[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords|needsUXEval |

--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Without looking into the code we probably have the choice between pest and
cholera. Either we use a reasonable distance for ordered lists (if <10 items),
I suggest 1.20cm, and a somewhat large value for unordered lists or accept the
missing space between separator and text. But maybe the defaults can be defined
independently, in which case I'd keep 0.6cm for  unordered lists.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

--- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> So I suggest to resolve this ticket as WF and adjust the default width to
> some larger value that makes sense for the default template. 

You mean, a larger size for the bulleted case as well? Then you'll have too
much space with bullets.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze  ---
So I suggest to resolve this ticket as WF and adjust the default width to some
larger value that makes sense for the default template. IIRC there was another
ticket...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> > Gülşah, Mike: Writer adds a tab (optionally but by default) after the
> > number, which is not available in Impress. I wonder if this is a fall-out
> > from the dialog redesign or a missing attribute.
> 
> Not available, or just not added?

Lists in Impress use the "old" list structure with width of the numbering area,
whereas the lists available in the UI in Writer use the "new" list structure.
It has the attribute text:list-level-position-and-space-mode="label-alignment"
(20.431, part 3, ODF 1.3). The rendering engine in Impress is not able to use
the "new" list structure.

So 'followed by tab' or 'followed by blank' is not available for lists in
Impress.

https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#property-text_list-level-position-and-space-mode

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Gülşah, Mike: Writer adds a tab (optionally but by default) after the
> number, which is not available in Impress. I wonder if this is a fall-out
> from the dialog redesign or a missing attribute.

Not available, or just not added?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||gulsah.k...@collabora.com,
   ||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Gülşah, Mike: Writer adds a tab (optionally but by default) after the number,
which is not available in Impress. I wonder if this is a fall-out from the
dialog redesign or a missing attribute.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151306] Default width for numbering is insufficient

2022-10-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151306

Rafael Lima  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com
   Keywords||needsUXEval
   Severity|minor   |enhancement

--- Comment #1 from Rafael Lima  ---
I agree that the default spacing between the number and the text is too narrow.

You can fix it manually by going to Bullets and Numbering and increasing the
"Width" value.

Anyways, I think we could have better defaults for this function.

I don't see it as a bug (nothing is broken), but rather as an enhancement. So
let's hear some input from the UX team.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.