[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148479] Support category indicators

2022-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148479

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148479] Support category indicators

2022-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148479

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148513] Poor nomenclature for Manual Break

2022-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148513

--- Comment #20 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #19)
> Keep localization in mind.
Proposal in comment 14 seems translation-friendly in terms of understanding
(i.e., familiar nouns and adjectives, simple prepositions, no special
grammatical demands).

> And the UI scales according to the largest content.
The Spanish translation might be pretty long.

In that connectionto gain some more room in the "to" field ...

Could the Vertical and Horizontal control widths be reduced?
At present, there is a least a cm of white space in the drop down menu.   

Also the "by" field could probably be reduced a little.

And there is already bug 148512 to address the "to" field.

(and ftr, such UI adjustments are beyond my possibilities. Presumably it is
preferred that these changes are achieved before July string freeze.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148479] Support category indicators

2022-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148479

--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> Likely not possible without changing the ODF spec.

Oh, yes, certainly. I should have mentioned that. Definitely asking for this to
be directly representable in ODF files and part of the spec.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148513] Poor nomenclature for Manual Break

2022-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148513

--- Comment #19 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #18)
> a bit long and not fully obvious from reading alone...

Not a blocker for your proposal, just to note: Keep localization in mind. And
the UI scales according to the largest content.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.