Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-09-10 Thread Krisztian Pinter
Hi all!

I created a patch with some of the suggested changes to see how they look:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/5901/
The get more templates button was moved to the template manager, it has a
temporary icon.


On 6 September 2013 16:18, Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Emir Yâsin SARI bitig...@me.com wrote:



 6 Eyl 2013 tarihinde 17:47 saatinde, Tor Lillqvist şunları yazdı:

  IMHO, it'd be great if LibreOffice could present each of its modules as
 completely separate applications,


 Hmm, that would mean LOTS of changes to our packaging and distribution on
 OS X (something for which there isn't exactly an abundance of engineering
 resources), where there now is just one app bundle, LibreOffice.app. You
 mean there would be separate LibreOfficeWriter.app, LibreOfficeCalc.app,
 etc? Where would their shared code be? (Duplicated in each app? Sure, that
 would work, but the usual suspects would whine think of the people who
 have to pay $$ per megabyte of download) How would installing such a thing
 work, if on a .dmg, dragging each .app separately to /Applications? Etc...

 I think current approach is better, it also gives a seamless interaction
 between components, like editing Calc sheets in Writer which MS Office on
 Mac cannot do, but what LibreOffice needs is separate component links, like
 the ability to put Calc or Writer separately on Dock, eliminating extra
 clicks, though I am not sure if it is possible or not. In any case it would
 require some separation of components.


 Exactly. I'd like the Mac version to present modules in exactly the same
 way they are presented on Linux and Windows. (To the user, they seem like
 separate applications.) How that would be best done, though, I have no clue.
 I know the Office:Mac installer automatically creates all the shortcuts to
 the different applications, but I'm betting that that kind of installer
 would require the changes you mentioned. And I have no clue how to separate
 things like Exposé or the application menu.

 That said, what I said earlier was targeted at Linux/Windows, where the
 separation exists already, it just isn't complete.

 ___
 Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
 Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-09-06 Thread Mirek M.
Hi Emir,

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Emir Yâsin SARI bitig...@me.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I'd like to point out some ideas of mine for the new start center as well,

 1. Tabs labeled All, Documents, Spreadsheets etc. would look better if
 they are located right under the window bar, currently they look like
 they've been pressed down by the Open/Templates buttons and LibreOffice
 logo area.


+1


 2. Changing the application background colour from settings change the SC
 background as well as usual, and LibreOffice logo looks bad under certain
 colours, not readable at all. Personally I am not sure if we ever need a LO
 logo for the Start Center, it just takes up space.


+1 to getting rid of the logo


 3. Info, Get Templates, Get Extensions buttons should be located on the
 lower corner, not upper. Again waste of space.


Not sure if these are relevant here as well.
Get Templates would be better off in the Template manager, Get Extensions
in the Extension manager, and it's enough to have Info, which just links to
the homepage, in the About dialog.


 4. Open/Templates buttons are very very big, and they look very alienated
 on OS X. Have no idea about the other platforms.


Ideally, these should be toolbar buttons, as in the proposal. [1]


 5. New document buttons under the tabs are also very big, they do not look
 native, and they leave very valuable space wasted on the right side of the
 buttons. Same case for the small buttons under the All Recent tab.


+1


 6. Also mentioned here before, Recent Documents are would offer more file
 manager capabilities, basic functions like longer file names, ability to
 dragdrop, a search bar, and a system right click context menu!


The long-term goal for the Start Center, at least how I envision it, is
similar to that of mobile/web applications or Apple's Document Library [2]:
have an application-specific file browser with a simple one-level folder
hierarchy with the primary function of finding and opening a file, not
managing it.

Based on that, drag-and-drop, to me, makes only sense in terms of grouping
documents into folders, in a similar way to the way folders work on the
Android or iOS homescreen or in Apple's Document Library. Did you mean that
or did you have something else in mind?
A search bar makes sense as well.
Instead of a right-click system menu, I'd prefer to reserve the right click
for selection, as is the behavior of the new kind of Windows 8 apps and the
new Gnome apps (Documents, Clocks, ...). By selecting something, the
toolbar should change to present selection-relevant commands, which is the
same as you'd expect from a right-click menu, with the advantage of being
more discoverable and touch-accessible.

Also, what exactly do you mean by Longer file names? Does the current
implementation not allow long filenames? Or do you mean showing the whole
file name no matter how long it is?

