Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed Bugs
Hi Joel, first, thanks a lot for organizing such an event. It is a good start in any case. Joel Madero píše v Po 06. 08. 2012 v 11:15 -0700: Hi All, Well, we attempted to do a triaging event Sunday and ...it didn't work out well. Hardly anyone showed, and I understand, it was the weekend ;) I guess that we might get better audience in winter. You know, the long cold evenings are better for sitting in front of computer than the current shiny days :-) So I'm attempting something new. What I've done is made a google doc (yes I know, boo, lame, whatever), for now, it was the easiest and fastest way to organize. I have organized based on the component and then grouped in approximately 50 or less groupings. If you have the time (even if it takes a couple months to get through them) PLEASE take a group. I am convinced that it reflects poorly on us that we allow bugs to stay unconfirmed with no comment or anything for months and months and months - I would actually say that alone should be a critical bug ;) So, if you could take a grouping please rename the sheet to your name (or IRC name or some other way you call yourself) and just go through them at your leisure, that would be fantastic. If we could get 10-15 people to commit to a group we could halve the unconfims over the next few months which would be nice for the UA team, for the dev team and for our user base. LINK: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApS-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E#gid=0 Could you please mention it at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage or somewhere around? I think that it might be interesting also for newcomers. Thanks a lot for all your great efforts. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.5.3's docx filter broken completely.
dE . píše v Pá 03. 08. 2012 v 23:21 +0530: On 08/03/12 20:14, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 19:15 +0530, dE . wrote: Since version, 3.5.5.3 the docx filter practically does not work. All it shows is text and formatting; libreoffice cant even detect the file type, it asks to select one. Is there a confirmed / most-annoying-bug about this ? if not I guess we should file one - with platform specific details etc. Of course, this may be a symptom of some file-association fight between Microsoft Office and LibreOffice, and/or some other suite. HTH, Michael. I'm using Gentoo, and libreoffice is launched by plasma/dolphin, and it give this dialog asking about the format. Could you please create a new bug report and attach a test document there? I wonder if it happens only with a particular document or with others as well. Anyway, all these details belongs to bugzilla which is the right place to track bugs :-) Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] RESOLVED status question
Joel Madero píše v Čt 02. 08. 2012 v 14:42 -0700: At what point do we put resolved as a status? Is it when it's committed to master branch? If not then is the developer/qa team expected to continue to check a patchs status after it's already committed to master in order to find out if it's committed elsewhere? Thanks in advance, I'm not positive I've been doing it right :-/ A few I marked as RESOLVED because I know they are fixed in master and will soon be seen by other users as resolved as well. I would mark it as RESOLVED when the fix is pushed in all branches where we want it. IMHO, it means that the work is done from the developer side. We always want it in master. Sometimes, we want to backport it into older products which need some developer input as well. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.6.2 tag created (3.5.6-rc2)
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.6.2 tag (aka rc2). The
corresponding official builds will be available within next few days.
It will be used as final if no blocker is found.
See the attached list of changes against 3.5.6.1.
Now, you might switch your current 3-5 source tree to it using:
./g fetch --tags
./g checkout -b tag-libreoffice-3.5.6.2 libreoffice-3.5.6.2
Linux distro packages might find source tarballs at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/
They will be available from the official page together with the builds.
See also the schedule at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
and release criteria at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Best Regards,
Petr
PS: I deleted and resubmitted the tag half an hour after the initial
push. We needed to add one fix for Windows build. I hope that I did not
cause any troubles with it.
fdo#38056 ODF import: Page Borders handling broken [Michael Stahl]
fdo#46020 FILESAVE [DOC] [DOCX] Loss of footnotes when exporting to DOC- and DOCX- Files [Cédric Bosdonnat]
* {{fdo|38056}} ODF import: Page Borders handling broken [Michael Stahl]
* {{fdo|46020}} FILESAVE [DOC] [DOCX] Loss of footnotes when exporting to DOC-
and DOCX- Files [Cédric Bosdonnat]
+ common
+ version 3.5.6.2, tag libreoffice-3.5.6.2 (3.5.6-rc2) [Petr Mladek]
+ core
+ fix windows build where min and max are macros [Fridrich Štrba]
+ fix XMLTextImportPropertyMapper regression: (fdo#38056) [Michael Stahl]
+ fixed missing footnote docx/doc/rtf export (fdo#46020) [Cédric Bosdonnat]
+ some tweaks in RTF filter [Michael Stahl]
+ translations
+ update translations for LibreOffice 3.5.6 rc2 [Andras Timar]
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug triage workflow
I will hopefully get a chance tonight to play around with the wiki a bit. I'll get the odg document up and put it under commons license :) Joel P.S. I think separating the triaging page from priotizing (severity) page isn't the best idea, any opinions from other people? Seems like all triaging should be on the same page, including devs we may want to CC for a particular bug. On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: Hi Joel, Joel Madero píše v Út 31. 07. 2012 v 07:02 -0700: It's terribly located, I'll fix it today. It's on the right page but just not very clear: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Severity If you scroll down you'll see a link to it but it's small and not very easy to find. Direct link is here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/0/06/Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg BTW: Is also the original .odg document in wiki? It would be cool if you could put it there with a reasonable license. It would help to improve the already nice diagram in the future. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug triage workflow
Hi Joel, Am 07.08.2012 17:11, schrieb Joel Madero: I will hopefully get a chance tonight to play around with the wiki a bit. I'll get the odg document up and put it under commons license :) If you mean the odg document as source for [1] I have two comments: 1) Place Word no not vertical, but horizontal. 2) Disposal of the odg document to localize in other languages (and then converting to a jpg document). [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/0/06/Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg Regards Jochen ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
