[LIB] unsubscribe
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:30:16 + From: David Oxtoby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unsubscribe unsubscribe
Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:43:01 +1100 From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review We've just taken delivery of a few OQO 01+'s for use on our robots ... it's a verrry nice little machine and Fedora Core 4 actually runs without too much stuffing around (although I didn't end up getting some of the devices to work - our robot has its own set of interfaces that just connect via USB) ... pitty the keyboard is darn hard to use - I prefer separate buttons such as those on the newer Zaurus C-series ... too hard to touchtype on a semi-membrane keyboard ... - Raymond At 01:24 PM 15/03/2006 -0800, you wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:24:32 -0800 (PST) From: David Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review http://www.mobilityguru.com/2006/03/14/is_the_world/index.html adorable toshiba libretto The latest news and information for the Toshiba Libretto owner. http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --- /~\ | | Does fuzzy logic tickle?| | ___ | My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup? | | /__/ +---| | / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! | | ICQ: 31756092 | www.raybot.net | \~/
Re: [LIB] Libretto 100CT at 300Mhz?!?!?!
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:30:21 -0500 From: Tony Oresteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto 100CT at 300Mhz?!?!?! I have a 100CT that I overclocked to 266MHz. It was unstable and when I used PCMCIA devices it would crash. I backed it back down to 233MHz and it has been running with no problems for over a year. Maybe a 110CT Mobo would go at 300MHz but I'd wouldn't try a 100CT ~~~ Tony Oresteen W1AJO Montverde, FL 34756 - Original Message - From: Jose Menendez Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Libretto libretto@basiclink.com Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: [LIB] Libretto 100CT at 300Mhz?!?!?! Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:09:48 +0100 From: Jose Menendez Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Libretto 100CT at 300Mhz?!?!?! Hi all, I´m working with a second hand Libretto 100Ct for to squeeze the maximun performance. i think that a Libretto 100Ct can run at 300Mhz: -. Looking the Pentium M datasheet, i can see that, only Pentium 1 Mobile (0.25micron) can be run at 300Mhz, the Lib have one this. -. Looking the CY2278A, the clock synthesizer of Lib 100CT motherboard, can be generate 20, 25, 33.33, 40, 50, 60, 66.67 and ..75Mhz. We can choose the 75Mhz for generate the 300Mhz pattern. Anybody have any experience with this? Maybe work or not, but i´m trying!!! José Menéndez RD - Software Designer. Natural Tools Plaza de España 18, planta 5 - Oficina 5 - 28008 Madrid - SPAIN Phone: +34 91 542 7976 Fax: +34 91 542 7028 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.naturalstudio.com
Re: [LIB] How do I unsibscribe?
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:12:22 -0500 From: Caleb Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] How do I unsibscribe? I believe you just need to put 'unsubscribe' with no 'cmd:' or anything else. Laurence Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/16/2006 02:51 PM Please respond to Libretto libretto@basiclink.com To Libretto libretto@basiclink.com cc Subject [LIB] How do I unsibscribe? Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:57:03 - From: Laurence Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How do I unsibscribe? Asked this question before, and got no reply, so am trying again.. How do I subscribe from this mailing list? I have tried sending a message to libretto@basiclink.com with the subject cmd:unsubscribe and that does not work. Thanks
Re: [LIB] How do I unsibscribe?
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:52:39 +1100 From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] How do I unsibscribe? Well, here's the instructions from way back when the list server actually sent instructions at the bottom of each email: ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: libretto@basiclink.com - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest ** I notice that your last post was a reply to a digest. If you're subscribed to the digest, you need an email with the subject cmd:unsubscribe digest to unsubscribe - the system will happily ignore cmd:unsubscribe if you're not subscribed to the list itself. And for reference to everyone else, unfortunately the system can't recognise alternative spellings of unsubscribe ;-D - Raymond P.S. Does anyone know what happened to libretto.basiclink.com? At 11:51 AM 16/03/2006 -0800, you wrote: Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:57:03 - From: Laurence Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How do I unsibscribe? Asked this question before, and got no reply, so am trying again.. How do I subscribe from this mailing list? I have tried sending a message to libretto@basiclink.com with the subject cmd:unsubscribe and that does not work. Thanks --- /~\ | | Does fuzzy logic tickle?| | ___ | My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup? | | /__/ +---| | / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! | | ICQ: 31756092 | www.raybot.net | \~/
OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:23:32 +1100 From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review) At 05:03 PM 15/03/2006 -0800, you wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:32:00 +0100 From: John Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review Are there any OQO owners on the list? Would you care to share your experiences? My main points of interest are: Well the first thing I'll say is we didn't get the OQOs to use as PDAs - we're mounting them under clear polycarbonate in the backs of our robots ... but I did have a bit of a play with one before we wiped it and put Linux on it ... I've got some answers below, if you've got any more you'd better ask quick before we wipe the rest of them! ;-) - How briskly does the OQO wake up from hibernation/standby? Quickly enough so that you can pull it from your pocket and look up a phone number without grinding your teeth? On a fresh install, takes about 3 seconds to come up out of standby. I imagine if you've got things like password protection or something that does something on resume or if you've got a pile of stuff open it'll take longer (my laptop takes about 10-20 seconds to come out of standby but most of that is spent paging like crazy because I tend to have a pile of stuff open and drivers that try to find wireless networks and the like). It takes about 4 seconds to go back into standby but again that's with almost nothing open. - Supposing you leave the OQO in hibernation/standby most of the time, just waking it up to look up phone numbers, jot down some notes, check your email, do a Mapquest search, etc, can you get through a whole day on a single battery charge? How about with the double-capacity battery? Haven't checked that yet ... like most (all?) modern laptops, the OQO uses almost no power in standby and if it's got battery life anything like my Zaurus you should be fine ... I'd think you'd get about 3 hours of use out of it however you break that usage up. If I get a chance to check and get results I'll get back to you ... - Is the keyboard at least as usable as, let's say, a Blackberry or a Treo keyboard? I've not used a Blackberry or a Treo but I've used a few others ... I'd put this keyboard at somewhere between the Sony Clie NX70 series and the UX50 ... it's not as good as the Zaurus C-series (the clamshell ones) and the extra size means that although the buttons aren't as good as some of the Palm clipon keyboards (the ones with individual rubber keys - can't remember the name) it does seem easier to type on. Basically it feels like a cheap membrane keyboard that they've put raised 'buttons' on top of to make it a little less likely that you'll accidentally press 2 buttons at once ... I guess it's one you can get used to but there aren't any raised indents on the F and J keys for instance so you've really got to look at the keyboard to type on it. Still, I recon it's useable ... just disappointing and somewhat annoying (I can almost touchtype on my Zaurus). Individual keys and raised indents on the F and J keys would be nice. The keys are also laid out in a square grid so I do find myself with my thumbs between keys on the upper and lower rows (the Zaurus has them laid out properly so I get used to that) but that's probably something to get used to. You certainly won't be doing any more than thumb typing on this keyboard. One interesting thing is the screen - it's not a touch screen as such - you poke it with your finger and nothing happens apart from fingerprints (which this screen shows quite badly). It's actually a proper tablet (under Linux it appears as a Wacom apparently - we haven't tried getting it working because we don't use it) so if you hover the stylus almost 2cm over it without touching it, the pointer still moves and you click by tapping the pen on the screen. The stylus (which as far as I can tell is passive - no batteries in it) also has a button which gives you right click. Pretty neat in that you don't need to worry about not resting your hand on the screen ... it also means you can put a solid screen protector (we're using pieces cut from CD cases) over it and still use the pen. I think at some point you might even be able to get pressure levels out of it. You can configure how hard or soft clicks need to be before they register for instance - and you can click in midair (eg. by holding a piece of clear plastic about 1cm over the screen and hitting that with the stylus) so it's doing something funky with how far and fast the stylus is moving up and down to determine that but I'm not sure if the driver actually makes that available to applications. If the answer to these is yes, I'll probably buy a OQO. I've been researching them for a while and they seem pretty good, though pricey. Yes indeed they are pricey ... they are nice little packages though. Personally, if I
Re: [LIB] Libretto 110 manual?
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:57:00 -0800 (PST) From: David Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto 110 manual? www.csd.toshiba.com has it in their support section . adorable toshiba libretto The latest news and information for the Toshiba Libretto owner. http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:10:40 -0800 (PST) From: David Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 read up on more chat about the oqo in the forums here: http://www.oqotalk.com/ adorable toshiba libretto The latest news and information for the Toshiba Libretto owner. http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:38:51 -0800 From: John Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review I get my phone through work, so it is by necessity a Blackberry. I like the Blackberry for email and tolerate it for voice, but don't feel it does anything else well. Even if I could choose my phone freely, in the US the cellphone companies are not very adventuresome in their phone offerings and Verizon, my preferred carrier, is among the least adventuresome. I was just in Europe and saw some smartphones that certainly looked very nice. If I were there, I'd probably try something like a Nokia Communicator. On Mar 15, 2006, at 5:59 PM, Jose Tavares wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:59:27 -0300 From: Jose Tavares [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 17:03 -0800, John Liu wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:32:00 +0100 From: John Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review Are there any OQO owners on the list? Would you care to share your experiences? My main points of interest are: - How briskly does the OQO wake up from hibernation/standby? Quickly enough so that you can pull it from your pocket and look up a phone number without grinding your teeth? - Supposing you leave the OQO in hibernation/standby most of the time, just waking it up to look up phone numbers, jot down some notes, check your email, do a Mapquest search, etc, can you get through a whole day on a single battery charge? How about with the double-capacity battery? - Is the keyboard at least as usable as, let's say, a Blackberry or a Treo keyboard? If the answer to these is yes, I'll probably buy a OQO. I've been researching them for a while and they seem pretty good, though pricey. ] Why not using a Symbian phone instead..? I have one.. pretty good for my 400 contacts (with vcf backup), calendar, taking pictures, accessing simple www sites, taking notes.. The features of a Series60 phone are infinite.. You can even play games with lots of emulators.. You can watch divx movies too.. The battery lasts 2 days in normal use with this apps.. And it is resistent sufficiently to go everywhere with you.. And fits in your pocket.. etc.. etc.. :) A question for you.. Don't you think windowsXP is full-featured for your target app? It just needs a good processor and a big battery to stay up for just a few hours.. My Series60 gets its battery full charged in 1h20mins and lots of times I charge it for 10 minutes and it will give me more 3-7 hours.. Its battery is so cheap that I even care for it... I think the best purpose for OQO is it's capacity for conecting a usb keyboard and a external display .. Great for traveling from home to office for people without a internet connection and file server.. The question is that OQO is cool but has too much processing power that will give you too little battery.. I think too much processing power for it's bad keyboard/mouse, for not using it as a real computer.. Maybe a tuned OS would do better on this machine.. Linux? [] JA Tavares