7. When a recent document is opened, window should maximise itself by
 default,  at least there should be an option to maximise the window
 automatically, a normal user would probably maximise the window area after
 opening a document.


This setting should be saved with the document. It should have nothing to
do with the Start Center.


 8. As a long term goal, it would be better to merge templates window into
 the start center.


It'd be good if these two could share as much as possible, though I'm not
100% sure they should be merged. I have no idea about the technical
aspects, though, so I don't have an educated opinion on this.

[1]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center#Proposal_by_Mirek2
[2] http://ia.net/blog/mountain-lions-new-file-system/
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-09-06 Thread Mirek M.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Alexander Thurgood 
alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Le 24/07/13 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :


 One major problem with document previews is that there are none for ODB
 files. When one works with ODT and ODB files regularly (as I do), this
 makes for one ugly startscreen, interspersed with ODT previews and Base
 app icons. Unfortunately, I do not know what could be done about this,
 other than perhaps providing a fake placeholder preview for the ODB
 documents, but I've no idea how that would work or what form it could take.


The Base tab itself could be presented as a list rather than a grid.

IMHO, it'd be great if LibreOffice could present each of its modules as
completely separate applications, regardless of the fact that it's really
just one.
Launching a module would launch the module-specific section of the Start
Center, only without tabs for the other modules. It would, in effect, be
very much like mobile apps or Apple's Document Library [1]. The advantage
of that would be being able to tweak the UI of each module based on the
content it works with.

[1] http://ia.net/blog/mountain-lions-new-file-system/
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-09-06 Thread Tor Lillqvist

 IMHO, it'd be great if LibreOffice could present each of its modules as
 completely separate applications,


Hmm, that would mean LOTS of changes to our packaging and distribution on
OS X (something for which there isn't exactly an abundance of engineering
resources), where there now is just one app bundle, LibreOffice.app. You
mean there would be separate LibreOfficeWriter.app, LibreOfficeCalc.app,
etc? Where would their shared code be? (Duplicated in each app? Sure, that
would work, but the usual suspects would whine think of the people who
have to pay $$ per megabyte of download) How would installing such a thing
work, if on a .dmg, dragging each .app separately to /Applications? Etc...

--tml
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-09-06 Thread Emir Yâsin SARI


6 Eyl 2013 tarihinde 17:47 saatinde, Tor Lillqvist şunları yazdı:

 IMHO, it'd be great if LibreOffice could present each of its modules as 
 completely separate applications,
 
 Hmm, that would mean LOTS of changes to our packaging and distribution on OS 
 X (something for which there isn't exactly an abundance of engineering 
 resources), where there now is just one app bundle, LibreOffice.app. You mean 
 there would be separate LibreOfficeWriter.app, LibreOfficeCalc.app, etc? 
 Where would their shared code be? (Duplicated in each app? Sure, that would 
 work, but the usual suspects would whine think of the people who have to pay 
 $$ per megabyte of download) How would installing such a thing work, if on a 
 .dmg, dragging each .app separately to /Applications? Etc...

I think current approach is better, it also gives a seamless interaction 
between components, like editing Calc sheets in Writer which MS Office on Mac 
cannot do, but what LibreOffice needs is separate component links, like the 
ability to put Calc or Writer separately on Dock, eliminating extra clicks, 
though I am not sure if it is possible or not. In any case it would require 
some separation of components. 

Emir

___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-09-06 Thread Mirek M.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Emir Yâsin SARI bitig...@me.com wrote:



 6 Eyl 2013 tarihinde 17:47 saatinde, Tor Lillqvist şunları yazdı:

 IMHO, it'd be great if LibreOffice could present each of its modules as
 completely separate applications,


 Hmm, that would mean LOTS of changes to our packaging and distribution on
 OS X (something for which there isn't exactly an abundance of engineering
 resources), where there now is just one app bundle, LibreOffice.app. You
 mean there would be separate LibreOfficeWriter.app, LibreOfficeCalc.app,
 etc? Where would their shared code be? (Duplicated in each app? Sure, that
 would work, but the usual suspects would whine think of the people who
 have to pay $$ per megabyte of download) How would installing such a thing
 work, if on a .dmg, dragging each .app separately to /Applications? Etc...

 I think current approach is better, it also gives a seamless interaction
 between components, like editing Calc sheets in Writer which MS Office on
 Mac cannot do, but what LibreOffice needs is separate component links, like
 the ability to put Calc or Writer separately on Dock, eliminating extra
 clicks, though I am not sure if it is possible or not. In any case it would
 require some separation of components.


Exactly. I'd like the Mac version to present modules in exactly the same
way they are presented on Linux and Windows. (To the user, they seem like
separate applications.) How that would be best done, though, I have no clue.
I know the Office:Mac installer automatically creates all the shortcuts to
the different applications, but I'm betting that that kind of installer
would require the changes you mentioned. And I have no clue how to separate
things like Exposé or the application menu.

That said, what I said earlier was targeted at Linux/Windows, where the
separation exists already, it just isn't complete.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-26 Thread Emir Yâsin SARI
Hello,

I'd like to point out some ideas of mine for the new start center as well,

1. Tabs labeled All, Documents, Spreadsheets etc. would look better if they are 
located right under the window bar, currently they look like they've been 
pressed down by the Open/Templates buttons and LibreOffice logo area. 
2. Changing the application background colour from settings change the SC 
background as well as usual, and LibreOffice logo looks bad under certain 
colours, not readable at all. Personally I am not sure if we ever need a LO 
logo for the Start Center, it just takes up space. 
3. Info, Get Templates, Get Extensions buttons should be located on the lower 
corner, not upper. Again waste of space. 
4. Open/Templates buttons are very very big, and they look very alienated on OS 
X. Have no idea about the other platforms. 
5. New document buttons under the tabs are also very big, they do not look 
native, and they leave very valuable space wasted on the right side of the 
buttons. Same case for the small buttons under the All Recent tab.
6. Also mentioned here before, Recent Documents are would offer more file 
manager capabilities, basic functions like longer file names, ability to 
dragdrop, a search bar, and a system right click context menu!
7. When a recent document is opened, window should maximise itself by default,  
at least there should be an option to maximise the window automatically, a 
normal user would probably maximise the window area after opening a document. 
8. As a long term goal, it would be better to merge templates window into the 
start center. 

Best regards,

Emir Yâsin SARI
bitig...@me.com



18 Ağu 2013 tarihinde 14:16 saatinde, Mirek M. şunları yazdı:

 On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure 
 jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Le 14/08/2013 08:51, Mirek M. a écrit :
  On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
  jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org mailto:jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
 
  Hi Krisztian,
 
  Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
   Hi all!
  
   I'm working on this GSoC
   project:
  
  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center
 
  I just tried the first implementation of the new startcenter in the
  master. It is interesting to view the recent documents but there is a
  problem in the actual implementation in which it is impossible to see
  the entire name of the file. Do you plan to offer different views of the
  list, like icons, detailed list and compact list?
 
 
  My opinion on the matter:
  It'd be good to keep the number of views simple.
  A detailed list makes sense, but I don't see much of a point in an icon
  list (thumbnails are much more informational, icons just show the file
  type and are completely useless when you're not on the All tab).
 
 I disagree, icons are useful even when you are not on the All tab to
 distinguish between ODF, MSO files or other document formats.
 
 AFAIK, we don't have separate icons for the various file formats right now.
 However, if easy separation between these formats was something we needed, we 
 could simply add labels to our thumbnails instead.
 This would add clutter, though, so perhaps presenting this information as a 
 file extension might be better.
  
 I think thumbnails are informational if you have the possibility to zoom
 temporary on a particular thumbnail to see a more detailed view. In
 other cases I prefer icons and filenames.
 
 You should use list view, then. :)
 
  I'm not in favor of a compact list either -- if you need a list, use the
  detailed list view, if you need to browse quickly, use the thumbnail
  view. I realize that the compact view is much more compact, but it
  doesn't seem worth the work and the UI overhead.
 
 I agree, it was just an example of the different possible views.
 
 
 
  In the mockup (here:
  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center) the
  filenames follow the old ms-dos 8 digit rule; am I wrong if I assume
  that, today, nobody still uses that rule in the real life ? ;-)
 
 
  Sorry, I left out the handling of long names from the proposal.
  Given that Gnome Documents [1] uses the same layout, how about adopting
  their way -- limiting the filename to two rows, and if it doesn't fit,
  cutting it off about 8 characters from the end of the word, if I'm not
  mistaken. You can ask Jon McCann or Jakub Steiner about the specifics,
  if you'd like.
 
 Why only 2 rows? If the files systems allow to have long filenames,
 applications should not decide to nullify this functionality.
 
 I was basing the design on that of Gnome Documents, where the reasoning is to 
 keep a nice layout going.
 iWork and Google Drive go even further and allow one line for filenames.
 
 Perhaps you're right, though -- maybe we should leave the file 

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-26 Thread Tor Lillqvist

 4. Open/Templates buttons are very very big, and they look very alienated
 on OS X. Have no idea about the other platforms.


Well, the whole Start Centre concept is alien to OS X and Windows if you
ask me... That we use it on those platforms, too, is just because we don't
have resources to DTRT.

--tml
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-26 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 24/07/13 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :


One major problem with document previews is that there are none for ODB
files. When one works with ODT and ODB files regularly (as I do), this
makes for one ugly startscreen, interspersed with ODT previews and Base
app icons. Unfortunately, I do not know what could be done about this,
other than perhaps providing a fake placeholder preview for the ODB
documents, but I've no idea how that would work or what form it could take.


Alex

___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-26 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 26/08/13 09:42, Tor Lillqvist a écrit :


 
 Well, the whole Start Centre concept is alien to OS X and Windows if you
 ask me... That we use it on those platforms, too, is just because we
 don't have resources to DTRT.
 

Yup.

For example, when you launch the Pages application, you get the basic
OSX Finder window in the default directory where documents are stored
(i.e. Documents), and a New Document button to the bottom left of
the window. Clicking on this then opens the Template dialog window, with
a list of possible template categories in the left hand pane, and
previews of these templates in the main window pane. Note that the
templates are displayed as if they were on a lighttable, with a black
background.

TextEdit does the OSX Finder dialog first.

MS Word/Excel/Powerpoint 2011 for Mac opens the Template dialog window
immediately, without going through a Finder dialog first, using a same
black background lighttable display. Online templates are available by a
simple click on the corresponding menu entry in the left hand pane.

The nearest I've found to the proposed new LO startscreen on OSX is
Scribus 1.3.8 ;-)



Alex



___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-18 Thread Mirek M.
Hi,

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure 
jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:

 Hi,

 Le 14/08/2013 08:51, Mirek M. a écrit :
  On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
  jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org mailto:jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
 
  Hi Krisztian,
 
  Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
   Hi all!
  
   I'm working on this GSoC
   project:
 
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center
 
  I just tried the first implementation of the new startcenter in the
  master. It is interesting to view the recent documents but there is a
  problem in the actual implementation in which it is impossible to see
  the entire name of the file. Do you plan to offer different views of
 the
  list, like icons, detailed list and compact list?
 
 
  My opinion on the matter:
  It'd be good to keep the number of views simple.
  A detailed list makes sense, but I don't see much of a point in an icon
  list (thumbnails are much more informational, icons just show the file
  type and are completely useless when you're not on the All tab).

 I disagree, icons are useful even when you are not on the All tab to
 distinguish between ODF, MSO files or other document formats.


AFAIK, we don't have separate icons for the various file formats right now.
However, if easy separation between these formats was something we needed,
we could simply add labels to our thumbnails instead.
This would add clutter, though, so perhaps presenting this information as a
file extension might be better.


 I think thumbnails are informational if you have the possibility to zoom
 temporary on a particular thumbnail to see a more detailed view. In
 other cases I prefer icons and filenames.


You should use list view, then. :)


  I'm not in favor of a compact list either -- if you need a list, use the
  detailed list view, if you need to browse quickly, use the thumbnail
  view. I realize that the compact view is much more compact, but it
  doesn't seem worth the work and the UI overhead.

 I agree, it was just an example of the different possible views.

 
 
  In the mockup (here:
  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center)
 the
  filenames follow the old ms-dos 8 digit rule; am I wrong if I assume
  that, today, nobody still uses that rule in the real life ? ;-)
 
 
  Sorry, I left out the handling of long names from the proposal.
  Given that Gnome Documents [1] uses the same layout, how about adopting
  their way -- limiting the filename to two rows, and if it doesn't fit,
  cutting it off about 8 characters from the end of the word, if I'm not
  mistaken. You can ask Jon McCann or Jakub Steiner about the specifics,
  if you'd like.

 Why only 2 rows? If the files systems allow to have long filenames,
 applications should not decide to nullify this functionality.


I was basing the design on that of Gnome Documents, where the reasoning is
to keep a nice layout going.
iWork and Google Drive go even further and allow one line for filenames.

Perhaps you're right, though -- maybe we should leave the file names up to
the user. Still, I'd be more comfortable limiting the name to at least 3 or
4 rows, to make sure a single file doesn't completely break the layout.


 In a detailed list view, each column should be adjustable. Indeed it is
 very common to have filenames longer than 30 characters and
 distinguishable only by their last characters (for example when using
 suffixes like _v01, _v02, etc.).


Yes -- that's why the cuttoff should leave about 8 characters at the end of
the word. (Gnome's example is Filetype icon is really a severe
an..xception.)


 As the new StartCenter becomes a kind of document manager, it should be
 very useful if it allowed to right-click on a document to display some
 useful informations like size, pathname, last modified date, etc.


 From an accessibility point of view, tooltips should be displayed in the
 thumbnails view.


Tooltips with what information?
(Tooltips should show the full title if it's cut off.)


 Another function which could be very useful is remove all not existent
 local files from the recent files list.


This should be done automatically, not with a button.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-18 Thread Mirek M.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure 
 jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:

 Hi,

 Le 14/08/2013 08:51, Mirek M. a écrit :
  On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
  jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org mailto:jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
 
  Hi Krisztian,
 
  Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
   Hi all!
  
   I'm working on this GSoC
   project:
 
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center
 
  I just tried the first implementation of the new startcenter in the
  master. It is interesting to view the recent documents but there is
 a
  problem in the actual implementation in which it is impossible to
 see
  the entire name of the file. Do you plan to offer different views
 of the
  list, like icons, detailed list and compact list?
 
 
  My opinion on the matter:
  It'd be good to keep the number of views simple.
  A detailed list makes sense, but I don't see much of a point in an icon
  list (thumbnails are much more informational, icons just show the file
  type and are completely useless when you're not on the All tab).

 I disagree, icons are useful even when you are not on the All tab to
 distinguish between ODF, MSO files or other document formats.


 AFAIK, we don't have separate icons for the various file formats right now.
 However, if easy separation between these formats was something we needed,
 we could simply add labels to our thumbnails instead.
 This would add clutter, though, so perhaps presenting this information as
 a file extension might be better.


 I think thumbnails are informational if you have the possibility to zoom
 temporary on a particular thumbnail to see a more detailed view. In
 other cases I prefer icons and filenames.


 You should use list view, then. :)


  I'm not in favor of a compact list either -- if you need a list, use the
  detailed list view, if you need to browse quickly, use the thumbnail
  view. I realize that the compact view is much more compact, but it
  doesn't seem worth the work and the UI overhead.

 I agree, it was just an example of the different possible views.

 
 
  In the mockup (here:
  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center)
 the
  filenames follow the old ms-dos 8 digit rule; am I wrong if I assume
  that, today, nobody still uses that rule in the real life ? ;-)
 
 
  Sorry, I left out the handling of long names from the proposal.
  Given that Gnome Documents [1] uses the same layout, how about adopting
  their way -- limiting the filename to two rows, and if it doesn't fit,
  cutting it off about 8 characters from the end of the word, if I'm not
  mistaken. You can ask Jon McCann or Jakub Steiner about the specifics,
  if you'd like.

 Why only 2 rows? If the files systems allow to have long filenames,
 applications should not decide to nullify this functionality.


 I was basing the design on that of Gnome Documents, where the reasoning is
 to keep a nice layout going.
 iWork and Google Drive go even further and allow one line for filenames.

 Perhaps you're right, though -- maybe we should leave the file names up to
 the user. Still, I'd be more comfortable limiting the name to at least 3 or
 4 rows, to make sure a single file doesn't completely break the layout.


 In a detailed list view, each column should be adjustable.


Forgot to comment this:
Here, again, I'd like to adopt the Gnome Documents layout, which is not
adjustable, but works well with just about any reasonable window size.
The columns are:
1) Small thumbnails
2) Titile on the first row, the author in a lighter font on the second row.
This column has maximum width.
3) File type (for us, simply ODF or DOC would do)
4) Local vs. cloud storage (not applicable for us right now)
5) Date of last edit.

That said, maybe the list view is a bit premature at this point.

Indeed it is
 very common to have filenames longer than 30 characters and
 distinguishable only by their last characters (for example when using
 suffixes like _v01, _v02, etc.).


 Yes -- that's why the cuttoff should leave about 8 characters at the end
 of the word. (Gnome's example is Filetype icon is really a severe
 an..xception.)


 As the new StartCenter becomes a kind of document manager, it should be
 very useful if it allowed to right-click on a document to display some
 useful informations like size, pathname, last modified date, etc.


 From an accessibility point of view, tooltips should be displayed in the
 thumbnails view.


 Tooltips with what information?
 (Tooltips should show the full title if it's cut off.)


 Another function which could be very useful is remove all not existent
 local files from the recent files list.


 This should be done automatically, not with a button.

___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing 

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-16 Thread Krisztian Pinter
Hi!

Thank you!

In the original mockup, new document buttons were on the all tab, I just
haven't added them yet in this first iteration, but I will later.

All the best,
Krisztian


On 16 August 2013 14:34, Niklas Johansson sleeping.pil...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi Krisztian

 Nice work so far.

 I'm no UX-expert but one thing that struck me when trying out the new
 start center was that I did not immediately find how to open an empty
 document. I had to choose a category to find the new document button.
 Wouldn't it make sense to add all buttons (new document, new spreadsheet,
 new ...) to the all tab?

 Regards,
 Niklas Johansson

 Krisztian Pinter skrev 2013-07-24 18:16:

  Hi all!

  I'm working on this GSoC project:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center

  Currently, the Start Center (the start screen you get when you start
 LibreOffice) is only a static bitmap, with few buttons and links. It would
 be useful to present few recently used documents there (as thumbnails), and
 do more fancy stuff.
 See this overview and WidgetLayout to get more information about the
 Widget Layout (this part is actually very similar to the above mentioned
 task). Additionally, code for rendering the thumbnails will have to be
 introduced, and maybe some code sharing with the new Template Manager will
 be needed too.

  I've already converted the current startcenter to .ui, and it has been
 merged to master, but it's still being improved. I'm currently working on
 adding thumbnails for recent docs.

  I'd like to request a mockup for the startcenter (with thumbnails for
 recent docs), so we can make it look nice and pretty.

  Kendy, my GSoC mentor, listed these points as his preference:
  * Keep the buttons to start apps some way (but they could be smaller or
 organized another way
  * Keep the LibreOffice logo, but the other visual things (like the
 shadows etc.) might go from my point of view
  * Make it resizable, so that the screen size is better used (ie. no
 more fixed rectangle in the middle of the screen)

  Looking forward to your feedback!

  All the best,
  Krisztian


 ___
 Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing 
 listLibreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.orghttp://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise



 ___
 Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
 Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi Krisztian,

Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
 Hi all!
 
 I'm working on this GSoC
 project: 
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center

Another problem with the current implementation: it seems not possible
to browse the recent files by using left and right arrays on the
keyboard, it is only possible to click on thumbnails with the mouse
which is not the most efficient for many users.

Best regards.
JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-14 Thread Mirek M.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure 
jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:

 Hi Krisztian,

 Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
  Hi all!
 
  I'm working on this GSoC
  project:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center

 I just tried the first implementation of the new startcenter in the
 master. It is interesting to view the recent documents but there is a
 problem in the actual implementation in which it is impossible to see
 the entire name of the file. Do you plan to offer different views of the
 list, like icons, detailed list and compact list?


My opinion on the matter:
It'd be good to keep the number of views simple.
A detailed list makes sense, but I don't see much of a point in an icon
list (thumbnails are much more informational, icons just show the file type
and are completely useless when you're not on the All tab). I'm not in
favor of a compact list either -- if you need a list, use the detailed list
view, if you need to browse quickly, use the thumbnail view. I realize that
the compact view is much more compact, but it doesn't seem worth the work
and the UI overhead.


 In the mockup (here:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center) the
 filenames follow the old ms-dos 8 digit rule; am I wrong if I assume
 that, today, nobody still uses that rule in the real life ? ;-)


Sorry, I left out the handling of long names from the proposal.
Given that Gnome Documents [1] uses the same layout, how about adopting
their way -- limiting the filename to two rows, and if it doesn't fit,
cutting it off about 8 characters from the end of the word, if I'm not
mistaken. You can ask Jon McCann or Jakub Steiner about the specifics, if
you'd like.

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Documents#Tentative_Design
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi,

Le 14/08/2013 08:51, Mirek M. a écrit :
 On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
 jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org mailto:jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
 
 Hi Krisztian,
 
 Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
  Hi all!
 
  I'm working on this GSoC
  project:
 
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center
 
 I just tried the first implementation of the new startcenter in the
 master. It is interesting to view the recent documents but there is a
 problem in the actual implementation in which it is impossible to see
 the entire name of the file. Do you plan to offer different views of the
 list, like icons, detailed list and compact list?
 
 
 My opinion on the matter:
 It'd be good to keep the number of views simple.
 A detailed list makes sense, but I don't see much of a point in an icon
 list (thumbnails are much more informational, icons just show the file
 type and are completely useless when you're not on the All tab). 

I disagree, icons are useful even when you are not on the All tab to
distinguish between ODF, MSO files or other document formats.
I think thumbnails are informational if you have the possibility to zoom
temporary on a particular thumbnail to see a more detailed view. In
other cases I prefer icons and filenames.

 I'm not in favor of a compact list either -- if you need a list, use the
 detailed list view, if you need to browse quickly, use the thumbnail
 view. I realize that the compact view is much more compact, but it
 doesn't seem worth the work and the UI overhead.

I agree, it was just an example of the different possible views.

 
 
 In the mockup (here:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center) the
 filenames follow the old ms-dos 8 digit rule; am I wrong if I assume
 that, today, nobody still uses that rule in the real life ? ;-)
 
 
 Sorry, I left out the handling of long names from the proposal.
 Given that Gnome Documents [1] uses the same layout, how about adopting
 their way -- limiting the filename to two rows, and if it doesn't fit,
 cutting it off about 8 characters from the end of the word, if I'm not
 mistaken. You can ask Jon McCann or Jakub Steiner about the specifics,
 if you'd like.

Why only 2 rows? If the files systems allow to have long filenames,
applications should not decide to nullify this functionality.

In a detailed list view, each column should be adjustable. Indeed it is
very common to have filenames longer than 30 characters and
distinguishable only by their last characters (for example when using
suffixes like _v01, _v02, etc.).

As the new StartCenter becomes a kind of document manager, it should be
very useful if it allowed to right-click on a document to display some
useful informations like size, pathname, last modified date, etc.

From an accessibility point of view, tooltips should be displayed in the
thumbnails view.

Another function which could be very useful is remove all not existent
local files from the recent files list.

Best regards.
JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-08-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi Krisztian,

Le 24/07/2013 18:16, Krisztian Pinter a écrit :
 Hi all!
 
 I'm working on this GSoC
 project: 
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center

I just tried the first implementation of the new startcenter in the
master. It is interesting to view the recent documents but there is a
problem in the actual implementation in which it is impossible to see
the entire name of the file. Do you plan to offer different views of the
list, like icons, detailed list and compact list?

In the mockup (here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center) the
filenames follow the old ms-dos 8 digit rule; am I wrong if I assume
that, today, nobody still uses that rule in the real life ? ;-)


Best regards.
JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [GSoC] Use Widget Layout for the Start Center

2013-07-26 Thread Mirek M.
Hi Krisztian,

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Krisztian Pinter
pin.termina...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all!

 I'm working on this GSoC project:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#Use_Widget_Layout_for_the_Start_Center

 Currently, the Start Center (the start screen you get when you start
 LibreOffice) is only a static bitmap, with few buttons and links. It would
 be useful to present few recently used documents there (as thumbnails), and
 do more fancy stuff.
 See this overview and WidgetLayout to get more information about the
 Widget Layout (this part is actually very similar to the above mentioned
 task). Additionally, code for rendering the thumbnails will have to be
 introduced, and maybe some code sharing with the new Template Manager will
 be needed too.


Sounds good. I was about to say that perhaps you could try to reuse the
Template Manager's thumbnail rendering.


 I've already converted the current startcenter to .ui, and it has been
 merged to master, but it's still being improved. I'm currently working on
 adding thumbnails for recent docs.

 I'd like to request a mockup for the startcenter (with thumbnails for
 recent docs), so we can make it look nice and pretty.


I started a whiteboard for it:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/Start_Center.


 Kendy, my GSoC mentor, listed these points as his preference:
 * Keep the buttons to start apps some way (but they could be smaller or
 organized another way
 * Keep the LibreOffice logo, but the other visual things (like the
 shadows etc.) might go from my point of view
 * Make it resizable, so that the screen size is better used (ie. no more
 fixed rectangle in the middle of the screen)


I tried to incorporate these into the scope. Take a look at it and feel
free to make changes based on what you feel like doing. :)

Thanks for working on this!


 Looking forward to your feedback!

 All the best,
 Krisztian

 ___
 Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
 Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise