[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 33749] Inconsistencies in Help pages on Cell Merging and Splitting (unmerging) in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33749 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyBeginner, ||easyHack, skillDesign, ||topicUI CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org, ||mentoring@documentfoundatio ||n.org --- Comment #26 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #25) > (In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #24) > > ... in Writer the terminology is correct: "Split Cells". ... In Calc it > > is not possible to Split a cell. > > True, so the only argument is consistency and burden for l10n. No further opinion, leaving it for the potential volunteer. It's the label for .uno:SplitCell in CalcCommands.xcu and STR_UNDO_REMERGE (sic!) in sc/inc/globstr.hrc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 33749] Inconsistencies in Help pages on Cell Merging and Splitting (unmerging) in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33749 --- Comment #25 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #24) > ... in Writer the terminology is correct: "Split Cells". ... In Calc it > is not possible to Split a cell. True, so the only argument is consistency and burden for l10n. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 33749] Inconsistencies in Help pages on Cell Merging and Splitting (unmerging) in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33749 --- Comment #24 from Rafael Lima --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #23) > Not a native speaker so with grain of salt: "Split" is more common and > natural than "Unmerge" which implies that something has been merged before. > All this discussion is quite academic to me. But OTOH renaming is pretty > easy. However, where is "Split"? Hi Heiko. Just to be clear, in Writer the terminology is correct: "Split Cells". This is correct because in Writer, if you add a table you can select any cell and split it further. And the newly created cells can be split again, and again... In Calc it is not possible to Split a cell. If you select a single cell, it is not possible to split it in two. The only thing that can be done is first to merge cells and later "Unmerge" them restoring their original situation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 33749] Inconsistencies in Help pages on Cell Merging and Splitting (unmerging) in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33749 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tion.org|.freedesktop.org --- Comment #23 from Heiko Tietze --- Not a native speaker so with grain of salt: "Split" is more common and natural than "Unmerge" which implies that something has been merged before. All this discussion is quite academic to me. But OTOH renaming is pretty easy. However, where is "Split"? The command in question is .uno:ToggleMergeCells with the label "Merge and Center Cells" (center means that regardless the alignment before the content will be cenetered). It splits/unmerges if applied to a previously merged cell. We also have a checkbox in the sidebar "[ ] Merge cells" with the tooltip "Joins the selected cells into one"… The command .uno:MergeCells (under Format > Merge) just merges and becomes disabled on previously merged cells. The pendant command is .uno:SplitCell with the label "Split Cells". My take => NAB. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
