[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories ( Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|andr...@ahunt.org   |libreoffice-b...@lists.free
   ||desktop.org

--- Comment #21 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Setting Assignee back to default. Please assign it back to yourself if you're
still working on this issue

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories ( Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

--- Comment #20 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Hello,
Is this bug fixed?
If so, could you please close it as RESOLVED FIXED?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Katarina Behrens (CIB)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|needsDevEval topicUI|

--- Comment #18 from Katarina Behrens (CIB)  ---
No easy hack at all

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

--- Comment #19 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Tor Lillqvist committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=95e13b89ecb70eb0a03a0c68f0f1e41d02acef22

tdf#36946: Organise transitions hierarchically

It will be available in 5.1.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| target:5.1.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Yousuf (Jay) Philips  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||philip...@hotmail.com
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87
   ||613,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87
   ||621
 Whiteboard|EasyHack|needsDevEval topicUI

--- Comment #17 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips  ---
Moving variants to a separate listbox is suggested in bug 87621. Alphabetically
sorting the list and also grouping them is suggested in bug 87613.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

--- Comment #15 from Tor Lillqvist  ---
I guess the only consensus is that the current situation is not good. A list
that is not sorted in any meaningful way (even if there is some "clustering" of
similar transitions, but then for instance two different dissolves in widely
separate locations).

So something needs to be done, and (as always) preferably in small steps that
can be achieved without large amounts of work (which might not be available).
For instance, I don't think I have the skills or time to design graphical UI
elements for categories of transitions. (Hint, hint.)

Would a good first step be to divide the list into parts, with dividers, as
suggested in the second example in comment #12? I guess, especially taking L10N
issues into consideration, that my minimal patch that simply sorts the current
list https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/19648/ is not a good idea, as it might
move related transitions (that currently luckily are grouped) far from each
others in languages where the more specific subtype of a transition comes first
in its name?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

Tor Lillqvist  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 36946] Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

--- Comment #16 from Thorsten Behrens  ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #15)
> Would a good first step be to divide the list into parts, with dividers, as
> suggested in the second example in comment #12?
>
Yep, from my side.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise