Re: Doc: NR add predefined paper sizes to appendix (issue 5783075)

[pkx166h]

Reviewers: dak,

Message:
My new ammended comment in the git format patch seems to not have been
included with git-cl

--snip--
Issue 2391

Copied predefined paper size entries from scm/paper.scm as a seperate
appendix entry in order to better document predefined paper sizes.

Also revamped section on Paper Sizes including better @cindex entries,
reworded explanation and examples including how to create a custom
paper size without the need to edit scm/paper.scm

Added note in scm/paper.scm to say that the appendix entry was not
autogenerated so that any new entries will not be forgotten to be added
in the appendix - until someone 'scripts' it.

--snip--

If this is too large a patch now I can split it up.

It passes make and a full make doc.

Description:
Doc: NR add predefined paper sizes to appendix

Issue 2391

Copied predefined paper size entries from scm/paper.scm as a seperate
appendix entry in order to better document predefined paper sizes

Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5783075/

Affected files:
  M Documentation/notation/notation-appendices.itely
  M Documentation/notation/spacing.itely
  M scm/paper.scm



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

[Janek Warchoł]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:03 PM,   wrote:
> I'm working with the University of Paris VIII to get a computer consecrated 
> to the cause.  Once that happens, we'll have a new patchy platform.  It's 
> also good to have that sorta institutional alliance when it comes to applying 
> to stuff like GSoC.

Cool!  Great idea, thanks!
Janek

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

[mike]

I'm working with the University of Paris VIII to get a computer consecrated to 
the cause.  Once that happens, we'll have a new patchy platform.  It's also 
good to have that sorta institutional alliance when it comes to applying to 
stuff like GSoC.

Cheers,
MS

On Mar 16, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Graham Percival wrote:

> I think it's high time for somebody else to run the new-patches
> test.  For this task, David is ridiculously overqualified, but his
> laptop is pretty underqualified.  That combination makes him
> almost the worst person to run this task.
> 
> I'm hoping that this won't end up with James doing it; IMO even
> James is overqualified to be running patchy new-patches.  But
> maybe that would be ok for a week or two, in order to catch some
> more "gotchas" in the script and docs, then pass it on to another
> person.  Maybe one of the bug squad members?
> 
> NB: this is *not* a review, nor does it require any knowledge of
> lilypond programming at all.  You run a script, if it finishes
> then you look at some pictures and then say "nope, no change to
> the pictures".  Once you have the script set up -- which is easier
> than the patchy staging-merge, BTW -- it's easier than being a bug
> squad member!
> 
> On a more general note, I've love it if we could start foisting
> off some more development/maintenace tasks onto the current bug
> squad members, and start recruiting some new bug squad members to
> replace the existing ones.
> 
> - Graham
> 
> ___
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Postscript printer errors with rounded barlines?

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 07:38:29PM +, Keith OHara wrote:
> David Kastrup  gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > "Prior Emails"? 
> 
> Here :
> 
> The resulting patch solved the problem of thick barlines, but did not 
> make it into version 2.14.

True.  I've lost track of whether this is discussing current devel
or 2.14, but to save anybody else searching, it looks like that
discussion produced this commit:
  5291daf785cd215145473781612732de94890ba0
added between 2.15.4 and 2.15.6.

- Graham

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Postscript printer errors with rounded barlines?

[Keith OHara]

David Kastrup  gnu.org> writes:

> Todd Lewis  email.unc.edu> writes:
> 
> > The work-around [...] indicated in prior emails to avoid
> > rectstroke with a 0.0 linewidth, 
> 
> "Prior Emails"? 

Here :

The resulting patch solved the problem of thick barlines, but did not 
make it into version 2.14.

> Anyway, starting with version 2.15.31, the patch 
> [...]
> is in the repository.  No "previous mail" was consulted, the issue is a
> different one.  

Different, but similar, and affecting the same piece of code.



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

[James]

Hello,

On 16 March 2012 21:30, Graham Percival  wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:28:21PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote:
>> On 16/03/2012 4:55 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>> >... although apparently that doesn't include a link to the actual
>> >code.  huh.
>> >https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra
>>
>> No?
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy#Installing-patchy
>
> oh, huh.  My eyes skipped over it because it wasn't blue.
>
> Anybody feel like wrapping that in a @uref{} ?  If so, please push
> directly to staging.
>

Voila!

committer   James Lowe   
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:19:17 + (16:19 +)
commit  ddc638764124c27750baf39b4c42f7f6d0061a15



-- 
--

James

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Hiding old website /web/install page (issue 5500069)

[julien . rioux]

this rietveld issue can be closed.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5500069/

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Copy pdf docs to new website folder (issue 5507046)

[julien . rioux]

On 2012/01/03 20:36:48, Graham Percival wrote:

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:31:54PM +, mailto:hashas...@gmail.com

wrote:

> Sorry, didn't understand what you mean by "add issue 2166 to track

this"


It's not relevant unless you're going to be making other patches.
If you are, read the "summary for experienced developers" again in
more detail.  The git-cl step wasn't done properly.



> Anything I can do to help this to get live?



Wait a day or two.  It's on the countdown right now.  See the
summary for experienced developers if you don't know what that
means.



Cheers,
- Graham


This rietveld issue can be closed.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5507046/

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

[Janek Warchoł]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Julien Rioux
 wrote:
> On 16/03/2012 5:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
>>
>> There are a few organisations interesting for lilypond hackers:
>> inkscape (to learn about svg), closure (to learn a scheme-like
>> language), buildbot (could be helpful but we already have the gran
>> unified builder).
>
> libreoffice (improve the lilypond plugin), wikimedia (lilypond plugin again)

thanks a lot for these suggestions, Julien!  We're going to be added
to GNU umbrella, but i'm considering applying to one of the projects
you mentioned, too.

Janek

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: GNU accepted for GSOC (was: application has been rejected)

[Janek Warchoł]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Graham Percival
 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:16:10PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> I'll contact them asking to add us to their umbrella.  Any suggestions
>> before i do this?
>
> Prepare a blurb in the same format as their existing ones.
>
>>  Shall i talk with them about the number of
>> students' slots (i guess we could ask for 2 slots)?
>
> No, I think that would be a bit rude.  IIRC last year they had 6
> students; we cannot claim that lilypond is as important as 33% of
> GNU.  Given the importance of some of those other projects
> (autotools, linux-libre-firmware), I think we would be lucky to
> get one.  (granted, I think lilypond is more important than some
> of the other projects on that list, but it's just possible that
> I'm biased in some way)
> Just send an email asking to be added to the list and hope for the
> best.

Done.

cheers,
Janek

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Postscript printer errors with rounded barlines?

[David Kastrup]

Todd Lewis  writes:

> The work-around is to change /draw_round_box in
> ps/music-drawing-routines.ps as indicated in prior emails to avoid
> rectstroke with a 0.0 linewidth, the behavior of which is device
> dependent.

"Prior Emails"?  Anyway, starting with version 2.15.31, the patch

commit 4666869ad53760ead32eba6c5dc75e43c69f4c87
Author: David Kastrup 
Date:   Mon Feb 27 23:29:24 2012 +0100

Issue 2328: Ledger lines in PNG output have white interior

Don't stroke rectangles with height or width 0 in draw_round_box

diff --git a/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps b/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps
index d7450e45..3e62f03 100644
--- a/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps
+++ b/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps
@@ -98,15 +98,20 @@ bind def
 dup
0.0 gt {
setlinewidth % w h x y
-   0 setlinecap
-   1 setlinejoin
-
rmoveto % w h
-   currentpoint % w h x1 y1
-   4 2 roll % x1 y1 w h
-   4 copy
-   rectfill
-   rectstroke
+   2 copy 0 ne exch 0 ne and
+   {
+   0 setlinecap
+   1 setlinejoin
+   currentpoint % w h x1 y1
+   4 2 roll % x1 y1 w h
+   4 copy
+   rectfill
+   rectstroke
+   } {
+   1 setlinecap
+   rlineto stroke
+   } ifelse
} {
pop % w h x y
rmoveto % w h

is in the repository.  No "previous mail" was consulted, the issue is a
different one.  So it would very much appear like a failure in
communication.  When and in what context did you write your "previous
mail"?

-- 
David Kastrup


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

[David Kastrup]

Carl Sorensen  writes:

> On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, "no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com"
>  wrote:
>
>>Thank you for submitting "LilyPond" organization application to Google
>>Summer of Code 2012.
>>Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your organization's application
>>at this time.
>>We received many more applications for the program than we are able to
>>accommodate,
>>and we would encourage you to reapply for future instances of the program.
>>Best regards,
>>  Google Open Source Programs
>
> As you can see, we did not qualify for GSOC this year.

Perhaps the following mail from an internal list for GNU maintainers
helps.

From: jema...@gnu.org (Jose E. Marchesi)
Subject: [gnu-prog-discuss] GNU got accepted in SoC 2012
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:08:42 +0100 (11 hours, 7 minutes, 44 seconds ago)


Hi hackers.

The GNU Project was accepted as an organization in the Google Summer of
Code 2012.  We just filled the organization form so we would appear in
the melange site.

Several GNU programs applied separately as organizations.  In case some
of them were not accepted they are welcome to add their projects/idea
under the umbrella of the GNU Project.  Just send an email with the
information (or a link to your ideas page) to summer-of-c...@gnu.org and
we will update the general ideas page.

-- 
Jose E. Marchesi http://www.jemarch.net
GNU Project  http://www.gnu.org


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel