[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 145031] UI: Add shape name in the list, which list the animations
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145031 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Telesto from comment #2) > If objects would have fixed internal name: Shape 1:Shape 2 this might help > orientate. But it does (except text boxes), in your example "Shape 1: Hello". I don't see a better solution neither a problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 145031] UI: Add shape name in the list, which list the animations
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145031 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #3 from Telesto --- Putting back to UNCONFIRMED. I would like some additional input regarding comment 0/ comment 2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 145031] UI: Add shape name in the list, which list the animations
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145031 --- Comment #2 from Telesto --- Created attachment 175659 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175659=edit Example file 1. Open the attached file 2. Sidebar -> Animation tab 3. Start removing names from Object Try to untangle all of the animations :-) Yes, this being kind of artificial. If objects would have fixed internal name: Shape 1:Shape 2 this might help orientate. (followed by the Name given in document) Advantage: You can simply spot if a single shape has multiple animations (all are called Shape 1 or whatever) You don't lose track anymore. Say you idenify an objet by ABC. If you replace it with DEF you lose you're orientation star. Which makes you lose oversight what is what? It would be more consistent/coherent with navigator [but I admit, the navigator doesn't does make it confusing here too] The auto-frames can't have self-defined names at all? Should clicking on an object which has animations being marked somehow (so you can identify which animations belong to an object?). No highlighting isn't possible (same object can have multiple animations). But maybe mark those with a * or whatever? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 145031] UI: Add shape name in the list, which list the animations
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145031 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62 ||851 Blocks||103437 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||rayk...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- If your shape has a name and text, eg. name "Foo" text "Hello World", it will be shown as "Shape 'Foo': Hello World". In case of text frames it's the content being shown like "Text Frame 'Lorem ip...': Lorem ipsum dolor est" (The entire text is added after the colon. We should abbreviate here as well.) It's not an issue for the animation deck but with empty names. We had this discussion recently regarding the Navigator. It shows now "Shape 1" when the name is empty but I don't remember why we don't set the name itself to "Shape 1". See also bug 62851. But that's a different story and since there is no issue with the animations deck I resolve the ticket as WF. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103437 [Bug 103437] [META] Custom animation deck/tab of the sidebar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 145031] UI: Add shape name in the list, which list the animations
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145031 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
