[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 152851] MathML import should work even when no xmlns attribute is present

2023-01-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152851

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98
   ||827
 Blocks||118765
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118765
[Bug 118765] [META] MathML bugs
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 152851] MathML import should work even when no xmlns attribute is present

2023-01-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152851

--- Comment #4 from Regina Henschel  ---
I think, it is a valid enhancement request. It might be duplicate to bug 98827,
at least strong related. From a user point of view such feature is important as
it would allow to import  fragments. I would restrict the request to
texts, which have  root element and start with . The result might
not be as expected because LibreOffice's MathML support is at version 2.0. But
getting something the user then can edit is better than getting nothing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 152851] MathML import should work even when no xmlns attribute is present

2023-01-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152851

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> The RELAX NG schema, and I believe we are talking about this, has been
> introduced a while ago and we should support it. What do you think, Regina?

Looks to me that RELAX NG still requires a DTD of the xmlns: tag for the
content.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 152851] MathML import should work even when no xmlns attribute is present

2023-01-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152851

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement

--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze  ---
The RELAX NG schema, and I believe we are talking about this, has been
introduced a while ago and we should support it. What do you think, Regina?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 152851] MathML import should work even when no xmlns attribute is present

2023-01-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152851

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||rb.hensc...@t-online.de,
   ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
Summary|Mathml import should work   |MathML import should work
   |even when no xmlns  |even when no xmlns
   |attribute is present|attribute is present
   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Blocks||39750

--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote  ---
I don't think this would be appropriate. The XML Namespace (xmlns:) is
significant to sm parsing as it declares the syntax of the content, and then
for correctly holding its source in the resulting ODF archive.   

For example if we eventually were to extend the import filter parsing to
include TeX / LaTeX (bug 96208), or maybe AsciiMath markups--the import parsers
have to be able to identify the source formatting.

The prescribed xmlns: for MathML flags this cleanly for clipboard import of
MathML, it is needed to validate content.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39750
[Bug 39750] [META] General Math formula editor improvements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.