[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 |
   |813 |
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 Blocks|85184   |

--- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
With the existing two workarounds (Recent palette, and the copy-paste of colour
code), I see this as a clear duplicate of bug 93813. See also bug 130967, which
is already marked as duplicate
It might be added to the widgets as part of a fix, and if not, it would be a
follow-up enhancement request.
Let's consolidate.
Thank you!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93813 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget
bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #12 from Jim Raykowski  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
> How about defaulting to off?
+1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
   ||813
 Blocks||85184

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote  ---
In effect we already have this, just not in the "eyedropper" motif--and see
also bug 93813 to rework the SD color replacment.

That is, the 'Background Color' TB button opens the common color picker
displaying the active palette (usually 'Standard'). And across the bottom is a
swatch bar with the 12 most 'Recent' colors across the UI (so not just current
Calc session).

What is not obvious, is that for any cell on the sheet selected, launching the
'Background Color' picker's button link to the 'Custom color...' dialog will
show the bg color of the cell.

Likewise for the 'Font Color' picker's link to 'Custom color...' where dialog
will show the fg color for font in the cell.

Between the two, it is trivial to match colors for those occasions when the 12
swatch recent bar is insufficient, a textual copy/paste of the RGB. Not quite
dropper style, and could be enhanced to pass RGBA values back to the Recent
swatch bar for bg fill or fg text.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget
bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159950] Offer to download missing fonts from relevant online sources (dynamically, after installation)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Offer to download & install |Offer to download missing
   |missing fonts from online   |fonts from relevant online
   |sources |sources (dynamically, after
   ||installation)

--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8)
> Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license.

Agreed, but this bug doesn't suggest hosting fonts. Rather, it's about allowing
the download of fonts from known, stable, 3rd-party sources.

> Nor can
> we police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. 

Also agreed, but I don't believe I suggested we do that.

> But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font
> bundling.

Again - this bug is not about bundling :-( I am not suggesting we bundle more
stuff. Let me try to clarify this in the phrasing of the title.

In fact, if anything, this may allow for a reduction in the number of bundled
fonts.

> I've
> suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font
> License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice.

A fine suggestion, which is mostly orthogonal to this bug. I mentioned Aptos as
an example of a font which users may like to have LibreOffice download when
they encounter it in a document - providing that this is possible license-wise
and availablility-wise, with a legit source. But if we can't do this for Aptos
- we can still do it for many other fonts.

> Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on
> premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install
> to user profile, is a needed feature.

Hmm... that would be useful as well.

So, LO as bundled could have several publicly-accessible font download sources,
which could be searched when an unavailable font is encountered; but this list
could be made user-extensible, with a URL of a font repository which an
organization might offer/configure (or an individual user if they have access
to one).

How does that sound?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote  ---
testing with

Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Oh crud! How'd I miss the persistent category tracking for all the categories
done for bug 145132 at 7.3 [1] all still set with true defaults as currently
refactored [2].

So the per content category context menu "tracking" toggle is toggled enabled
by default when inserting new Sections. And verified the attachment 193805
sample document 2 has it set, also that when I toggle it off, the Heading
category navigation behaves with no jump into the encompassing section.

Also verified that if toggled disabled, newly inserted sections observe the
persistent toggle disabled. 

In addition to the context menu toggle, the Navigator "SectionTracking" value
can be set via Expert Configuration, or manually edited in the LO
registrymodifications.xcu at:

false

Sorry for the noise Jim, *

=-ref-=
[1] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/122874
[2] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129981

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 144817 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159950] Offer to download & install missing fonts from online sources

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950

--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Nor can we
police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. 

But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font
bundling. "Free" or "Available" have to be kept at arms length. Why I've
suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font
License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice.

Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on
premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install to
user profile, is a needed feature.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160353] List images in order of document appearance in Calc Navigator

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|List images in order of |List images in order of
   |document appearance in  |document appearance in Calc
   |navigator   |Navigator
 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||rayk...@gmail.com,
   ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I'd call this an enhancement.
UX/Design, Jim, what do you think?

Relevant fixed bugs (all Writer):
Bug 146419
Bug 143569  
Bug 134960 
Bug 86395
Bug 52115
Bug 40427

Relevant patches from bug 134960 comment 27:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133101
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133342
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133350
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133359
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131448

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> The close naming is a source of confusion. How about "History" or
> "Navigation History"?

Eww, no. "Recency" would be most correct TB name, but a horrible burden for
l10n/i18n to localize.

So instead "Recent Positions" for TB name, keeping current button names "Back"
/ "Forward"? That would remove any Navigation vs. Navigator ambiguity.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 120719] tools -> options ability to backup and restore user options and customizations, reuse the profile export / restore from SafeModeDialog

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120719

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org

--- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #12)
> @Samuel, any reason the Backup and Restore from SafeModeUI couldn't be
> reused against a profile saved outside the SafeMode dialog?
Essentially a question to developers (adding a button next to "Archive User
Profile" is simple). I wonder how to deal with renamed, removed, added
attributes. Probably to ignore it.

Personally I'd prefer Justin's solution, if enhanced with save-to and load-from
functions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160032] MASTER Document -- updating linked documents automatically: different setting for master documents (on opening)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160032

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org,
   ||mentoring@documentfoundatio
   ||n.org
   Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyInteresting,
   ||easyHack, skillCpp, topicUI
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze  ---
LinkManager::UpdateAllLinks() shows the question with STR_QUERY_UPDATE_LINKS.
The function is used in various scenarios across all modules and we must not
disable it globally. But there is a bAskUpdate option! And since the function
is used only a few times in sw/, I suggest to find the right code pointer per
debugger.

Not sure if the weld::MessageDialog can have a checkbox, might require some UI
based dialog. The checkbox would be hidden unless it's a master document, and
the dialog in this condition if the checkbox was checked before (or rather
unchecked with "[x] Show this message").

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160255] Named Ranges Should Be Able to be Used in Conditional Formatting Dialog Box

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160255

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org
 Blocks||109178, 87351
   Keywords|needsUXEval |needsDevAdvice

--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Would be nice but requires cross-platform and -application support. In other
words it needs to be defined in the file format.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87351
[Bug 87351] [META] Conditional formatting bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109178
[Bug 109178] [META] Named Cell Ranges and Formula Expressions bugs and
enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze  ---
The close naming is a source of confusion. How about "History" or "Navigation
History"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Jim Raykowski from comment #8)
> I didn't see that it had been tried to turn off section tracking. To do
> this, right-click on 'Sections' or an entry under Sections then uncheck
> 'Section Tracking'.
How about defaulting to off?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.