:00 hour - 256 objects.

BTW, curious the page style name OOoPageStyle.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96095] Performance regression when opening "Getting Started" in 5.0+

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

--- Comment #2 from Cor Nouws  ---
@jay:

Is openGL enabled or not ?

(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #1)

> BTW, curious the page style name OOoPageStyle.

Yeh, the document has a long history ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs