[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 133417] EDITING: Insert checkbox easily as in Google Sheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133417 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from BogdanB --- Please tell me if this helps you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 133417] EDITING: Insert checkbox easily as in Google Sheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133417 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g --- Comment #1 from BogdanB --- Try this: Tools - Customize - Toolbar - search for "Check" and insert CheckBox icon. For future use just one click. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136421] switch LibO layout and back delete user specific settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136421 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Blocks||107636 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107636 [Bug 107636] [META] User profile (user data/settings) bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 133886] Libreoffice Calc Subtotals check all columns at once
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133886 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 133417] EDITING: Insert checkbox easily as in Google Sheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133417 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136414] Page Style dialog, does apply do what it supposed to do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136414 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136421] switch LibO layout and back delete user specific settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136421 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136433] Character Styles is misleading showing a font name (while it's actually inherited)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136433 Kevin Suo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suokunl...@126.com Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Kevin Suo --- I notice this bug everyday. It semns never worked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136140] Sidebar: Fontwork sidebar is missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136140 --- Comment #9 from Sascha Z --- @Telesto: there are many questions and also suggestions in your post. But, the fact we decided yesterday against the implementation of a Fontwork sidebar was simply done by orientation on the UX guideline, as you can find under: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Guidelines Combined with the UX principles https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Principles do the lead our common way. I would like to suggest changes on the sidebar behaviour and add additional principles for my suggestions. But this would mean discussions of the whole UX team. So I rather keep it up for now and subordinate myself to those principles as they are. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 133886] Libreoffice Calc Subtotals check all columns at once
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133886 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Blocks||108019 Keywords||needsUXEval --- Comment #3 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> --- Let's ask the UX-team. In general +1 from me Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108019 [Bug 108019] [META] Calc UX bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136729] Insert rows allows only 99 new rows, but the input doesn't message that clearly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136729 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Caolán McNamara --- I'll call this resolved as I think that's as much as we can do here -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136729] Insert rows allows only 99 new rows, but the input doesn't message that clearly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136729 --- Comment #6 from Commit Notification --- Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/429d4e1c70c71e898de293647c7623303ffe960b tdf#136729 raise insert row/col from 99 to 200 It will be available in 7.1.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136729] Insert rows allows only 99 new rows, but the input doesn't message that clearly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136729 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.1.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136729] Insert rows allows only 99 new rows, but the input doesn't message that clearly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136729 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #5 from Telesto --- (In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #4) > [1] Though it would be neat if gtk did something like change the border > color from the default blue to red if the current entered text would result > in a number out of range. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136812] Adding more than 1 paragraph style to chapter numbering level
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136812 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel --- The feature request is valid. But I think we should not start a new discussion. Set duplicate to bug 62032. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 62032 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136140] Sidebar: Fontwork sidebar is missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136140 --- Comment #8 from Telesto --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) > We discussed the topic in the design meeting and agreed to not have fontwork > in the sidebar. It's just to rarely used and well suited for a dialog. Not objecting against the decisions here.. but still I would love some kind guide(line) book for the fundamentals of LibreOffice UX design. This helps to have a frame work for communication, to understand UX decisions, make arguments and might result in better discussions. And would make it succession proof too. Else there is a risk of total different approach if people move on etc. Some area's of interest: Idea behind tabbed/toolbars etc. Is they sidebar seen an supplement or as an replacement? Matters for topics like Fontwork in sidebar Also something about accessibility matters. Not used to look at software from this perspective. So some guidance would be helpful. (Reset button Paragraph styles needed?) Some descriptions of Benjamin and Eve users. There are plenty of interpretations possible. Which makes communicating about user, user needs rather hard. Someone is talking about Benjamins in company setting others about Benjamin in home setting Some guidelines about core features functionality and 'extras. Markdown isn't essential core feature (sorry keep bringing this up). Which means (disabled by default, IMHO). Or it might be even an extension. Same story with tabbed bars variants. So two questions: which parts get into LibreOffice itself, which part should be extensions. And If it should be embedded with LibreOffice (default: on/off). And if something gets managed as extension how do you embedded it into dialogs and such. Which also affects QA(more embedded settings, more stuff never gets tested; will be broken (like Autocorrect -> Options -> Apply Style setting; currently crashing; not enabled by default etc.. so not to often noticed). However this is also matter of API etc.. can stuff be done with extensions.. And how do you embedded those 'advanced' features nicely. --- For the record: I don't expect a full blown documentation guideline from the start. But seems practical to have a working in progress draft with some kind UX guidelines for LibreOffice. I assume Linux distro's have something similar (copy cat) This helps with making UX-decisions and communicating those. I would even consider dumping every topic ever managed into it. As discussions of the past explaining the current state of the GUI. It's pretty hard to accessible (split across plenty of open (and closed bugs). And in mailing list. There is likely much being said in 10 years LibreOffice (and probably in the time before) It's always practical to know why Highlighting got a different tab and the position it currently has (I personally tend to drop it into the font effects). The major objection for me is the size of the dialog (it doesn't fit to well). Note: I could think of subtabs, like highlighting tab has (non/color). So one Font tab; with 3 area's (Font, Font effects & Highlighting). Objections might be accessibility, in the sense of extra click. Or the size of the dialog GUI guidelines should also list number clicks, depth of the setting (Character Style is really hard to manage) without Inspector deck or Character style deck open). And if sidebar is being intended as replacement this become even harder.. And if Sidebar is intended as addition (it's also problematic; small screens can't use the sidebar; style deck nor Inspector deck) [Can't remember arguing about that]. So a checklist would also be nice, to having a list of topics to take in consideration :-) Might matter too in case of the whole sidebar resize individually issue; or the add an configuration wizard on first launch (tabbed/toolbar) matter. If there are UX-guidelines to minimize the usage of dialog to a minimum; it's already an argument (to object). Or minimum requirements for like accessibility matters. And also rules about 'naming of tools'. No-fill/no-fill. Or To Page anchoring. Or Reset/Standard matter. And maybe even procedure of 'experiments'. I still think LibO fresh should be used to do some UX experiments once in a while.. With risk of backfiring (and last resort reverting). Sometimes arguing hard without data. A says people get confused, bad idea. B says dramatic view, everything will be all right. We end up in a status quo; a stand still. Might be liked by some, but dislike by others. Do we really have to wait until someone else invented it? Or being tremendously conservative. It's a project (not a product). (Social/UX) experiments are allowed. [Except we are seeing LibreOffice as a product.. TDF, what's the vision on this topic?] Yes, might be sometimes work for nothing (implemented, backfired, revert) but always adds something anyhow. Or knowledge or a different design.. However I assume some people don't like 'experiments' with fresh. While
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 131768] Risk of unintended document sharing if the inserting PDF image feature is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131768 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > Accepted but after adding more than one page you may want to scroll. You > don't want to split an animated image into single frames. Nor have all pages > separated in case of PDFs. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114234 *** Unlikely, the ipdf (pdfium based) 'Insert as image' filter will only render 1 page, the 1st as currently or as selected with work on bug 114234; the privacy issue here is that the full PDF remains in the ODF archive for high resolution printing. Needed tweak is to delete all but the selected page from the PDF held in ODF while inserting the image. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 131768] Risk of unintended document sharing if the inserting PDF image feature is used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131768 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #5) > For me as for Timur, this is a duplicate of Bug 114234 - Dialog for the > inserting/opening of images/pdfs with multiple pages. > > When people are aware that they import more than one page and they can > choose which page(s) they can insert, then this bug is solved too. I don't > see the difference here or the need to complicate the UI or workflow > unnecessarily? Accepted but after adding more than one page you may want to scroll. You don't want to split an animated image into single frames. Nor have all pages separated in case of PDFs. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114234 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136134] Easy list of recently used styles for quick applying
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136134 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #5) > Another way of making styles better usable for some users like favorite > styles as in bug 93111. Not a fan of more filter but it's an acceptable (and not too difficult to implement) solution. So let's take this as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93111 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 116497] UI: New styles can't be added using the 'styles action' menu in the styles sidebar for frame, list and table styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116497 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze --- Let's do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136529] TABLE PROPERTIES: Adding borders to a table cell changes that cell's row height, if "Fit to Size" is enabled for row height
