Re: [Lift] Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: This is really funny this should crop up - I've been having a conversation at Devoxx about cluster / distributing Lift. David, one of the things i've been thinking is that it would be cool if we could potentially have some kind of abstraction for SessionMaster (a bit like we have http container providers) so that we could have a session master than for instance distributed with TC or Akka etc. The only thing that is a little bit of a question mark is how one would serialise the state. By question mark, do you mean a Godzilla sized, fire breathing, acid spitting beast of a question mark... 'cause that's the size of the problem... :-( Cheers, Tim On 19 Nov 2009, at 20:41, David Pollak wrote: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:06 PM, jon jonhoff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Has anyone had any recent success with using Terracotta to share session state? I've tried playing around with a simple lift app (1.1-M7) and terracotta's sessions-configurator app. It doesn't just work, but I realized that's because Lift is hijacking sessions from the container and managing them in SessionMaster. I've tried configuring the root object to be net.liftweb.http.SessionMaster$.MODULE$ which is the entire singleton, but that includes a lot of LiftActor stuff (and terracotta complains about unlocked accesses to shared fields), and I think really only want the sessions field. I don't think i can make sessions the root because its reference is overwritten every time a new session is added. Any ideas? Jon, Can you send around the complaints TC has about sessions... I'll see where Lift is doing the offending thing and see if I can fix it. I'll ping Jonas on this... he's the resident TC expert. Thanks, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
Re: [Lift] Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:06 PM, jon jonhoff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Has anyone had any recent success with using Terracotta to share session state? I've tried playing around with a simple lift app (1.1-M7) and terracotta's sessions-configurator app. It doesn't just work, but I realized that's because Lift is hijacking sessions from the container and managing them in SessionMaster. I've tried configuring the root object to be net.liftweb.http.SessionMaster$.MODULE$ which is the entire singleton, but that includes a lot of LiftActor stuff (and terracotta complains about unlocked accesses to shared fields), and I think really only want the sessions field. I don't think i can make sessions the root because its reference is overwritten every time a new session is added. Any ideas? Jon, Can you send around the complaints TC has about sessions... I'll see where Lift is doing the offending thing and see if I can fix it. I'll ping Jonas on this... he's the resident TC expert. Thanks, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
Re: [Lift] Lift 1.1-M7 and Terracotta
Hi Jon. Could you send me what you have so far and I'll try to take a look at it. I'm pretty choked right now so I can't give it too many cycles but I'll try to do my best :-) Mail it to me directly: my first name AT jonasboner.com /Jonas 2009/11/6 jon jonhoff...@gmail.com: Hi, Has anyone had any recent success with using Terracotta to share session state? I've tried playing around with a simple lift app (1.1-M7) and terracotta's sessions-configurator app. It doesn't just work, but I realized that's because Lift is hijacking sessions from the container and managing them in SessionMaster. I've tried configuring the root object to be net.liftweb.http.SessionMaster$.MODULE$ which is the entire singleton, but that includes a lot of LiftActor stuff (and terracotta complains about unlocked accesses to shared fields), and I think really only want the sessions field. I don't think i can make sessions the root because its reference is overwritten every time a new session is added. Any ideas? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- Jonas Bonér twitter: @jboner blog:http://jonasboner.com work: http://scalablesolutions.se code: http://github.com/jboner code: http://akkasource.org also:http://letitcrash.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
