[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.0 RC4 test builds available for smoketesting
Hi *, QA found a number of problems that were initially addressed via a hotfix for the Linux packages, but then resulted in a fully new build today - we're now uploading builds of LibreOffice 4.1.0 RC4 to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab them here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs, especially regressions relative to prior RCs here, so we can incorporate them into the release notes. Please note that it takes approximately 24 hours to populate the mirrors, so that's about the time we have to collect feedback. The list of fixed bugs vs. 4.1.0 RC3 is available here http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-libreoffice-4-1-0-release-4.1.0.4.log I'd like to especially ask QA volunteers from the following locales, to please verify the fix of fdo#67093: as bg br gl lt pt-BR pt ru sv te uk zh-CN zh-TW Thanks a lot for your help, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Version Management
Hi, On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:35:04PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (23-07-13 11:15) > > >Hmmm, IMHO the real solution would be to extend bibisect to that range. OTOH, > >doing that is such a pain ... > > I have some older installations. Unless I am mistaken, most of the > list below > > LO330beta3 > LibO330 > LibO330beta2 > LibO331rc2 > LibO332 > LibO333rc1 > LibO334rc1 > LibO340rc2 > LibO341rc3 > LibO342rc2 > LibO342rc3 > LibO343rc1 > LibO343rc2 > LibO344rc1 > LibO345rc1 > LibO345rc2 > LO346rc1 > daily02 > > So if really needed, I can do some tests there. That would be awesome! Currently there are only some 23 unresolved "bibisect*older" bugs: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?x_axis_field=component&y_axis_field=version&z_axis_field=&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=LibreOffice&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=PLEASETEST&resolution=---&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=bibisect+older&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_id=&bug_id_type=anyexact&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&emailtype3=substring&email3=&chfieldvalue=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&j_top=AND&f1=noop&o1=noop&v1=&format=table&action=wrap it would probably be helpful to triage those down to an exact version -- although my fear is most will end up being introduced with the "big merge" between 3.3 and 3.4. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Version Management
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (23-07-13 11:15) Hmmm, IMHO the real solution would be to extend bibisect to that range. OTOH, doing that is such a pain ... I have some older installations. Unless I am mistaken, most of the list below LO330beta3 LibO330 LibO330beta2 LibO331rc2 LibO332 LibO333rc1 LibO334rc1 LibO340rc2 LibO341rc3 LibO342rc2 LibO342rc3 LibO343rc1 LibO343rc2 LibO344rc1 LibO345rc1 LibO345rc2 LO346rc1 daily02 So if really needed, I can do some tests there. -- - Cor Nouws - http://nl.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Version Management
Hi, On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:02:40PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > we know that some distros are still using 3.4 (RHEL) and 3.5 (Ubuntu 12.04 & > 12.10), Ubuntu 12.10 has LibreOffice 3.6 > Also, I'd like to get feedback about a version "pre-bibisect" - > right now we just mark these as 3.5beta0 as it's "at least that old" > but that's not really incredibly accurate as to the level of triage > work that has been done. Pre-bibisect instead would say "3.5 or > older" which is as far as we can prove if the bug appears in > earliest bibisect package. Hmmm, IMHO the real solution would be to extend bibisect to that range. OTOH, doing that is such a pain ... Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
