[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92286] Do not select automatically the first recent typeface

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92286

Yousuf Philips (jay)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||102985


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102985
[Bug 102985] [META] Font bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 56301] Allow user to edit document with Special Characters dialog open ( convert to non-modal)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56301

Yousuf Philips (jay)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Allow user to edit document |Allow user to edit document
   |with Insert Special |with Special Characters
   |Characters open |dialog open (convert to
   ||non-modal)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 56301] Allow user to edit document with Insert Special Characters open

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56301

Yousuf Philips (jay)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|34882   |
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
   ||882


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34882
[Bug 34882] Special character dialog rework (comment 28 for scope)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 102868] No "jump back" option, after jump to another cell ( with Cell Name box, TLHC of the sheet), to return to the previous cell address

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102868

--- Comment #2 from Dean  ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #1)
> Hi Dean,
> 
> Don't we already have that :) ..
> I like the idea.
> Set to New.
> 
> Any suggestion for a key or..?
> Since Ctrl+Shift+F5 puts focus in Name Box, maybe Alt+Shift+F5 ?

Sorry for the delay in replying.

Your suggestion above looks fine to me.

Thanks for the prompt consideration of "suggestion".

Dean

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 102238] START CENTER: Templates should be activated with single click

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102238

Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 102238] START CENTER: Templates should be activated with single click

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102238

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:5.3.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 102922] Password fields should use “•” as masking character instead of “*”

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102922

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:5.3.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 102922] Password fields should use “•” as masking character instead of “*”

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102922

--- Comment #4 from Ilya Ponamarev  ---
Pull request created - https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/29532/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92657] Questionable Default for Bullet Sizing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92657

--- Comment #7 from Frank  ---
Great illustration; I should have done something like that in the first place.
Be aware that the differences illustrated can vary from subtle to glaring
depending on the particular font and point sizes used.

But, yes - that's indeed the problem I was describing.

A word of caution, though, if you're about to grab this bug to work on: The
more I've looked into this, the more I get the distinct feeling that it might
actually be a way more frustrating thing to address than it appears on the
surface. So grab plenty of your favorite snacks and beverages before diving
in!!

Thanks for the quick response ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90195] Hiding the menu bar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90195

--- Comment #17 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Hidding of the main Menus should probably not be by global shortcut. Just a
View menu or Tools -> Options -> View configuration/Expert configuration. Or if
hidden as controlled by UI as the Notebookbar does on the Tabbed view.

So use the F10 key would be to _only_ unhide the menu if hidden and not toggle
it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90195] Hiding the menu bar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90195

--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote  ---
For a shortcut assignment, I'd suggest we simply continue to use the F10 key.

F10 now directs focus (cursor and program) to the Main menu, extending its
behavior to now unhide the menu should be trivial. And would keep the UI
consistent.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92657] Questionable Default for Bullet Sizing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92657

--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Created attachment 127828
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=127828=edit
Bullets with measure lines

You mean the unnecessary substitution of Liberation Serif by OpenSymbol
corrupts the line spacing. It's also visible in Windows, depending on the zoom
factor (trying to illustrate with measure lines).

If that's true I would agree that we have a bug - if there is no other reason
to use OpenSymbol as default.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90195] Hiding the menu bar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90195

--- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #14)
> Szymon create a .uno:Menubar command to toggle the visibility of the main
> menu for use with the notebookbar, which i believe uses the same code the
> full screen uno command.
> 
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/28044/
> 
> So what is remaining is
> 
> 1) Assigning a shortcut
> 2) Auto unhiding it with the Alt key (tomaz's comment 4, comment 10 and bug
> 69959)

Semantically the mini menu (black/white ODF icon) of the "Tabbed" layout of the
Notbookbar names it a "Menubar"--but that is probably not ideal--it should just
be "Menus". 

Pedro suggested in bug 69959 having a View -> Toolbars toggle for the Menu.

But it feels like the "Menus" control should be a direct toggle at top level of
the View menu--not pushed down into the Toolbars split button list. 

Looking at the View menu (Writer) from a recent master, it is getting kind of
crowded in the Toolbars section, so placing it there would be questionable.

Toolbar Layout
Toolbars
Notebookbar
Status Bar
Rulers
Scrollbars

Do we need a separator between Notebookbar and Status Bar?

