[patch #9678] ltmain.sh: [_MSC_VER] should be [_WIN32] in one place

[Ileana Dumitrescu]

Update of patch#9678 (group libtool):

  Status:None => Done   
 Open/Closed:Open => Closed 

___

Follow-up Comment #1:

Thanks for the patch! I merged it in.


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Re: [patch #9678] ltmain.sh: [_MSC_VER] should be [_WIN32] in one place

[Roumen Petrov]

Simon Sobisch wrote:

[snip]

Details:

As noted in #109514 there are much more compilers for Win32 than the
proprietary MSVC and GCC "based" compilers.
All I'm aware of that match those criteria need process.h instead of unistd.h
(as [_MSC_VER] does), which is fixed with the attached patch.


Simon, does you patch means include process.h and etc. if platform is 
windows but not mingw* (i.e. gcc) ?


Roumen

[patch #9678] ltmain.sh: [_MSC_VER] should be [_WIN32] in one place

[Simon Sobisch]

URL:
  

 Summary: ltmain.sh: [_MSC_VER] should be [_WIN32] in one
place
 Project: GNU Libtool
Submitted by: mensch
Submitted on: Fri 17 Aug 2018 10:10:06 PM CEST
Category: None
Priority: 5 - Normal
  Status: None
 Privacy: Public
 Assigned to: None
Originator Email: 
 Open/Closed: Open
 Discussion Lock: Any

___

Details:

As noted in #109514 there are much more compilers for Win32 than the
proprietary MSVC and GCC "based" compilers.
All I'm aware of that match those criteria need process.h instead of unistd.h
(as [_MSC_VER] does), which is fixed with the attached patch.



___

File Attachments:


---
Date: Fri 17 Aug 2018 10:10:06 PM CEST  Name: ltmain_non_msc.diff  Size: 764B 
 By: mensch
Patch, the actual change needs *one* line to be changed...


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/