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136529 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Joao Carvalho from comment #8) > Bingo. This solved it for me. I would rather not touch the auto padding. Haven't seen any complaint in the past, and it might feel as a regression for many users. So better resolve as NAB. (In reply to Joao Carvalho from comment #9) > When I add a border and then look at the table properties, it incorrectly > says padding is still set 0,00cm... Padding changes to 0.5cm if you either click one of the presets or any user-defined borders. Pretty clear to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 128135] UI GTK3: dialog Pivot Table Layout / properties is too high: section Source and Destination cannot be fully used
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128135 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||135818 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135818 [Bug 135818] pivot table layout: hidden options not expanded when dialog maximized -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136837] Fileopen and filesave to DOCX: Table Title not read and saved as Alt Text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136837 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136837] Fileopen and filesave to DOCX: Table Title not read and saved as Alt Text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136837 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Keywords||accessibility, filter:docx Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #2 from Timur --- Alt Text is accessibility issue. If we don't read or save to DOCX that's data loss. I thought of 2 possibilities: 1. change UI for table Options to add field for table Alt Text, like in Image - Options or Chart - Options OR 2. simply open DOCX table Alt Text as table Title and save ODT table Title as Alt Text, which is more simple but not consistent approach. Can't say for ODF, couudn't find in standard, but it must be there, like for images or chart. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136837] Fileopen and filesave to DOCX: Table Title not read and saved as Alt Text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136837 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Please explain what you expect. Guess a field for the alternative text that might be send to the caption right now. Is there room in the ODF format, what purpose has this field (beyond HTML editing), why not just ignore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136414] Page Style dialog, does apply do what it supposed to do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136414 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Right clicking an entry in the tree does not activate it. It's the same question for all kind of styles, no need to file several requests. And the suggested solution is to have the active style still highlighted even when another is selected for editing. => DUP *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94427 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136837] Fileopen and filesave to DOCX: Table Title not read and saved as Alt Text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136837 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136812] Adding more than 1 paragraph style to chapter numbering level
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136812 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #3) > How to do this, is a question for the mailing list. Let's resolve the ticket then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136165] Export transparent background optionally (otherwise use canvas background)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136165 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | Summary|Transparent background when |Export transparent |exporting a page with image |background optionally |to PNG |(otherwise use canvas ||background) Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. Here are the minutes: + reason for the confusion is likely the fact that background color is saved when the full document is exported + don't see Draw as equivalent to Inkscape or the like, -1 for the checkerboard background (Heiko) + also it's not clear how to implement without affecting the document + but we already have provided checkerboard for the SB Gallery + would be nice to have (Stuart) + Export option "[ ] Save Background as visible" (Csongor, Stuart) + rather have a new section *Background* with "[x] Save Transparency" Let's implement this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136075] Sidebar: Move List content back to the Paragraph section in Draw/Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136075 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting and concluded to resolve as wontfix. Lists are very special in Impress and have a much higher importance. Plus, in Writer the list is an attribute of the paragraph style but not in Impress. Moving back would mean to loose the option to bring up the list dialog per click at the upper right icon in the content panel (besides it makes not much sense). So rather moving in we think the list option should be moved out in Writer. However, that makes currently also not much sense. Separating the list style from the paragraph style is technically wrong but has the charm of easier self-evidence and intelligibility. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136140] Sidebar: Fontwork sidebar is missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136140 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting and agreed to not have fontwork in the sidebar. It's just to rarely used and well suited for a dialog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136071] UI Calc Format – Spacing submenu contains unusable, greyed out items
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136071 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|bibisected, bisected, |difficultyBeginner, |needsUXEval, regression |easyHack, skillDesign, ||topicUI --- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. And since spacing is so special for Calc the recommendation is to remove it completely. All functions are available via context menu, sidebar, or the paragraph properties dialog. This also applies to indentation. sc/uiconfig/scalc/menubar/menubar.xml -> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 136071] UI Calc Format – Spacing submenu contains unusable, greyed out items
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136071 --- Comment #5 from Buovjaga --- Please remember to update Help as I just recently created it for Format - Spacing across the suite: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/99383 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
