[Bug 160947] [RFE] New product to LibreOffice suite - Content file search tool
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160947 --- Comment #6 from Tex2002ans --- "Everything" is a program on Windows which has an extremely in-depth "search within all filetypes" functionality: - https://www.voidtools.com/ I use that to mass search HTML, TXT, RTF, DOCX, ODT, ... all in one shot. And, best of all, it's WAY faster than the default Windows Explorer search. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160920] Allow choosing the page style from the sheets tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160920 --- Comment #11 from ady --- (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #10) > > The positive in the status bar: the UI space is already used for Page Style > > info. This is a negative for the worksheet Tab, where a new non-essential > I would love to see a broadly accepted and clear definition of > 'non-essential' in the UI/software? By non-essential I mean that there are other ways to achieve the same goal. Having the possibility of selecting a different Page Style, either from the status bar of from the worksheet Tab could be convenient, but there are other ways to achieve it. For instance, in the worksheet Tab, the context menu includes "Move or Copy sheet", which I think it is more relevant in this menu than the suggested Page Style. After some time, we can read the opposite reasoning: "your request for this new UI artifact sounds useful, but that area of the UI already has many items". At some point, adding items is not as much welcome. Carefully considering which precise items are really a plus in a certain context menu eventually reduces the potential unwanted clutter. > > (but potentially useful) context menu item would be added. > > > > The negative in the status bar: the current info is relevant for the current > > worksheet only. When selecting multiple worksheets, perhaps with different > > Page Styles each, there is no indication of the Page Styles in use by the > > other selected worksheets. In such situation, allowing to select a different > > Page Style for the multiple-selection of worksheets would impact all the > > selected worksheets, and it would be easy for users to not notice the > > multiple change. > That is not different to what happens when applying a style in the Manage > Styles pane. > But honestly I think that users that work with multiple sheets selected, can > be considered experienced enough to.. Experienced users make mistakes too. By the time users realize the mistake, it might be too late to undo it. With the current situation, users can modify the Page Style itself from the status bar, but ATM it is not possible (from the status bar) to make the mistake of selecting a different Page Style to "unwanted" worksheets. Since the status bar can show the Page Style that corresponds to the current worksheet _only_ (while having multiple worksheets selected), the chance for this potential mistake increases. That is not to say that the suggested change is not worth it. I was just mentioning some UX details that might be relevant in order to choose whether the suggested context menu (or whichever other UI method) should rather be located on the status bar or on the worksheet Tab, and perhaps to have additional details in mind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160920] Allow choosing the page style from the sheets tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160920 --- Comment #10 from Cor Nouws --- (In reply to ady from comment #9) > If I may... If you insist .. ;) - but sure! > The positive in the status bar: the UI space is already used for Page Style > info. This is a negative for the worksheet Tab, where a new non-essential I would love to see a broadly accepted and clear definition of 'non-essential' in the UI/software? Me expects to get dozens - IOW: it's rather subjective. > (but potentially useful) context menu item would be added. > > The negative in the status bar: the current info is relevant for the current > worksheet only. When selecting multiple worksheets, perhaps with different > Page Styles each, there is no indication of the Page Styles in use by the > other selected worksheets. In such situation, allowing to select a different > Page Style for the multiple-selection of worksheets would impact all the > selected worksheets, and it would be easy for users to not notice the > multiple change. That is not different to what happens when applying a style in the Manage Styles pane. But honestly I think that users that work with multiple sheets selected, can be considered experienced enough to.. > Perhaps the display of the Page Style should change when selecting multiple > worksheets? For instance, use bold?, italics?, underline? add symbol? > Currently this distinction is not needed, even when selecting multiple > worksheets. Yes, maybe a bit opaque .. still people would need to learn/see the meaning. > If the Page Style is simultaneously changed for more than the > current/active/displayed worksheet, perhaps a confirmation dialog should pop > up? See before: it is standing practice - and a different subject, so pls open a separate bug report to discuss. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 153777] FLUID page number indication option: on / off
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153777 --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- *** Bug 158526 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 158526] page number display in the status bar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158526 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- Third attempt to revert this into "A-B of C" :-). Please consider more than two pages. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 153777 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 153777] FLUID page number indication option: on / off
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153777 --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze --- *** Bug 159921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 159921] number of pages indication: display format options (enhancement request)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159921 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 153777 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 146448] DOCX: A drawing object has a "Remove Textbox" which creates an empty frame (Captionbox/image frame is converted to Drawing object)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146448 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval |filter:docx --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze --- Undo/redo deletes the whole object, which could be expected considering that deleting the caption frame also removes the content. However, adding a caption to a default drawing object makes the caption frame a frame and not a drawing object itself. I believe this is a bug in the import filter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160950] Warn before performing a destructive/lossy edit of OLE object
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160950 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Properties > Options > Protect > Contents - does not disable/hide the Edit function and allows to change the content => bug. Other than that I could imagine a solution per frame/section that is made read-only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160947] [RFE] New product to LibreOffice suite - Content file search tool
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160947 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze --- pdfgrep does its job pretty well, and apparently there are also tools for ODF. And ultimately it's up to the OS/DE to search files for content. => WF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160947] [RFE] New product to LibreOffice suite - Content file search tool
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160947 --- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote --- "Solutions" thus far, including the LO bundled native "Windows Explorer Extension" or the LOOOK extension, only parse ODF and OOXML source documents for full-text string contents. This RFE for "non-indexed" search within the LO UI is much broader filter request and seems out of scope to project--even as an Extension -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160947] [RFE] New product to LibreOffice suite - Content file search tool
