[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Actually, I thought that Dumbster was more sophisticated than it is. I think
that your approach is fine for verifying that the message is created
properly.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
What's the advantage/purpose over they method I chose?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Have you ever used Dumbster?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would like to see an integrated dumbster test. You can pick an
arbitrary port to run the test on just by attempting to bind and iterating
until you succeed. Something (roughly) like this:
def openSmtpServer (startPort : Int, endPort : Int) :
(Int,SimpleSmtpServer) = {
var port = startPort
var server : SimpleSmtpServer = null
while (port = endPort (server eq null)) {
try {
server = SimpleSmtpServer.start(port)
} catch {
case _ = port += 1
}
}
return (port,server)
}
Then you can configure Lift's mailer to send to that port on localhost
and go from there.
Derek
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can someone confirm or give other feedback? Are my tests good?
http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/83/
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Okay. Unit test are now on Review Board too (and they pass).
I'm hoping someone will be able to confirm my work so that my client, a
medical assistance volunteer-based charity organization, will have email
working properly along with the rest of Lift's great features, so that the
volunteer dispatchers will be able to click the links and help sick
people.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought of a smarter way to test it. Please tell me if you have any
objections.
I noticed that some of the specs extend the class they test. The idea
is to refactor the call to actually send the email into an outside
method.
Then, after making some private members of Mailer protected, the spec can
override the behavior of the method that sends it, to instead check the
message object.
This has the advantages of not adding another dependency to Lift, or
relying on a given port being available to run an SMTP server on whoever
builds Lift's computer.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain;
charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an
XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative.
Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift?
Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise
engage
on this subject.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that
simple
messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are
multipart?
Both.
Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all
other mail
is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the
system.
It's 2 or 3 tests.
Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses
Lift
uses
the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these
sites with
the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a
problem,
please
call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something
goes
wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this
apparently
simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the
tests.
Or something else?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test
email, or
what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on
computers
that don't have an SMTP server, I presume?
I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the
one that
made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know
no more
about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to
do the
work.
As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though
and it
works
fine. Do most commits include a unit test?
If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots
of
people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long
time
(except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for
accepting
this
change is to have a test associated with it.
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
I would like to see an integrated dumbster test. You can pick an arbitrary
port to run the test on just by attempting to bind and iterating until you
succeed. Something (roughly) like this:
def openSmtpServer (startPort : Int, endPort : Int) : (Int,SimpleSmtpServer)
= {
var port = startPort
var server : SimpleSmtpServer = null
while (port = endPort (server eq null)) {
try {
server = SimpleSmtpServer.start(port)
} catch {
case _ = port += 1
}
}
return (port,server)
}
Then you can configure Lift's mailer to send to that port on localhost and
go from there.
Derek
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Can someone confirm or give other feedback? Are my tests good?
http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/83/
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Okay. Unit test are now on Review Board too (and they pass).
I'm hoping someone will be able to confirm my work so that my client, a
medical assistance volunteer-based charity organization, will have email
working properly along with the rest of Lift's great features, so that the
volunteer dispatchers will be able to click the links and help sick people.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I thought of a smarter way to test it. Please tell me if you have any
objections.
I noticed that some of the specs extend the class they test. The idea is
to refactor the call to actually send the email into an outside method.
Then, after making some private members of Mailer protected, the spec can
override the behavior of the method that sends it, to instead check the
message object.
This has the advantages of not adding another dependency to Lift, or
relying on a given port being available to run an SMTP server on whoever
builds Lift's computer.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain;
charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an
XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative.
Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift?
Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise
engage
on this subject.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple
messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are
multipart?
Both.
Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other
mail
is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the
system.
It's 2 or 3 tests.
Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift
uses
the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites
with
the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem,
please
call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes
wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently
simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests.
Or something else?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test
email, or
what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on
computers
that don't have an SMTP server, I presume?
I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one
that
made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no
more
about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do
the
work.
As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and
it
works
fine. Do most commits include a unit test?
If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of
people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long
time
(except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting
this
change is to have a test associated with it.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay?
Did you write a test?
Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into
master
until Thursday.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
How does this look?
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Have you ever used Dumbster?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see an integrated dumbster test. You can pick an arbitrary
port to run the test on just by attempting to bind and iterating until you
succeed. Something (roughly) like this:
def openSmtpServer (startPort : Int, endPort : Int) :
(Int,SimpleSmtpServer) = {
var port = startPort
var server : SimpleSmtpServer = null
while (port = endPort (server eq null)) {
try {
server = SimpleSmtpServer.start(port)
} catch {
case _ = port += 1
}
}
return (port,server)
}
Then you can configure Lift's mailer to send to that port on localhost and
go from there.
Derek
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Can someone confirm or give other feedback? Are my tests good?
http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/83/
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Okay. Unit test are now on Review Board too (and they pass).
I'm hoping someone will be able to confirm my work so that my client, a
medical assistance volunteer-based charity organization, will have email
working properly along with the rest of Lift's great features, so that the
volunteer dispatchers will be able to click the links and help sick people.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I thought of a smarter way to test it. Please tell me if you have any
objections.
I noticed that some of the specs extend the class they test. The idea is
to refactor the call to actually send the email into an outside method.
Then, after making some private members of Mailer protected, the spec can
override the behavior of the method that sends it, to instead check the
message object.
This has the advantages of not adding another dependency to Lift, or
relying on a given port being available to run an SMTP server on whoever
builds Lift's computer.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain;
charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an
XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative.
Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift?
Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise
engage
on this subject.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple
messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are
multipart?
Both.
Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other
mail
is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the
system.
It's 2 or 3 tests.
Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses
Lift
uses
the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites
with
the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem,
please
call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something
goes
wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this
apparently
simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the
tests.
Or something else?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test
email, or
what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on
computers
that don't have an SMTP server, I presume?
I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one
that
made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no
more
about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do
the
work.
As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and
it
works
fine. Do most commits include a unit test?
If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of
people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long
time
(except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for
accepting
this
change is to have a test associated with it.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay?
Did you write a test?
Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged
into
master
until
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
What's the advantage/purpose over they method I chose?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Have you ever used Dumbster?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Derek Chen-Becker
dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see an integrated dumbster test. You can pick an arbitrary
port to run the test on just by attempting to bind and iterating until you
succeed. Something (roughly) like this:
def openSmtpServer (startPort : Int, endPort : Int) :
(Int,SimpleSmtpServer) = {
var port = startPort
var server : SimpleSmtpServer = null
while (port = endPort (server eq null)) {
try {
server = SimpleSmtpServer.start(port)
} catch {
case _ = port += 1
}
}
return (port,server)
}
Then you can configure Lift's mailer to send to that port on localhost and
go from there.
Derek
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Can someone confirm or give other feedback? Are my tests good?
http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/83/
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Okay. Unit test are now on Review Board too (and they pass).
I'm hoping someone will be able to confirm my work so that my client, a
medical assistance volunteer-based charity organization, will have email
working properly along with the rest of Lift's great features, so that the
volunteer dispatchers will be able to click the links and help sick people.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I thought of a smarter way to test it. Please tell me if you have any
objections.
I noticed that some of the specs extend the class they test. The idea
is to refactor the call to actually send the email into an outside method.
Then, after making some private members of Mailer protected, the spec can
override the behavior of the method that sends it, to instead check the
message object.
This has the advantages of not adding another dependency to Lift, or
relying on a given port being available to run an SMTP server on whoever
builds Lift's computer.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain;
charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an
XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative.
Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift?
Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise
engage
on this subject.
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that
simple
messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are
multipart?
Both.
Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other
mail
is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the
system.
It's 2 or 3 tests.
Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses
Lift
uses
the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites
with
the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem,
please
call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something
goes
wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this
apparently
simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the
tests.
Or something else?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test
email, or
what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on
computers
that don't have an SMTP server, I presume?
I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one
that
made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no
more
about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do
the
work.
As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and
it
works
fine. Do most commits include a unit test?
If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots
of
people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long
time
(except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for
accepting
this
change is to have a test associated with it.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
naftoli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Okay. Unit test are now on Review Board too (and they pass). I'm hoping someone will be able to confirm my work so that my client, a medical assistance volunteer-based charity organization, will have email working properly along with the rest of Lift's great features, so that the volunteer dispatchers will be able to click the links and help sick people. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I thought of a smarter way to test it. Please tell me if you have any objections. I noticed that some of the specs extend the class they test. The idea is to refactor the call to actually send the email into an outside method. Then, after making some private members of Mailer protected, the spec can override the behavior of the method that sends it, to instead check the message object. This has the advantages of not adding another dependency to Lift, or relying on a given port being available to run an SMTP server on whoever builds Lift's computer. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain; charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative. Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift? Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise engage on this subject. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote:
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain; charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative. Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain; charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative. Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift? Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise engage on this subject. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To:
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
So then can you answer my last question? What is a safe port to run Dumbster on? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain; charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative. Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift? Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise engage on this subject. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is?
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Let's say I write a test using dumbster. What port will it run on? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd;
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
I thought of a smarter way to test it. Please tell me if you have any objections. I noticed that some of the specs extend the class they test. The idea is to refactor the call to actually send the email into an outside method. Then, after making some private members of Mailer protected, the spec can override the behavior of the method that sends it, to instead check the message object. This has the advantages of not adding another dependency to Lift, or relying on a given port being available to run an SMTP server on whoever builds Lift's computer. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I verified locally via dumbster that the content type is test/plain; charset=us-ascii for a single PlainMailBodyType. For two, or an XHTMLMailBodyType, it's multipart/alternative. Do I still need to contribute a test to Lift? Yes. This is the last time I will state this criteria or otherwise engage on this subject. - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Wait a minute. You want me to test that my change works--that simple messages are not multipart--or that other messages still are multipart? Both. Test that mail sent as plain text is not multipart and that all other mail is multipart and that all the mail actually makes it through the system. It's 2 or 3 tests. Why am I imposing this burden on you? Almost every site that uses Lift uses the Mailer. I have given my cell phone number to some of these sites with the message I stand behind Lift... if you're experiencing a problem, please call me any time day or night. So, I'm on the hook if something goes wrong. My gut says, there could be more problems with this apparently simple change than meet the eye, so I'm asking you to write the tests. Or something else? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I asked you how to write one. I have no clue how to unit test email, or what content type an email is. And the test has to not fail on computers that don't have an SMTP server, I presume? I don't know how to write tests against mailers, but you're the one that made a change, so you have to figure out how to test it. I know no more about testing mailers than you do, so it's one of us that has to do the work. As I mentioned on review board, I did test it manually though and it works fine. Do most commits include a unit test? If this change breaks the mailer, the break impacts lots and lots of people. The mailer code has been stable and untouched for a long time (except for the change to LiftActors). So, my criteria for accepting this change is to have a test associated with it. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone look at Review Board? Is my addition okay? Did you write a test? Also, it's not going into M7, so it's not going to get merged into master until Thursday. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
How does this look? (Note: output from git diff -b, so applying it won't indent properly) On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote: Probably not until next week, unfortunately. If you don't mind looking at it, the main thing to change is in Mailer.scala, around line 156. There should be a check or match to see if info is a List(PlainMailBodyType), and if so, skip the Multipart mapping that follows and do a message.setText on the contents of the PlainMailBodyType instead. Derek On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
I guess you didn't get around to it yet. Any idea when? Thanks. http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues/#issue/110 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote: Looking at the code I don't think that it would be hard to do the right thing depending on whether someone calls sendMail with a sequence of MailBodyTypes or just a single PlainMailBodyType. If someone wants to open an issue on it I could make the change. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
In the deep dark recesses of my memory, I think we originally did text-only messages and there was some complaint about that... sigh. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Do you have evidence that it ever will auto-highlight URLs in plain text emails? E.g. some email from your client? -Ross On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: It isn't not handling the message, it's just not automatically hyperlinking the URL. Any other ideas? Thanks. - Derek Chen-Beckerdchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb. 29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
If you really want, you could send me a private message with your email address and I can send you a message that I'm absolutely sure is plain text so that you could verify. Derek On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have evidence that it ever will auto-highlight URLs in plain text emails? E.g. some email from your client? -Ross On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: It isn't not handling the message, it's just not automatically hyperlinking the URL. Any other ideas? Thanks. - Derek Chen-Beckerdchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb. 29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Yes, sure. Most smartphones do, I believe. Now my client informed me as follows. When he receives this message the email view has an option to switch between HTML view and plain text view. When he switches to plain text it does hyperlink the URL. However if I send say an SMS to his email address there's no such choice; it knows it's plain text. So I'm guessing that it's a bug on RIM's part, that multipart messages default to HTML view even if they're plain text. This is on a brand new BlackBerry (5.0). So as a workaround it would be great if Lift would support non-multipart. Thanks. - Ross Mellgrendri...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have evidence that it ever will auto-highlight URLs in plain text emails? E.g. some email from your client? -Ross On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: It isn't not handling the message, it's just not automatically hyperlinking the URL. Any other ideas? Thanks. - Derek Chen-Beckerdchenbec...@gmail.com wrote: The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb. 29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
The way that Lift uses the API we don't support sending non-multipart messages. I suppose that this could be refactored to support single part MIME messages, but I really have trouble believing that a BlackBerry can't handle it. Derek On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
That looks to be plain text, although it's using multipart encoding where it probably does not need to. -Ross On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb. 29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net [174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe. 11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net[174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: URL in PlainMailBodyType to BlackBerry
True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident I'll find such specs. What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart? - David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote: Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message. You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert messages and see why this kind of message is not being converted. Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (174-143-236-122.static.slicehost.net[174.143.236.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si71430296yxe.11.2009.10.07.12.28.55; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) client-ip=174.143.236.122; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.143.236.122 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of yehu...@lrbcol.org) smtp.mail=yehu...@lrbcol.org Received: from lrbcol (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lrbcol (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB51A0055 for naftoli...@gmail.com; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: yehu...@lrbcol.org To: naftoli...@gmail.com Message-ID: 2107786874.01254943736214.javamail.r...@lrbcol Subject: Detail of Transportation #843 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit naftuli gugenheim; 617 6st ; M: 7325342893; From : ; To : 39 hearth ct; Request URL: [TODO] --=_Part_0_1227069312.1254943735894-- On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird. Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text? What do the headers say it is? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL. Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it possible that it's somehow not purely plain text? How would I solve this? I don't want to send HTML messages because some recipients may not be able to view it. Thanks. -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
