[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #8 from Jim Raykowski --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #7) +1 Tracks exactly with what I was thinking all the way down to the "Position History" length compared to the "Wrong table formula" length. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Rename "Navigation" toolbar |Rename "Navigation" toolbar |to clarify its role, avoid |to clarify its role, avoid |confusion, and relate to|confusion, and relate to |"Recency" |"Navigate by - Recency" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Sounds like "Position History" is the top contender - which makes me think: do we also want to make the Navigate By dropdown's text consistent with it, by replacing "Recency" with "Position History"? "Navigate by - position history" works well. I think it would make sense and clarify the role. "Recency" makes it sound like "how recently the object was created". In that list, it's the only element out of 21 that is about about "things that don't exist anymore". All other elements are about "what currently exists in the document" (or session, for Reminders). We better make that extra clear with an appropriate, consistent label. "Position History" (16 chars) wouldn't be too long for that Navigate By list - "Wrong table formula" is already longer (20 chars). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160629] Bullets and Numbering dialog in Writer does not say it's about an implicit list style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160629 --- Comment #4 from Olivier Hallot --- Looking from the other side, cleaning implicit list is not possible with Ctrl+M, and is one of the most exhausting task we have in editing the Guides. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160629] Bullets and Numbering dialog in Writer does not say it's about an implicit list style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160629 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@nouenoff.nl --- Comment #3 from Cor Nouws --- lovely topic, Gábor. Snake pit as well ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160242] Enhancement: Make possible 2 or more impress in fullscreen each on a dedicated monitor AND each seekable indipendently with user-defined hotkeys per each file.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160242 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@nouenoff.nl --- Comment #4 from Cor Nouws --- Looks a very reasonable request to put in work with a second laptop ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #6 from Jim Raykowski --- +1 for "Position History" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 158932] Icons for promote / demote outline level should be improved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158932 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kain...@gmail.com, ||riz...@libreoffice.org, ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org Blocks||106228, 103030 OS|All |Windows (All) --- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote --- An iconography issue, best left to the icon theme designers. Currently only Rizal's "Karasa Jaga" icon theme uses a stylized outline for both demote/promote outline and move up/down of headings. Our other icon themes use single triangle/arrow pointers, with just the "Colibre" icon theme using a double pointer motif by default on Windows. Personally I have no issue with the "Colibre" theme on Windows, and not clear it is necessary to shift all artwork for the button icons to something other than direction pointers. -1 from me. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030 [Bug 103030] [META] Navigator sidebar deck and floating window (also "Target in Document") https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 [Bug 106228] [META] Icon theme issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 158932] Icons for promote / demote outline level should be improved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158932 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval Summary|move heading up -- promote |Icons for promote / demote |/ denote outline level |outline level should be |(NAVIGATOR) |improved CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #4) > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3) > > So instead "Recent Positions" for TB name > Or "Position History" (which combine recent proposals; also "History" is > known from webbrowsers, with the idea of keeping a chronological order) OK "Position History", +1 Should be translatable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #4 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3) > So instead "Recent Positions" for TB name Or "Position History" (which combine recent proposals; also "History" is known from webbrowsers, with the idea of keeping a chronological order) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160353] List images in order of document appearance in Calc Navigator
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353 --- Comment #3 from Telesto --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > To sum up, a) there is no unique order in Calc True > b) sorting needs to be optional. Well a list has a top down order order by definition. So images listed in the navigator are sorted anyhow. So it's not clear what you want to convey by optional. I don't necessary intend to insert some sort filter with various options. More the adjust the default logic to make it more predictable. In similar fashion as in Writer. Arranging images by insertion time a large spreadsheet with lots of images (>50) simply random. Same as image creation time. Or sorting by filename. You have filename if insert with Insert -> Image, in case of copy paste you get something like: image27. I don't expect people to be really conscious about image file names in general. Look the sample document. Row by row seems to more sensible. So first image A1, next image in B1, 2C..followed by row 2, column A; A2; B2; C2. This makes the arrangement at least predictable. This use-full results for non-complex spreadsheets with where one column being filled with images (like example), which I think being a rather common use-case. The current order in unproductive in any case, IMHO. --- What might work is an alternative view option listing the images visible in the view port. This is useful if images being distributed across plenty of columns on the same row; however not sure of need for it. Seems a bit excessive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160353] List images in order of document appearance in Calc Navigator
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103030 --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze --- Sorting has been requested in * Bug 90244 - SIDEBAR: Enhancing Navigator in Draw * Bug 104255 - Allow alphabetical sorting of Navigator content (headings, bookmarks, etc.) (and probably other too) What sort order is the best depends on the scenario. In case of Calc it is even more difficult as you may have some vertical/horizontal arrangement in mind. But users may organize the content differently, or have a non-Western view on data. Some other scenarios require perhaps to sort by the image name, users become greedy and want us to sort by image size, etc. To sum up, a) there is no unique order in Calc, and b) sorting needs to be optional. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030 [Bug 103030] [META] Navigator sidebar deck and floating window (also "Target in Document") -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
