[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-03-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

--- Comment #14 from Cor Nouws  ---
(In reply to Bob Harvey from comment #6)
> Woah, just a minute.
> 
> That's not "invalid".  That's a hidden solution.  Where in the user
> interface is that exposed? where in the help pages does it tell you to do
> that if you can't drag the handles?  How the blue blistering blazes is
> someone supposed to guess they can do that?
Basically one needs an expert at the desk to help with any question ;)

(In reply to Bob Harvey from comment #10)
> I just expect the drag handles to work if the cursor knows they are there
> and changes shape to suggest they should.  That's all I expect.
Changing the handles is further dragging is blocked, looks a nice improvement
to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-03-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|7.6.4.1 release |Inherited From OOo
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
 OS|Windows (All)   |All

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

--- Comment #13 from Bdac  ---
Maybe, the 3rd solution is the better oneĀ : don't enable autosize by default to
make user aware of it. Give more freedom and flexibility...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-03-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lmiro...@yandex.ru

--- Comment #12 from Buovjaga  ---
*** Bug 159728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsDevAdvice

--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to m_a_riosv from comment #4)
> on Position & Size tab, disable 'Autosize option'

(In reply to Bob Harvey from comment #6)
> What about making it a bit more obvious what the problem is?

STR:
* on a new document, insert a frame which is should be not too wide
* add some text like lorem+f3
=> frame is sized to the max page height

Possible solutions:
a) accept as common interaction
b) consider as bug since SE/NW etc. resize does not shrink the frame
c) don't enable autosize by default to make user aware of it
d) block resizing on the autosized dimension (not sure that can be done)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

Bob Harvey  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

--- Comment #10 from Bob Harvey  ---
I just expect the drag handles to work if the cursor knows they are there and
changes shape to suggest they should.  That's all I expect.

And if some weird interaction with the footer means they can't, then the drag
handles should not be displayed in the first place.  (or perhaps in red to
denote they don't work???)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Essentially you expect the frame to behave like a scrolled window - if the
content exceeds the size a scrollbar appear. I disagree with this idea. While
shrinking the height you get feedback but it's just not accepted below the
content height. Very common interaction, IMO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

--- Comment #8 from Bob Harvey  ---
(In reply to Bogaboga Man from comment #7)
> I see the issue. What needs to happen IMO, is to enable inserted object
> manipulation by default no matter what the user may have as LO settings for
> such an insertion. This way, the immediate urge to "put things right" is
> possible.
> 
> My trial with manipulation via its properties especially `wrap` yielded some
> headway. I would also add the following as a feature request:
> 
> * Change the frame window title from `Frame` to `Frame properties`

It isn't, of course, just an issue with frames...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159543] Cannot resize graphical objects that overlap header/footer

2024-02-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.