Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Replacing for (; ; ) with while (1) for better code.

2016-09-23 Thread Nitesh Konkar 
Sure. I just read it in hacking.html and thought of sending this patch.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Martin Kletzander 
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 01:17:40AM +0530, Nitesh Konkar wrote:
>
>> As mentioned in https://libvirt.org/hacking.html,
>> using while (1) is better than for (;;).
>>
>
> I feel like there was a reason for not forbidding it (and also adding an
> exception for it in build-aux/check-spacing.pl, but I can't remember
> that.  Maybe someone else will chime in or try finding the resons for
> that in archives/git logs...
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Replacing for (; ; ) with while (1) for better code.

2016-09-23 Thread Martin Kletzander 

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 01:17:40AM +0530, Nitesh Konkar wrote:

As mentioned in https://libvirt.org/hacking.html,
using while (1) is better than for (;;).


I feel like there was a reason for not forbidding it (and also adding an
exception for it in build-aux/check-spacing.pl, but I can't remember
that.  Maybe someone else will chime in or try finding the resons for
that in archives/git logs...


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list