Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] Fix virDiskNameToIndex to actually ignore partition numbers
On 11/22/2012 05:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com The docs for virDiskNameToIndex claim it ignores partition numbers. In actual fact though, a code ordering buy means s/buy/bug/ that a partition number will cause the code to accidentally multiply the result by 26. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com --- src/util/util.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/util/util.c b/src/util/util.c index 75b18c1..2fd0f2c 100644 --- a/src/util/util.c +++ b/src/util/util.c @@ -2193,11 +2193,10 @@ int virDiskNameToIndex(const char *name) { return -1; for (i = 0; *ptr; i++) { -idx = (idx + (i 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26; - if (!c_islower(*ptr)) break; +idx = (idx + (i 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26; idx += *ptr - 'a'; ptr++; } ACK, Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
[libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] Fix virDiskNameToIndex to actually ignore partition numbers
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com The docs for virDiskNameToIndex claim it ignores partition numbers. In actual fact though, a code ordering buy means that a partition number will cause the code to accidentally multiply the result by 26. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com --- src/util/util.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/util/util.c b/src/util/util.c index 75b18c1..2fd0f2c 100644 --- a/src/util/util.c +++ b/src/util/util.c @@ -2193,11 +2193,10 @@ int virDiskNameToIndex(const char *name) { return -1; for (i = 0; *ptr; i++) { -idx = (idx + (i 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26; - if (!c_islower(*ptr)) break; +idx = (idx + (i 1 ? 0 : 1)) * 26; idx += *ptr - 'a'; ptr++; } -- 1.7.11.2 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list