Re: musicxml2ly
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have tried have the Chords printed below instead of above the staff. I remember this had been fixed in one of the previous lilypond 2.15.x versions, but with musicxml2ly from Lilypond 2.15.37 I am still (again?) having this problem. Same with 2.15.38 Hi, I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below the staff again. Regression? -- MT ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: musicxml2ly
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below the staff again. Regression? Report bugs to the bugs mailing list, not the user or devel lists. - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: musicxml2ly
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have tried have the Chords printed below instead of above the staff. I remember this had been fixed in one of the previous lilypond 2.15.x versions, but with musicxml2ly from Lilypond 2.15.37 I am still (again?) having this problem. Same with 2.15.38 I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below the staff again. Regression? That must be very frustrating for you. Sorry that I can't help you, as I'm not familiar with musicxml2ly. It appears to be central to Patrick's project so I would imagine he or his colleagues are working hard on this. http://www.philomelos.net/en/about There are a number of issue trackers relating to musicxml2ly but I see no issue tracker for this bug, Martin. I'd like to at least record the bug. We can create a tracker if you supply these details: 1. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly and a specific lead sheet from Wikifonia in MusicXML format that together exhibit the bug. 2. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly from the 2.15.x series which does not exhibit the bug. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: musicxml2ly
It's not a regression. It has never been officially fixed. A while ago I posted a bug report and a minimal example: http://old.nabble.com/musicxml2ly%3A-chordnames-placement-bug-td33309393.html. Here is a solution for the chord symbol bug: http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/. I still haven't found the time to tidy up the patch. But it works! Am 16.05.2012 um 10:18 schrieb Colin Hall: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: The good news is that in many cases only a little editing of the .ly file is required to turn a bad conversion into a good one. For example, all lead sheets from Wikifonia that I have tried have the Chords printed below instead of above the staff. I remember this had been fixed in one of the previous lilypond 2.15.x versions, but with musicxml2ly from Lilypond 2.15.37 I am still (again?) having this problem. Same with 2.15.38 I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below the staff again. Regression? That must be very frustrating for you. Sorry that I can't help you, as I'm not familiar with musicxml2ly. It appears to be central to Patrick's project so I would imagine he or his colleagues are working hard on this. http://www.philomelos.net/en/about There are a number of issue trackers relating to musicxml2ly but I see no issue tracker for this bug, Martin. I'd like to at least record the bug. We can create a tracker if you supply these details: 1. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly and a specific lead sheet from Wikifonia in MusicXML format that together exhibit the bug. 2. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly from the 2.15.x series which does not exhibit the bug. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilyp...@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
GUB make bootstrap failed at download of linux headers 2.4.34
Hi,
Using LilyDev on a VirtualBox VM I attempted GUB make bootstrap and found this:
---
colin@colin-laptop ~$ ( rm -rf gub git clone
git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git cd gub make bootstrap )
(output elided)
colin@colin-laptop ~$ echo; tail -25 gub/log/gub.log | head -8; echo;
LOOKING FOR: Bzip2__tools
cls:class 'bzip2.Bzip2__tools'
dependencies[linux-x86]: system::gcc tools::librestrict tools::make
tools::libtool tools::file tools::tar tools::m4 tools::perl tools::autoconf
tools::patch tools::zlib tools::bzip2 linux-x86::linux-headers
linux-x86::cross/binutils linux-x86::cross/gcc-core tools::bison
linux-x86::glibc-core linux-x86::cross/gcc tools::gzip linux-x86::glibc
*** Stage: download (linux-headers, linux-x86)
Running download_url
('http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2',
'/home/colin/gub/downloads/linux-headers')
{}
Traceback (most recent call last):
colin@colin-laptop ~$ echo Looks like GUB can't find the linux headers
/dev/null
colin@colin-laptop ~$
colin@colin-laptop ~$ wget
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2
--2012-05-16 12:19:31--
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2
Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 146.137.96.7, 2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9
Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|146.137.96.7|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2012-05-16 12:19:32 ERROR 404: Not Found.
colin@colin-laptop ~$ echo wget can't find them either /dev/null
--
The mirror.anl.gov mirror of the Linux kernel 2.4.34 appears to be incomplete
c.f. http://www.kernel.org/
Is this a surprise?
Can someone recommend a resolution?
Cheers,
Colin.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GUB make bootstrap failed at download of linux headers 2.4.34
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30:36PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Running download_url
('http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2',
'/home/colin/gub/downloads/linux-headers')
{}
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
Is this a surprise?
I'm slightly surprised, although no problem with GUB _really_
surprises me. Mirrors occasionally die out, but I wouldn't have
expected that one to go.
Can someone recommend a resolution?
Try finding a different mirror (use the normal kernel.net mirror
service web pages to find one), then edit
gub/specs/lilypond-headers-*.py
(possibly the wrong name)
to point to the new location, then try make bootstrap again.
