Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2012-10-08 23:29, Roumen Petrov wrote:
Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Roumen,
On 2012-10-07 11:37, Roumen Petrov wrote:
And now test fail in cross environment : linux for mingw host
Thanks for the report!
I have pushed this. Let me know if it doesn't help.
No comment.
Thank you, I'm assuming it finally works for everybody.
Did you think that world to follow you stupid patches ?
It is enough do throw out you commits to bring system in stable state again.
Ralf wrote so good code I cannot understand any Peter's patches.
Why you just don not use existing working fine macros ?
Please, make a useful suggestion instead of hand-waving it like
that. What working macros should I use? I also don't see where I'm
You even didn't wait 72 hours for feedback !
Each of you recent obvious (!!) patches break libtool.
introducing any new macros, can you please point that out for me?
And Ralf must write very special code indeed if his code somehow
makes it impossible for some to read the code others write.
[Ralf, if you're reading this, I hope you understand that I don't
think that's true, you write very good code, period]
In this particular case,
LT_AT_HOST_DATA([expout],
doesn't work as it creates \r\n newlines in expout, and $EGREP futzes
the newlines on MSYS so that the standard output ends up \n, causing
the test to blow up.
AT_HOST([expout],
doesn't work as $EGREP leaves the newlines alone for Linux-MinGW
(at least that's what I deduced from your report), and then you
have \n in expout and \r\n in standard output. And the test blows up.
Either that, or I misread your And now test fail in cross
environment : linux for mingw host message. I read it as if the
test worked without my patch changing LT_AT_HOST_DATA to AT_HOST,
Exactly .
and that the test failed with the patch.
Exactly after you fluctuations .
That message made me
assume that neither LT_AT_HOST_DATA nor AT_DATA works for this
test (and the only thing different in this test is that $EGREP
is used).
You must investigate more why in this particular case LT_AT_HOST_DATA
fail in you environment .
So, the newlines has to be normalized after the $EGREP, or the
test has to be rewritten in a deeper way.
Take care that LT_AT_HOST_DATA is used more then once !
And, as it happens, Ralf did not write the code I'm changing here,
it was written by Gary when he thankfully eradicated the legacy
testsuite, so I'm not sure why you're dragging Ralf into this?
You just wrote to the world that you don't know author of LT_AT_HOST_DATA !
Ralf did not write the code I'm changing here - ha ha ha .
You just point that you lack basic knowledge and experience with
libtool test suite .
With recent commits you just ask you commit privileges to be revoked due
lack of background knowledge
Peter, I hop that after 10 years you will reach level of Ralf .
Cheers,
Peter
Roumen
