Hi Joel All,
Thanks for the announcement in the list of my whiteboard suggestion.
In my limited period in QA, i've mainly come across bugs that i've
finished triaging but dont feel comfortable closing without a mentors
second opinion. Other times, i've finished triaging and the bug reporter
believes libreoffice should do something different than whats its doing
and i cant judge if i agree with him or not, so i've wanted a mentors
second opinion.
Maybe we need another whiteboard called NeedQASecondOpinion. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/09/2014 10:46 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
Jay asked about this new status to parallel the NeedAdvice which is a
call for developers to get involved. I went ahead and said +1 so it's
added to the whiteboard wiki:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced
So my advice is for experienced QA members (feel free to self
categorize yourself ;) ) to keep a lookout for these. For new QA members
- feel free to use this (although try to use it sparingly ;)) if you
just really aren't sure about where an UNCONFIRMED bug belongs.
Thanks!
Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