If it works, then we could apply that patch to the main repo.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Adds Flag to Fingering side support list (issue 6201079)
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/6201079/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: CG tweak: some extra info on make doc and doc build times. (issue 6206071)
http://codereview.appspot.com/6206071/diff/1/Documentation/included/compile.itexi File Documentation/included/compile.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6206071/diff/1/Documentation/included/compile.itexi#newcode464 Documentation/included/compile.itexi:464: or to build only the PDF documentation, Don't we have a different place that discusses the doc-related build stuff? I could have sworn that we had a dedicated section to this. If so, perhaps this part should simply be a link to the doc-building stuff, and put the doc-stage-1 in there? http://codereview.appspot.com/6206071/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Issue 2497: documentation of restrainOpenStrings (issue 6206072)
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/6206072/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: CG tweak: some extra info on make doc and doc build times. (issue 6206071)
On 2012/05/16 12:05:19, Graham Percival wrote: Don't we have a different place that discusses the doc-related build stuff? You're right; it's in Section 4.6.2. It's not necessarily obvious/easy to find as Section 4.6 is simply titled 'post-compilation options'. I'll tweak as you suggest, with links. https://codereview.appspot.com/6206071/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GUB make bootstrap failed at download of linux headers 2.4.34
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:37:12PM +0200, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30:36PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Running download_url
('http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2',
'/home/colin/gub/downloads/linux-headers')
{}
Can someone recommend a resolution?
Try finding a different mirror (use the normal kernel.net mirror
service web pages to find one), then edit
gub/specs/lilypond-headers-*.py
(possibly the wrong name)
to point to the new location, then try make bootstrap again.
That worked perfectly. Thanks very much. It turns out that anl.gov is
faithfully mirroring kernel.org
wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2
returns 404 and
wget ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2
also fails with file not found. Meanwhile my GUB make bootstrap is continuing.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: musicxml2ly
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:42:09AM +0200, pls wrote: It's not a regression. It has never been officially fixed. A while ago I posted a bug report and a minimal example: http://old.nabble.com/musicxml2ly%3A-chordnames-placement-bug-td33309393.html. Here is a solution for the chord symbol bug: http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/. I still haven't found the time to tidy up the patch. But it works! Thanks, Patrick. I'm going to move this conversation to bug-lilypond cc Martin and respond in full there. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Successful GUB make bootstrap and bin/gub lilypond-installer
Just to report that GUB is working on a VM here: $ git clone git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git cd gub $ make bootstrap $ bin/gub lilypond-installer $ sh uploads/lilypond-2.15.39-0.linux-x86.sh $ which lilypond /home/colin/bin/lilypond $ lilypond -v | grep ^GNU GNU LilyPond 2.15.39 The only problem was that broken URI for the 2.4.34 linux kernel distribution. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Successful GUB make bootstrap and bin/gub lilypond-installer
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com wrote: Just to report that GUB is working on a VM here: congratulations (if i understand correctly)! Janek ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
CG tweak: some extra info on make doc and doc build times. (issue 6206071)
Reviewers: ,
Message:
As per earlier discussion on devel list, this patch just adds a little
bit of extra info on the make process, noting the documentation build
commands and the possible length of build times.
Basically it's to stop other people getting worried as I did when a
single step of the doc build process seemed to have hung with no
progress.
Description:
CG tweak: some extra info on make doc and doc build times.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/6206071/
Affected files:
M Documentation/included/compile.itexi
Index: Documentation/included/compile.itexi
diff --git a/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
b/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
index
e95cf2629cd8122a1f7c0c909f3f8d731d5bef0e..4b87ce1fc7602edccb32592a6aa232d62ce08b74
100644
--- a/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
@@ -456,6 +456,23 @@ targets, run:
make help
@end example
+For example, to build documentation, you can use
+@example
+make doc
+@end example
+
+or to build only the PDF documentation,
+
+@example
+make doc-stage-1
+@end example
+
+Documentation builds can take much longer than building LilyPond itself.
+Some individual commands issued during the make process may take as long
+as an hour to complete on older single-core machines, so don't panic if
+for a long time it looks like nothing is happening! Be patient, and the
+build will complete.
+
TODO: Describe what @command{make} actually does.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Successful GUB make bootstrap and bin/gub lilypond-installer
Colin did you use a lilydev? If so was it v.2.6? -- -- James On 16 May 2012, at 19:26, Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com wrote: Just to report that GUB is working on a VM here: $ git clone git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git cd gub $ make bootstrap $ bin/gub lilypond-installer $ sh uploads/lilypond-2.15.39-0.linux-x86.sh $ which lilypond /home/colin/bin/lilypond $ lilypond -v | grep ^GNU GNU LilyPond 2.15.39 The only problem was that broken URI for the 2.4.34 linux kernel distribution. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: testing new texinfo.tex
Werner On 15 May 2012 06:10, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote: Folks, can someone with a fast machine please test whether a recent texinfo.tex file works for the lilypond documentation? Simply replace tex/texinfo.tex (temporarily) with this file: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/*checkout*/texinfo/doc/texinfo.tex?revision=1.365root=texinfo I get an error attached error log James snippets.texi2pdf.log Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
