Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Esc Call Notes
Am 13.09.12 18:20, schrieb Joel Madero: These are just a few of the things that pertained to QA 5. MAB 1. There really shouldn't be any put to 3.7 from what I understood Well, if and only if a bug * is NEW in the 3.7 daily builds (i.e., is not reproducible in 3.6) and * is really annoying, it _should_ be added to the LibreOffice 3.7 Most Annoying Bugs list: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54157 For details about our MAB procedure, please see https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Most_Annoying_Bugs Best regards, Roman ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Esc Call Notes
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: These are just a few of the things that pertained to QA 1. Calc (3.6) crashing 1. bugs discussed, we need to go through the Unconfirmed and verify. The NEW ones are being looked at by the developers 2. HardHacks 1. Previous email sent out, we need to finalize the process 2. Developers have gone through the hard hacks, a continuous list is preferred (max of 5-7 bugs at a time, refilling these as they are taken care of is best 3. See previous email for suggestions 3. Triaging 1. Begged for more help for back log ;), some interested but suggestion of bug hunting session. Time difference could be an issue, can someone else in Europe try to arrange this? If it's over the weekend I may be able to join, otherwise very hard 2. There are 30ish students from Hungary (I believe?) doing development, asked for more EasyHacks to work on, I suggested that maybe they could help triage and maybe find their own EasyHacks (not sure what the result of this was) 4. EasyHacks 1. Like above, need more EasyHacks marked, people are available to deal with them but there aren't enough out there 2. My comment: I'm seeing things marked as EasyHack without the entire list of things that we usually should put for easy hack (particularly bt if possible, and some direction as to where to look in the code) 5. MAB 1. There really shouldn't be any put to 3.7 from what I understood 6. Resolved Status 1. Only mark as Resolved if it's resolved in latest stable, not if it only works in latest master (a comment can be put in if it's working on latest master) 2. WORKSFORME unless you know for sure the bug was assigned and dealt with by a developer, in which case ask them to mark as RESOLVED - FIXED or mark it yourself (again only if you're sure that it wasn't just coincidentally fixed, or just works for you and you're not sure if the particular bug was dealt with) 7. Issues regarding rudeness on FDO 1. Michael dealt with the one case, banning a user is probably more problematic than it's worth. 2. Creating a wiki page (Joel) to kind of address this, something along the lines of What is not useful in reporting a bug I think that was about it, if I missed something, my apologies. Best Regards, Joel I have a question about the old Bug ticket dating back to 2011. How long should we keep a ticket open if we are requesting additional information on the ticket. is it safe to resolved them to resolvedinvalid ? -- -- Masekela Walls Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Esc Call Notes
2012/9/13 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com: There are 30ish students from Hungary (I believe?) doing development, asked for more EasyHacks to work on, I suggested that maybe they could help triage and maybe find their own EasyHacks (not sure what the result of this was) There have been 13 since last year (not 30). I've got 0-5 in one time, currently I have 1, he is working on fdo#41737. I would love, if students could find their own EasyHacks, but in most of the cases they need guidance. They work on the project only for 6 weeks, and this is very short. I was thinking of putting not-so-great coders on bug triage, but I did not do that. They need to produce code in the first place. When new students come, probably I'll do it a little bit different, and have them work ~1 hour a day on bug triage. I think that would make a difference. Best regards, Andras ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] odf_validation bugs
Hi Michael! I have two web instances of ODF validators here: - ODF Toolkit based http://odf-validator2.rhcloud.com/odf-validator2/ - Office-o-tron based http://odf-validator2.rhcloud.com/officeotron-0.7.0/ Maybe it can be useful for you. Best! Gustavo Pacheco. 2012/9/14 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com dear QA people. it has come to my attention that a bunch of ODF validation bugs were mis-handled variously this week. please note: 1. these bugs are about ODF files that LO writes that are not valid according to the OASIS ODF specification; whether or not LO or any other application can open the bugdoc without apparent loss of content is not at all relevant and does not merit closing the bug 2. there should be one bug for each invalid element or attribute that is written; these are most likely caused by entirely unrelated bugs in the export filter, and resolving all of them as duplicate is about as helpful as resolving all crash bugs as duplicate of a single LO crashes bug 3. http://opendocumentfellowship.com/validator appears to support only ODF 1.0 which makes it useless 4. apparently the only known web instance of the ODF Toolkit ODF validator is currently down; therefore i've built the thing from source and uploaded it here[1], you can run it via java -jar odfvalidator*.jar odf-file-or-directory...; please note it defaults to the conforming mode for 1.2 files so set your Office to version 1.2 without extensions, or use -e option (extended conforming) 5. please add odf odf_validation to the whiteboard if a validation bug doesn't have these yet thanks, michael [1] http://people.freedesktop.org/~mst/odfvalidator-1.1.6-incubating-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Please Triage These (Bugs from 2011)
Joel Madero schrieb: There are 12 bugs from 2011 that haven't been triaged. Hi all, yes, it's very important that we do not forget old bugs, thanks to Joel for reminder. But may I ask you to concentrate on tests for 3.6 for the next time, at least until 3.6.2.2 is out? The time period between the RC has been increased to enable QA to do more tests, and it's important that that chance will be used. Today we still have more than 250 UNCONFORMED bugs for 3.6 reported since 2012-08-01, what urgently need review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=362triagesharer_id=19321 Additionally MozTrap should be used for rc testing, this tool needs our attention. When the stressful pre 3.6.2 period is over we can obliterate those old UNCONFIRMED slurs in order to convalesce. I added a reminder to Jeols mail in my calendar. Best regards Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.2 RC1 available
Dear Community, The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release candidate of LibreOffice 3.6.2. The upcoming 3.6.2 will be the second in a series of frequent bugfix releases, for our feature-packed 3.6 branch. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.6.2 RC1 is not ready for production use, you should continue to use LibreOffice 3.6.1 for that. The release is available for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X from our QA builds download page at http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Should you find bugs, please report them to the FreeDesktop Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org A good way to assess the release candidate quality is to run some specific manual tests on it, our TCM wiki page has more details: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests#Full_Regression_Test (and the announcement mail: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-December/022464.html) For other ways to get involved with this exciting project - you can e.g. contribute code: http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ translate LibreOffice to your language: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Translation_for_3.5 or help with funding our operations: http://challenge.documentfoundation.org/ A list of known issues and fixed bugs with 3.6.2 RC1 is available from our wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.6.2/RC1 Let us close again with a BIG Thank You! to all of you having contributed to the LibreOffice project - this release would not have been possible without your help. Yours, The Document Foundation Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint pgpX2GnyDm4cZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
