[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #10 from kaese...@gmail.com --- I'd just like to second this, this is a wish I had for YEARS, summing for variables with numerics in them and counting unique values for anything else makes just so much more sense and will save users countless clicks. It would be great if this could be done ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | Component|LibreOffice |Calc CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90 ||665 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #9 from Jaka --- Just agreeing and noting that the wish to have unique counting as an option is tracked here: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90665 I wouldn't say it's a dependency though, since even defaulting to the normal count for non-numeric fields would be welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Pénzes Dávidchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103381 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103381 [Bug 103381] [META] Pivot table (aka Data Pilot) bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze--- I was looking for a reason to change it in general. The more variants we have in the program, like ifthen sum or count, the harder is it for users to figure out why things happens - and the complexity of the code increases. So the question is why not always (row/col, with/without NAN) calculate the number of values? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #6 from raal--- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) > So the question is why not always (row/col, with/without NAN) calculate the > number of values? Because when you change the default (from SUM to COUNT), users will be angry. When you do what Milan suggested, it's clear enhancement. btw. that's the behaviour how Excel works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #7 from Milan Bouchet-Valat--- That's right. Another point is that users already have to take into account different behaviors depending on whether the values are numeric or not: sum produces an empty result when applied to non-numeric values. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat--- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > Sounds reasonable. First step in an analysis should always be the checking > of raw data, here the count of valid numbers, followed by the computation of > descriptive or summative information afterwards. I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. My proposal concerns only columns which contain non-numeric values, for which no summation can be done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Milan Bouchet-Valatchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Component|Calc|ux-advise --- Comment #2 from Milan Bouchet-Valat --- Let's see what the UX team thinks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze--- Sounds reasonable. First step in an analysis should always be the checking of raw data, here the count of valid numbers, followed by the computation of descriptive or summative information afterwards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 raalchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||r...@post.cz Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from raal --- Valid enhancement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97513] In Pivot tables, compute sum for numbers and counts for other formats by default
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Milan Bouchet-Valatchanged: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs