[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96247] Make lok_doc_view_new() easier to use

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96247

David Tardon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |pranav...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96247] Make lok_doc_view_new() easier to use

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96247

--- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera  ---
The way we discussed fixing this was to:
- install the liblibreofficekitgtk.so in the "normal" libdir
- correctly version the library's soname

The library should know how to get to the "default" (whatever was the target
installation) LO path, and can probably use other means, such as an envvar to
override the default value.

This would make it easier to switch the backend for debugging, but would make
the bindings work out of the box.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96247] Make lok_doc_view_new() easier to use

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96247

David Tardon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from David Tardon  ---
That makes sense. I've been thinking along the same lines.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs