Re: OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100

2006-03-16 Thread David Chien
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:10:40 -0800 (PST)
From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100

read up on more chat about the oqo in the forums here:
http://www.oqotalk.com/

adorable toshiba libretto
The latest news and information for the Toshiba Libretto owner.
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100

2006-03-16 Thread Raymond

Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:23:32 +1100
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OQO 01+ impressions (was Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100
 review)

At 05:03 PM 15/03/2006 -0800, you wrote:

Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:32:00 +0100
From: John Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] OQO 1+ vs. Libretto U100 review

Are there any OQO owners on the list?  Would you care to share your
experiences?  My main points of interest are:


Well the first thing I'll say is we didn't get the OQOs to use as PDAs - 
we're mounting them under clear polycarbonate in the backs of our robots 
... but I did have a bit of a play with one before we wiped it and put 
Linux on it ... I've got some answers below, if you've got any more you'd 
better ask quick before we wipe the rest of them! ;-)





-  How briskly does the OQO wake up from hibernation/standby?
Quickly enough so that you can pull it from your pocket and look up a
phone number without grinding your teeth?


On a fresh install, takes about 3 seconds to come up out of standby. I 
imagine if you've got things like password protection or something that 
does something on resume or if you've got a pile of stuff open it'll take 
longer (my laptop takes about 10-20 seconds to come out of standby but most 
of that is spent paging like crazy because I tend to have a pile of stuff 
open and drivers that try to find wireless networks and the like). It takes 
about 4 seconds to go back into standby but again that's with almost 
nothing open.





-  Supposing you leave the OQO in hibernation/standby most of the
time, just waking it up to look up phone numbers, jot down some
notes, check your email, do a Mapquest search, etc, can you get
through a whole day on a single battery charge?  How about with the
double-capacity battery?


Haven't checked that yet ... like most (all?) modern laptops, the OQO uses 
almost no power in standby and if it's got battery life anything like my 
Zaurus you should be fine ... I'd think you'd get about 3 hours of use out 
of it however you break that usage up. If I get a chance to check and get 
results I'll get back to you ...






-  Is the keyboard at least as usable as, let's say, a Blackberry or
a Treo keyboard?


I've not used a Blackberry or a Treo but I've used a few others ... I'd put 
this keyboard at somewhere between the Sony Clie NX70 series and the UX50 
... it's not as good as the Zaurus C-series (the clamshell ones) and the 
extra size means that although the buttons aren't as good as some of the 
Palm clipon keyboards (the ones with individual rubber keys - can't 
remember the name) it does seem easier to type on. Basically it feels like 
a cheap membrane keyboard that they've put raised 'buttons' on top of to 
make it a little less likely that you'll accidentally press 2 buttons at 
once ... I guess it's one you can get used to but there aren't any raised 
indents on the F and J keys for instance so you've really got to look at 
the keyboard to type on it. Still, I recon it's useable ... just 
disappointing and somewhat annoying (I can almost touchtype on my Zaurus). 
Individual keys and raised indents on the F and J keys would be nice. The 
keys are also laid out in a square grid so I do find myself with my thumbs 
between keys on the upper and lower rows (the Zaurus has them laid out 
properly so I get used to that) but that's probably something to get used 
to. You certainly won't be doing any more than thumb typing on this keyboard.


One interesting thing is the screen - it's not a "touch screen" as such - 
you poke it with your finger and nothing happens apart from fingerprints 
(which this screen shows quite badly). It's actually a proper tablet (under 
Linux it appears as a Wacom apparently - we haven't tried getting it 
working because we don't use it) so if you hover the stylus almost 2cm over 
it without touching it, the pointer still moves and you click by tapping 
the pen on the screen. The stylus (which as far as I can tell is passive - 
no batteries in it) also has a button which gives you right click. Pretty 
neat in that you don't need to worry about not resting your hand on the 
screen ... it also means you can put a solid screen protector (we're using 
pieces cut from CD cases) over it and still use the pen. I think at some 
point you might even be able to get pressure levels out of it. You can 
configure how "hard" or "soft" clicks need to be before they register for 
instance - and you can "click" in midair (eg. by holding a piece of clear 
plastic about 1cm over the screen and hitting that with the stylus) so it's 
doing something funky with how far and fast the stylus is moving up and 
down to determine that but I'm not sure if the driver actually m