Re: [Libreoffice-qa] guidelines for filing bugs

2012-01-31 Thread Michael Meeks

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:52 -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
 I wonder if it would be a good idea to say, somewhere in the
 wiki pages about filing bugs, something like ...

:-) I'm afraid almost everyone thinks that their problem is obvious,
and that we're morons for not seeing it, or for not even knowing that
that feature exists ;-) That (I think) is one of the (sad) facts of
developer / QA engineer's lives - hopefully we make it up by being
friendly with each other :-)

 Please be patient with requests for information which
 should be obvious: if everything actually was as it
 should be, then there would be no bug to report.
 Similarly, a bug may consist of the program basing an
 output on an input which *should* have nothing to do
 with the calculation of that output.

Yep - hopefully we get people to file bugs via the bug submission
assistant that IIRC makes the need for clarity and self-contained-ness
more clear (at least it should).

 If this is a good idea, I would welcome suggestions about
 wording and a good place to put it.

Trying to customize the freedesktop bugzilla filing flow is (I think)
much harder than making the bug submission assistant cleaner. Hope he
didn't upset Lionel or you anyhow :-)

HTH,

Michael.

-- 
michael.me...@suse.com  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-31 Thread Cor Nouws

Hi Nino,

Nino Novak wrote (29-01-12 14:11)


I'm just a simple user, so maybe my view is a bit naive. But my general
concern/intention is to help improving LibO quality.


Ah great - our whole community exists of simple users and simple 
developers. SO you are perfectly at the right place here :-)


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-31 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi Nino,

Thanks for the thoughts about quality. For those who use Libreoffice quite
frequently, practical general usage of software is pretty valuable to find
issues thus improve quality, even not that surprisingly, it some time reveals
bugs we never found in testing lab :)

I believe the regression testing we are doing quite fits what you care about.

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests

Especially for the mentioned Litmus. It is also a nice place to start to take
part in monitoring bug-free usage:

- Improve cases to share your opinion of daily usage, by improving
existing tests, adding new cases or translating the cases to your own
native language version.

- Run test cases for each release in beta and rc place, mark it as
pass/fail, accordingly report bugs.

- And I believe some of the high priority test cases could be proper
reference when you want to try daily/master build before any
announcement.

Do not hesitate to let us know when you have troubles to handle anything.
Thank you!

Best wishes,
Yifan

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 03:09:03PM +0100, Nino Novak wrote:
 Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 00:05:48 schrieb Cor Nouws:
 
  Ideas, things to add?
 
 Personally I have the impression / concern that Quality is getting one of the 
 main challenges of LibreOffice as it seems to decrease more and more - and 
 software acceptance to a good deal depends on quality (especially in 
 corporate 
 environments).
 
 So anything that /really/ raises quality is good ;-)
 
 My own ideas go into the direction of monitoring bug-free usage, e.g. by 
 logging main user actions (module used, opening/closing files, menu path, 
 toolbar icon klicks and so on) into a simple text file. But I really don't 
 know if this is a good subject to talk about at FOSDEM.
 
 Nino
 ___
 List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
 Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
 Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
 
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/