[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98374] Correct the list of disabled shortcut keys per OS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98374

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |c...@nouenoff.nl,
   |.freedesktop.org|tietze.he...@gmail.com,
   ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98374] New: Correct the list of disabled shortcut keys per OS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98374

Bug ID: 98374
   Summary: Correct the list of disabled shortcut keys per OS
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-b...@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: philip...@hotmail.com
CC: er...@redhat.com,
libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org,
rb.hensc...@t-online.de
Blocks: 98259

When my question regarding why various shortcut keys were disabled in the
keyboard shortcuts customization dialog was forwarded to the developers mailing
list and i received replies from both Regina and Eike that some were disabled
due to accessibility and others were disabled due to Calc's default functions
(weird that disablement only happens on linux), i went through the HIGs for
Windows, Mac and Linux and concluded that most of these restrictions should be
removed and another set of restrictions need to be added per OS. Only if the OS
itself is blocking the use of a shortcut key, should LO not allow a user to
assign that shortcut key, else if a user wishes to change the key, there
shouldnt be any restrictions on it.

These are the commands that should likely be retained and we could make it
cross platform.

Alt + F4 - reserved on Windows
Ctrl + Alt + F4 - reserved on Linux

We could expand on these and based on HIG recommendations restrain users for
very important shortcuts like these.

Help - F1: Windows & Linux, Cmd + Shift + ?: Mac
Context Menu - Shift + F10: Windows & Linux (reserved on Mac)

All the research was can be found in this google doc.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Aek0chOK2h3bBUe1J0bObjbTSOgau_HMeMJ5ws-dM58/edit?usp=sharing

The LO code that does this restriction is here.

http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx#108

So step 1 would be to trim down the existing list and step 2 would be to add
entries not presently found in the list that should likely be disabled based on
each OS's HIG.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98372] SIDEBAR: Research/Reference sidebar deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98372

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #3 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2)
> @Jay, oh my goodness! Is that you?

@Stuart: Yep its me. :D

> We don't actually need to do this as a LibreOffice core feature. Especially
> as the Sidebar Deck is a perfect container to encourage extension developers
> to build content panels against.

I guess i'd have to disagree, as extension imagine if each provider created
their own extension, what would the sidebar turn into. It is better that we
create the core functionality and let providers (most of which wouldnt spend
the time to create their own extension) create just the minimum needed
integration to enable their service to function within it. We are doing the
same thing with the GSoC project to revamp the gallery sidebar tab so that it
can search online providers like openclipart, which used to be its own
dedicated panel until the sidebar arrived.

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GSoC/Ideas#Revamp_the_gallery_tool

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98372] SIDEBAR: Research/Reference sidebar deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98372

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsDevEval, topicUI
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
   |.freedesktop.org|
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
There is a large collection of searchable reference sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_online_databases
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_online_encyclopedias
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_online_dictionaries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_machine_translation_applications

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98270] UI Make Calc's 'Search in all sheets' option more accessible

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98270

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jmadero@gmail.com,  |philip...@hotmail.com
   |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
   |.freedesktop.org|
  Component|ux-advise   |Calc

--- Comment #2 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
Definitely a valid enhancement to the user experience.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98320] EDITING: Colored frames of adjoined cells are hard to distinguish

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98320

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsDevEval, topicUI
 CC|jmadero@gmail.com,  |er...@redhat.com,
   |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com,
   |.freedesktop.org|vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
  Component|ux-advise   |Calc

--- Comment #4 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
So i tried Gnumeric and Calligra Sheets and they have similar behaviours as
Calc and Excel.

Making the frames thicker inwards in the cells might be beneficial to make it
easier to distinguish the colors, but having a fill highlight inside the
selected cells would likely be better, similar to WPS.

@Eike: Is any of this possible?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98320] EDITING: Colored frames of adjoined cells are hard to distinguish

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98320

--- Comment #3 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
Created attachment 123160
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=123160=edit
how it looks in WPS/Kingsoft

With WPS, it uses a color fill highlight on the current selection that can be
modified, so you can easily see one the relevant one.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98320] EDITING: Colored frames of adjoined cells are hard to distinguish

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98320

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||philip...@hotmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
Created attachment 123159
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=123159=edit
how it looks in excel

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98362] Nonsense behavior interpreting input

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98362

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jmadero@gmail.com,  |er...@redhat.com,
   |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |philip...@hotmail.com
   |.freedesktop.org|
  Component|ux-advise   |Calc

--- Comment #5 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
So i tested other spreadsheet apps and Excel, WPS, Quattro Pro and Google Docs
kept it as text, while Calligra and Gnumeric changed it to a number.

I'd assume the best person to explain this behaviour and whether its a bug is a
Calc dev. @Eike: Any thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98362] Nonsense behavior interpreting input

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98362

--- Comment #4 from teo8...@gmail.com ---
Yeah but what do you mean by "treat like a number"??

If you type "1 ljsbf" you don't expect it to be transformed into "1", do you?
(it doesn't happen)

If you type "lsdls" you don't expect it to become "0", do you?
(it doesn't happen)

So why should "1+" become 1, and even more absurd, why should "1-" become -1?


In other words, Calc usually "assumes you are entering numbers" **unless** you
enter something that cannot be interpreted as a number.

In what notation is "1+" a representation of 1 as a number, and "1-" a
representation of -1 as a number?

Your argument is valid for an input like "1e2" (which one may enter with the
intention of entering text but is also 100 in exponential notation), but "1-"
is not a number in any way, I don't see how anybody could expect it to be
interpreted as -1.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98362] Nonsense behavior interpreting input

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98362

Joel Madero  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
  Component|Calc|ux-advise
Version|5.0.5.2 release |Inherited From OOo
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Joel Madero  ---
To me this is a toss up whether we want that behavior or not. 

Setting to ux-advice so they can decide if it's a bug.

FWI - you can get the desired behavior by just formatting the cell as text. The
algorithm assumes you're using calc for numbers (which is generally a decent
assumption) so if you only have 1- it's treating it like a number, different
users will have different expectations as to whether that assumption is right
or wrong. So, default behavior should be decided by UX crew.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 88122] Easy access to switch between native and LO's custom dialogs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88122

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #3 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
Now that bug 86703 has been implemented, this isnt important from a CMIS
perspective.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98270] UI Make Calc's 'Search in all sheets' option more accessible

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98270

Joel Madero  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||jmadero@gmail.com,
   ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
  Component|Calc|ux-advise
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Joel Madero  ---
Requesting UX input.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98319] EDITING: No colored cell names in the input line

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98319

Joel Madero  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||jmadero@gmail.com,
   ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
  Component|Calc|ux-advise
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Joel Madero  ---
Pushing to UX team.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 98320] EDITING: Colored frames of adjoined cells are hard to distinguish

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98320

Joel Madero  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||jmadero@gmail.com,
   ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
  Component|Calc|ux-advise
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Joel Madero  ---
@Tobias - please keep it to one suggestion/bug per report :)

That being said, pushing this to the UX team to look at.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97511] Handling of Q_MOD1 +Q in menus -- not functional from OOo

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97511

Stéphane Aulery  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||http://bugs.debian.org/8120
   ||81

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97511] Handling of Q_MOD1 +Q in menus -- not functional from OOo

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97511

Stéphane Aulery  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lk...@free.fr
   See Also||http://bugs.debian.org/8041
   ||74

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise