[libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore more files
ignore *.patch, cscope.po.out, cscope.in.out, tags Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com --- .gitignore |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1cd2d45..018b5d9 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ *.pyc *.rej *.s +*.patch *~ .deps .gdb_history @@ -181,10 +182,13 @@ /update.log Makefile Makefile.in +tags TAGS coverage cscope.files cscope.out +cscope.in.out +cscope.po.out results.log stamp-h stamp-h.in -- 1.7.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore more files
On 11/01/12 08:55, liguang wrote: ignore *.patch, cscope.po.out, cscope.in.out, tags Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com --- .gitignore |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1cd2d45..018b5d9 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ *.pyc *.rej *.s +*.patch The ordering is wrong here, you need to order this file alphabetically as our build scripts re-order it leaving dirty tree. *~ .deps .gdb_history @@ -181,10 +182,13 @@ /update.log Makefile Makefile.in +tags Tags were added yesterday by Michal TAGS coverage cscope.files cscope.out +cscope.in.out +cscope.po.out Same here, ordering is wrong. results.log stamp-h stamp-h.in Peter -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore more files
On 01.11.2012 10:07, Peter Krempa wrote: On 11/01/12 08:55, liguang wrote: ignore *.patch, cscope.po.out, cscope.in.out, tags Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com --- .gitignore |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1cd2d45..018b5d9 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ *.pyc *.rej *.s +*.patch The ordering is wrong here, you need to order this file alphabetically as our build scripts re-order it leaving dirty tree. *~ .deps .gdb_history @@ -181,10 +182,13 @@ /update.log Makefile Makefile.in +tags Tags were added yesterday by Michal TAGS coverage cscope.files cscope.out +cscope.in.out +cscope.po.out Same here, ordering is wrong. results.log stamp-h stamp-h.in Peter -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list Just a hint; yesterday my work flow was like this: - add 'tags' somewhere in .gitignore - ran 'git clean -fxd; ./autogen --system' which rearrange .gitignore - commit changes Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
[libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore more files
ignore *.patch, cscope.po.out, cscope.in.out Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com --- .gitignore |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1cd2d45..d2d6657 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ *.pyc *.rej *.s +*.patch *~ .deps .gdb_history @@ -185,6 +186,8 @@ TAGS coverage cscope.files cscope.out +cscope.in.out +cscope.po.out results.log stamp-h stamp-h.in -- 1.7.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore more files
On 10/29/2012 07:07 AM, liguang wrote: ignore *.patch, cscope.po.out, cscope.in.out Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com --- .gitignore |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1cd2d45..d2d6657 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ *.pyc *.rej *.s +*.patch It shouldn't spoil the repo even if we have *.patch files in already (in docs/api_extension/), but doesn't feel clean since there are such files. Anyone feels bad about changing this to '/*.patch' or adding '!/docs/api_extension/*.patch' to this? *~ .deps .gdb_history @@ -185,6 +186,8 @@ TAGS coverage cscope.files cscope.out +cscope.in.out +cscope.po.out results.log stamp-h stamp-h.in This one is ok. BTW: Why don't we have 'tags' in .gitignore as well (created by ctags target)? Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] gitignore: ignore more files
On 29.10.2012 10:00, Martin Kletzander wrote: On 10/29/2012 07:07 AM, liguang wrote: ignore *.patch, cscope.po.out, cscope.in.out Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com --- .gitignore |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1cd2d45..d2d6657 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ *.pyc *.rej *.s +*.patch It shouldn't spoil the repo even if we have *.patch files in already (in docs/api_extension/), but doesn't feel clean since there are such files. Anyone feels bad about changing this to '/*.patch' or adding '!/docs/api_extension/*.patch' to this? This is okay since adding *.patch to git repo doesn't feel okay (or showing it in git status output). Moreover, if somebody wants to add *.patch he would need explicit 'git add' which will make him think twice. ACK from me. *~ .deps .gdb_history @@ -185,6 +186,8 @@ TAGS coverage cscope.files cscope.out +cscope.in.out +cscope.po.out results.log stamp-h stamp-h.in This one is ok. BTW: Why don't we have 'tags' in .gitignore as well (created by ctags target)? Martin Yeah, we should add 'tags' as well. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