So where to place the "Menus" entry, I'd say probably a top level toggle entry
in the Sidebar and Navigator section of the View menu, linked to the
.uno:Menubar command.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92824] limit the number of right-click autocorrect suggestions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92824

--- Comment #9 from tommy27  ---
Created attachment 127827
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=127827=edit
F7 dialog

here it is

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 95779] [RFE] OCR mode in Writer

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95779

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Writer's scope is surely not to be the swiss-army knife. And the interest for
this idea was low in the last year, so I'll close it as WONTFIX.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 94699] Freehand tool: turning off smoothing activity

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94699

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze  ---
While I still believe the freehand tool is well suited for its purpose
following Stuarts argumentation is also good. Setting to NEW.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 94676] Calc autofill confused, hyphen vs. minus

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94676

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Excel autofill:
aaa-bbb-ccc-03  aaa-bbb-ccc+01  1   -3
aaa-bbb-ccc-04  aaa-bbb-ccc+02  2   -2
aaa-bbb-ccc-05  aaa-bbb-ccc+03  3   -1
aaa-bbb-ccc-06  aaa-bbb-ccc+04  4   0
aaa-bbb-ccc-07  aaa-bbb-ccc+05  5   1
aaa-bbb-ccc-08  aaa-bbb-ccc+06  6   2

LibO 5.3 autofill:
Aaa-bbb-ccc-03  Aaa-bbb-ccc+01  1   -3
Aaa-bbb-ccc-02  Aaa-bbb-ccc+02  2   -2
Aaa-bbb-ccc-01  Aaa-bbb-ccc+03  3   -1
Aaa-bbb-ccc00   Aaa-bbb-ccc+04  4   0
Aaa-bbb-ccc01   Aaa-bbb-ccc+05  5   1
Aaa-bbb-ccc02   Aaa-bbb-ccc+06  6   2

LibO counts more reliable as the combined cells are treated like the numbers.
And if you pull up instead of pull down, starting for instance in row 10 with
Aaa-bbb-ccc05, you end up at row 1 with Aaa-bbb-ccc-04. Excel, however, goes
from 05 down to 00 and then up again to 04. Better file a bug report at
Microsofts bugtracker... :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 86601] CONTEXT MENU: Easy access to lock object position and size

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86601

Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|easyHack|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 93205] Implement transparency and masks in layers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93205

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
As Regina said, ODF define layers very clearly as just a grouping feature. If
you want a transparency "layer" you should fill it completely with a shape and
apply the transparency for this object.

The enhancement request WONTFIX because we follow the ODF specification.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92657] Questionable Default for Bullet Sizing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92657

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Bullets and numbering > Position of your example has the values of
* aligned at 18pt
* tab stop at: 36pt
* indent at: 36pt
(given you run units in points; didn't double check the defaults in my
installation).

And when I understand your proposal right you want the default to be
* 0pt
* 18pt (or ~0.5cm/0.2")
* 18pt

I don't see the need to change the vertical spacing. You do not win a lot of
space, and the text will be wrapped anyway. More relevant is that a list,
whether numbered or not, is subordinate to the topic. The indentation makes
sense.

Setting to NEW to get more opinions.

About OpenSymbol: I don't get this. But you should file different bug reports
in any case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92824] limit the number of right-click autocorrect suggestions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92824

--- Comment #6 from tommy27  ---
still present in LibO 5.1.5.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 76128] FORMATTING: Calc Page Style Scaling Mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76128

--- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze  ---
What we have is 
* Reduce/enlarge printout
  + 100% means original = default
  + > or < 100% is what the label states
* Fit to width/height
  + width or height set to a high number fits the content accordingly
  + width or height to a reasonable number defines precisely the export
* Fit to a number of pages
  + takes the height into account for the number of pages

Thinking about fit to n pages makes me wonder if it's possible to have a
certain width _and_ height at the same time. And if these options are
exclusively we could have the scaling options like this

( ) Don't scale
(o) Fit width to 1/n pages
( ) Fit height to 1/n pages
( ) Scale proportionally to 100/n %

The 'do not scale' convenience option is for users who don't want to meditate
about what happens in case of 100%.
Numerical stepper allow to set a maximum. Showing the number of pages in
respect to the alternative option as default could be helpful.

In a second thought the exclusive nature of width/height is not so clear
anymore. But I'd still make the choice as simple as possible. Users who want to
scale in both dimensions have the proportional option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise