Re: [Lift] Two new issues for TextileParser

2010-01-18 Thread David Pollak
Please don't open tickets unless you discuss them on this list first.

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, tommycli  wrote:

> I created two new issues for TextileParser.
>
> 290. TextileParser molests divs
>
> 291. TextileParser does not support notextile
>
> Additionally, it'd be nice if TextileParser were implemented in a way
> such that it was extensible. The main issue is that it's just a
> singleton object, which cannot be extended.
>
> Perhaps instead of:
>
> object TextileParser
>
> we could have:
>
> class TextileParserCls {
>  ... real stuff...
> }
>
> object TextileParser extends TextileParserCls
>
> People could then extend the class and instantiate their own singleton
> if they wanted to extend the parser.
>
> Thanks, and sorry if I'm becoming a bug on the Textile.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.

To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.



[Lift] Two new issues for TextileParser

2010-01-17 Thread tommycli
I created two new issues for TextileParser.

290. TextileParser molests divs

291. TextileParser does not support notextile

Additionally, it'd be nice if TextileParser were implemented in a way
such that it was extensible. The main issue is that it's just a
singleton object, which cannot be extended.

Perhaps instead of:

object TextileParser

we could have:

class TextileParserCls {
  ... real stuff...
}

object TextileParser extends TextileParserCls

People could then extend the class and instantiate their own singleton
if they wanted to extend the parser.

Thanks, and sorry if I'm becoming a bug on the Textile.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.