[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 --- Comment #16 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 --- Comment #15 from tor...@yahoo.com --- OK, case for this improvement is not strong. Let's work on serious bugs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #14 from Eyal Rozenberg --- A field is just a piece of content which, instead of being specified explicitly, is specified implicitly/programmatically. Once rendered - there's nothing special about it. So, other than field shading, I fail to see why field-generated content should be styled in any way. > Well, I often read the direct formatting was bad practice. Yes, but - you should not format field-generate content at all - neither with with DF nor with a style. However - it seems from your example that you may be filling a sort of a form. Or maybe creating a form to be filled by others. If that is the case, please read about Form Controls: https://help.libreoffice.org/6.2/en-US/text/shared/02/0117.html?DbPAR=SHARED and consider adding things like textbox controls to your document. > field would have the same consistent look within the document (main text, > header, …), and between documents. That should not happen. Or... perhaps what you really want to distinguish field-generated content differently than using the gray field shading? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 --- Comment #13 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 --- Comment #12 from tor...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11) > (In reply to TorrAB from comment #0) > > Expected Results: > > A field should have its own, pre-defined, character style > > What is your use case that makes such an enhancement necessary? I mean > applying the CS after inserting a field sounds okay to me. Well, I often read the direct formatting was bad practice. With the same predefined character style, a field would have the same consistent look within the document (main text, header, …), and between documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to TorrAB from comment #0) > Expected Results: > A field should have its own, pre-defined, character style What is your use case that makes such an enhancement necessary? I mean applying the CS after inserting a field sounds okay to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 153537] FIELD DIALOG: Add possibility to assign character style to the field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153537 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||114039 Summary|A field should have its own |FIELD DIALOG: Add |character style |possibility to assign ||character style to the ||field Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #10 from Dieter --- (In reply to TorrAB from comment #9) > **No. I found default_paragraph_font and No_Character_Style, but the host > paragraph character style is usually different. Sorry, you're right. "No Character Style" is equal to character setting from paragraph style. So request is clear. Let's ask design team Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114039 [Bug 114039] [META] Fields dialog bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
