Re: Right to distribute modifications?

2002-02-03 Thread Bjorn Reese

John Cowan wrote:

 AFAIK the free software community has always understood the right
 to distribute modifications to be implied by this license, but
 of course (as usual) no court has spoken, and so nobody can say
 for sure.  RMS is being cautious, that's all.

Then what differentiates the right to distribute the software with
modifications from, say, the right to use the software with
modifications (which relates to the FSF's freedom 0), to warrant
explicit caution?
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



Re: Right to distribute modifications?

2002-02-03 Thread John Cowan

Bjorn Reese scripsit:

 Then what differentiates the right to distribute the software with
 modifications from, say, the right to use the software with
 modifications (which relates to the FSF's freedom 0), to warrant
 explicit caution?

Contracts are about trapping an agreement in a net of inherently
ambiguous words.  The more explicitness, the better.  That's
why (common-law) lawyers tend to use multiple synonyms, like
give and bequeath, right, title, and interest, etc.
in the hopes that what one word doesn't capture, another will.

-- 
John Cowan   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
--_The Hobbit_
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



Re: Right to distribute modifications?

2002-02-02 Thread John Cowan

Bjorn Reese scripsit:

 The license grants rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
 distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies. According to my
 understanding this includes the right to distribute modifications,
 as you've got the right to both modify and distribute.

AFAIK the free software community has always understood the right
to distribute modifications to be implied by this license, but
of course (as usual) no court has spoken, and so nobody can say
for sure.  RMS is being cautious, that's all.

-- 
John Cowan   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
--_The Hobbit_
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3