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160947 --- Comment #3 from Anton Shevtsov --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2) > I think such tool need not be a core tool, but could be provided as > extension or as separate tool. Perhaps contact Mechtilde Stehmann. She > provides Loook, which is similar to such tool. > https://mechtilde.de/Loook/index.html Loook for odt only. No pdf, no rtf, no htm... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160955] When selecting an alternative link target for an OLE object, button says "Insert"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160955 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- Edit > External Links... has a Modify button. (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0) > Easy hack? Don't spot the string in a quick glance in ChangeSourceClickHdl at cui/source/dialogs/linkdlg.cxx. Maybe mxFileDlg->setTitle( SfxResId( STR_SFX_EXPLORERFILE_INSERT ) ); in sfx2/source/dialog/filedlghelper.cxx but this affects all dialogs then. Could be solved by introducing another flag for FileDialogFlags but using this flag becomes a bit tricky. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160954] Can't change OLE Object link target from context menu and properties dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160954 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||3536 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160949] When editing an OLE object but not taking any action - undo edit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160949 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|needsUXEval |needsDevEval CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- How would you know what happend in the other module or even external application? Or do we open only in LibreOffice. Anyway, if nothing happens it would be nice to see it in the undo stack as well. But low priority. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160947] [RFE] New product to LibreOffice suite - Content file search tool
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160947 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de --- Comment #2 from Regina Henschel --- I think such tool need not be a core tool, but could be provided as extension or as separate tool. Perhaps contact Mechtilde Stehmann. She provides Loook, which is similar to such tool. https://mechtilde.de/Loook/index.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160947] [RFE] New product to LibreOffice suite - Content file search tool
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160947 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org Summary|[FR] New product to |[RFE] New product to |LibreOffice suite - Content |LibreOffice suite - Content |file search tool|file search tool Keywords||needsUXEval --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote --- Seems kind of non-performant, would require threaded parsing of document content from the various zip archive and binary files. Also, this feature would require integration with os/DE file manager and native implementation per os/DE. Seems a return to efforts of the 'Use LibreOffice Dialogs' internal file manager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160954] Can't change OLE Object link target from context menu and properties dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160954 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133536 *** Heiko, that bug is about a Calc spreadsheet with links within it, embedded into a Writer document. This bug is about any OLE object; and it's not about the inability to update, but the convenience/accessibility of the UI for updating. So, not a dupe. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160955] When selecting an alternative link target for an OLE object, button says "Insert"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160955 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Where? I have Edit (opens the object), Properties, Delete, and Rename. Have a look at the screenshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160955] When selecting an alternative link target for an OLE object, button says "Insert"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160955 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 193988 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193988=edit Screenshot of the "Edit Links" dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160954] Can't change OLE Object link target from context menu and properties dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160954 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133536 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160955] When selecting an alternative link target for an OLE object, button says "Insert"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160955 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0) > 5. Press "Modify" Where? I have Edit (opens the object), Properties, Delete, and Rename. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160227] Add timer/clock to single-screen presentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160227 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|145878 |103610 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #6) > "Reherse Timings"... could be added to Slide Show Properties... > > I think you got more resistance to the idea because you suggested to make it > an object to put on the slides. Somehow it needs to be shown anyway, and I don't think you can add this to the slide show. But the use case makes sense and we can keep it. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 [Bug 103610] [META] Slide show (presentation mode) bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145878 [Bug 145878] [META] Enhancements that could be realized per macro -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160227] Add timer/clock to single-screen presentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160227 j22...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #8 from j22...@gmail.com --- Hi, thanks everyone for considering this. Yes, I think what Tomaz Vajngerl suggests is something useful. Heiko Tietze, one possible use of this is when you want the speaker and the audience to see how much the talk is taking. This would encourage people to stick to the time limit in a conference for example (without the need of external clocks). I re-open this for further consideration. Thanks for allowing the possibility of dogin so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160955] When selecting an alternative link target for an OLE object, button says "Insert"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160955 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsDevEval, needsUXEval See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7881 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Blocks||107810, 112581 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107810 [Bug 107810] [META] OLE/Embedded object bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112581 [Bug 112581] [META] Linked (non-embedded) external files bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160954] Can't change OLE Object link target from context menu and properties dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160954 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7881 Keywords||needsUXEval Blocks||107810 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107810 [Bug 107810] [META] OLE/Embedded object bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160908] "Edit cell background highlight"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160908 --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Printf Debugging from comment #2) > I made some changes to match what is asked by the OP in tdf#63374. Should I > accommodate these label related changes in that patch? If you were a tailor you could hit seven at one blow :-). Just add both tickets in the summary like "Resolves tdf#123 and tdf#456: Lorem ipsum". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160657] Improve how Writer Navigator Headings are displayed when alphabetically sorted
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160657 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze --- Follow-up in bug 160951 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160949] When editing an OLE object but not taking any action - undo edit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160949 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160950] Warn before performing a destructive/lossy edit of OLE object
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160950 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107810 Keywords||needsUXEval CC||eyalr...@gmx.com, ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 ||0949 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107810 [Bug 107810] [META] OLE/Embedded object bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
